Intraosseous Access in the Emergency Department for Patients With Failed Attempts at Intravenous Access: A Randomized Trial Examining Resource Utilization and Patient Satisfaction

NCT ID: NCT01676350

Last Updated: 2022-03-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-08-31

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

By doing this study, the investigators hope to learn whether patients with difficult to obtain IV access who are treated with IO access are more satisfied with their care and have better outcomes. The investigators are specifically studying the time difference between groups and the difference in the number of attempts required to obtain vascular access and begin to treat with fluids and medications. The study will also measure patient satisfaction and procedural pain, the frequency of central line placement, the length of stay in the hospital and emergency department, and adverse events to intravascular access to determine whether IO access can improve these measures.

The investigators hypothesize that the use of a protocol utilizing an IO device for select patients with failed IV access will reduce the time requirements to obtain vascular access, reduce the number of attempts needed to obtain IV access, reduce the ED LOS, and have no negative impact on patient satisfaction compared to the current ED practices.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Difficult Peripheral IV Access

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard of care

If you are assigned to this group, ultrasound-guided IV will be used to obtain vascular access.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

IO access using EZ-IO®

If you are assigned to this group, you will receive an IO line in the humeral head of the shoulder. IO lines are placed using an FDA-approved device called an EZ-IO®.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

IO access using EZ-IO®

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

IO line placed using an FDA-approved device called an EZ-IO®.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

IO access using EZ-IO®

IO line placed using an FDA-approved device called an EZ-IO®.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EZ-IO®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. 18 years of age or older
2. Hemodynamically stable
3. Speaks English
4. Able to consent
5. Has difficult IV access

Exclusion Criteria

1\. Patients who are younger than 18 years of age, b) lack English fluency c) are unable to give informed consent d) require immediate central venous access e) have a history of osteomyelitis in the only target location of IO access f) have a fracture in the bone of the only target IO site g) have received an IO in the last 24 hours of the only target site h) are allergic to lidocaine i) pregnant or j) require a contrast CT scan as part of their ED care will be excluded.

While pregnant patients may benefit from rescue access the use of lidocaine to anesthetize the medullary space has not been studied in this population.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Pennsylvania

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

WellSpan Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Erik Kochert, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

York Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

York Hospital

York, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

299341

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Safe-Infusion Study
NCT06727240 RECRUITING NA
Access Cannulation Trial II
NCT05490225 RECRUITING NA