The INSIGHT Feasibility Study Ultrasound in the Intensive Care Unit: A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial
NCT ID: NCT05569798
Last Updated: 2023-10-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-12-04
2024-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Providing other healthcare professionals such as Advanced Critical Care Practitioners (ACCPs), ICU nurses and physiotherapists with PoCUS skills increases the proportion of trained staff to perform routine PoCUS in the ICU. This could aid earlier identification of abnormal pathology, earlier treatment, and prevent patient deterioration. The advancement of handheld PoCUS technology is making ultrasound more portable, cheaper and easier to use.
The increased accessibility of PoCUS combined with growing evidence of its diagnostic accuracy compared to other modes of imaging means PoCUS use is gaining traction globally. However, little to no research exists investigating the feasibility of implementing scheduled interprofessional PoCUS in the ICU and its impact on patient outcomes.
This study aims to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of a quick and simple whole body ultrasound scan performed by trained ACCPs, ICU nurses, physiotherapists, and doctors at set time points throughout the patients ICU stay. The investigators want to find out the most common barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation and to explore the key clinical outcomes for use in a future definitive RCT.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Impact of POCUS on Treatment Planning and Prognosis in the ICU
NCT06613464
Quantitative Ultrasound Assessment of Abdominal Cavity Space
NCT06634732
Impact of Integrated Cardiopulmonary Ultrasound on Clinical Outcome of Shocked Patients in Intensive Care Unit
NCT06295445
The CCUS Based Characteristic of Hemodynamic and Lung Pathology in Early Stage of Shock in ICU: The Epidemic and Prognostic Value
NCT03082326
Correlation Between PaO2/FiO2 and Lung Ultrasound Score in the Intensive Care Unit
NCT05631756
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In addition, increased routine PoCUS use by multiple professions will create a shared communication platform with the potential to enhance interdisciplinary collaboration. PoCUS use meets the growing demand for advanced assessment skills in the ICU, increasing autonomy and improving staff retention. PoCUS may reduce service costs by limiting the need for other imaging. In addition, the economic value of fewer diagnostic tests and the potential for improved patient outcomes could be significant. Storage solutions for diagnostic imaging present an ongoing challenge throughout the healthcare service. Imaging is stored on multiple platforms, making reviewing of images often location dependent. Identifying the most accessible storage platform for routine image review could significantly influence utilisation of images during patient assessment.
The investigator's aim is to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the INSIGHT Intervention within the ICU environment. This comprises performing a whole body PoCUS (INSIGHT) scan on days 1, 3, and 7 of ICU admission, with review by the clinical team.
The INSIGHT Scan is a whole-body PoCUS scan which comprises imaging the following windows:
1. subcostal
2. inferior vena cava cardiac view
3. left hemidiaphragm
4. bladder
5. right hemidiaphragm
6. six major central veins (left/right internal jugular/ subclavian/ femoral veins)
Design and Setting: A mixed-methods study across 2 adult ICUs (30 beds) within the critical care centre at KCH, London.
The Study will be conducted in two stages:
Stage 1 Aim: The aim of this stage is to identify and address the acceptability and feasibility of the INSIGHT intervention from the perspective of key stakeholders.
The primary objectives will be to:
1. Assess barriers and facilitators to delivering the delivering the INSIGHT intervention
2. Refine the INSIGHT intervention so that it is acceptable to key stakeholders
3. To have a clear understanding of intervention fidelity and ability to recruit participants (33, 34)
The following feasibility outcomes will be evaluated:
1. availability of a trained staff member to perform the INSIGHT scan when an eligible patient is identified
2. barriers to completing the INSIGHT scan
3. barriers to accessing INSIGHT scan images during ward round
4. barriers to incorporating the INSIGHT scan into routine clinical care
5. number of eligible patients (screening data)
6. screening and recruitment methods (number of 'missed' patients and reason for non-enrolment)
ICU Patient Sample: Convenience sampling will be used to recruit 20 adult (18 years or over) ICU patients.
ICU Staff Sample: Prior to stage 1 commencement, a minimum of 10 staff members will have completed the training and will be approached for consent to participate in this study.
Fifteen INSIGHT-trained and non INSIGHT-trained clinical staff will be recruited using purposive sampling (ACCPs, nurses, doctors, physiotherapists) to either attend one of two focus groups.
Data collection methods:
* Go-along interviews with trained staff whilst performing the INSIGHT scan
* Ward round observations
* Questionnaires will be distributed to staff before any patients receive an INSIGHT scan, the after 5, 10, 15, and 20 patients have been scanned
* Focus groups
Stage 2 Aim: To evaluate the feasibility of the INSIGHT intervention trial design to inform a future adequately powered randomised controlled trial.
Primary Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of the INSIGHT Scanning Protocol.
Feasibility objectives:
1. Recruitment rate and willingness of approached eligible patients to consent
2. Number of complete scans (i.e., 6/6 windows)
3. Reasons scans not performed/completed
4. Time taken to perform and report INSIGHT scans
5. Proportion of complete scan reports compared to the total number of scans performed
6. Staff perceived feasibility of the INSIGHT Scan on days 1, 3, and 7 of ICU admission
6\. Adherence to the INSIGHT Scanning Protocol, measured by the number of INSIGHT scans and reports completed compared to the number required in the INSIGHT protocol design 7. Rate of adverse and serious adverse events
Exploratory clinical objectives:
1. Number of diagnostic tests (chest X-ray, non-INSIGHT ultrasound, CT scans \[excluding head\]) per patient during ICU stay
2. Radiation exposure (measured in mSv)
3. Duration of mechanical ventilation
4. ICU length of stay
5. Number of nosocomial infections
6. Number and type of incidental clinical findings detected using the INSIGHT scan and time to a clinical intervention to address this incidental clinical finding
Patient participant sample: The investigators will recruit 60 patients during the study.
Randomisation: Participants will be randomised to receive the INSIGHT intervention or standard care (no INSIGHT intervention) on a 1:1 basis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard care
Thirty patients will receive standard care (regular ICU treatment without any restriction to usual medical care). INSIGHT scans will not be performed on these patients. However, other forms of ultrasound scanning will be permitted in this group. For example, departmental ultrasound scans (full echocardiography, liver, or vascular ultrasound assessment); transoesophageal echocardiography; transcranial doppler; any form of PoCUS other than the INSIGHT scan.
No interventions assigned to this group
Standard care + the INSIGHT intervention
Thirty patients will receive standard care + the INSIGHT intervention. The INSIGHT intervention is described in detail in section 5.7.1. INSIGHT scans will be performed by staff trained in the INSIGHT Training and Competency Programme on days 1 (0-36 hours), 3 (72-96 hours) and 7 (6 to 8 days) from ICU admission. Scans will only be performed at these timepoints if the patient is still admitted to the ICU.
Whole body point of care ultrasound scan
The INSIGHT Scan is a whole-body PoCUS scan which comprises imaging the following windows:
1. subcostal
2. inferior vena cava cardiac view
3. left hemidiaphragm
4. bladder
5. right hemidiaphragm
6. six major central veins (left/right internal jugular/ subclavian/ femoral veins)
The scan should take no more than 10 minutes to perform. Simple yes/no questions are asked for each window to identify any significant abnormalities. For example, is the left ventricle bigger than the right ventricle; is there a pleural effusion; is the bladder distended etc.
The scan is reported in the intensive care online medical notes and reviewed by the clinical team as soon as possible.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Whole body point of care ultrasound scan
The INSIGHT Scan is a whole-body PoCUS scan which comprises imaging the following windows:
1. subcostal
2. inferior vena cava cardiac view
3. left hemidiaphragm
4. bladder
5. right hemidiaphragm
6. six major central veins (left/right internal jugular/ subclavian/ femoral veins)
The scan should take no more than 10 minutes to perform. Simple yes/no questions are asked for each window to identify any significant abnormalities. For example, is the left ventricle bigger than the right ventricle; is there a pleural effusion; is the bladder distended etc.
The scan is reported in the intensive care online medical notes and reviewed by the clinical team as soon as possible.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Critically ill patient requiring level 2/3 care
3. Provides consent to participate (or consent given by substitute decision maker)
4. Anticipated to be admitted to ICU for at least 72 hours from time of admission
i. Nurse, ACCP, physiotherapist, or doctor ii. Completion of an advanced course in ICU nursing, ACCP course, ICU physiotherapy or medicine iii. Working in a participating ICU for a minimum of 6 months before enrolment on training course iv. Competent or undergoing training in the INSIGHT Scan
Exclusion Criteria
1. Dressings that restrict the INSIGHT window views
2. Flail chest
3. Other unstable fractures that might prevent scanning
4. Open abdominal/thorax wounds
5. Surgical emphysema
2. Uncontrolled agitation or pain: this will make scanning more challenging and affect image acquisition
3. Clinical instability requiring prioritisation of stabilising or resuscitative care
4. Allergy to ultrasound gel
5. Anticipated withdrawal of care in the next 24 hours
i. Any injuries or musculoskeletal conditions that would be exacerbated by performing ultrasound ii. On rotation or planning on leaving ICU role in 6 or less months
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
King's College London
OTHER
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eleanor Corcoran
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Doctoral Research Fellow
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
313425
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.