Clipped Versus Handsewn Arteriovenous Fistula Anastomosis

NCT ID: NCT01669850

Last Updated: 2015-09-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

38 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-08-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether handsewn anastomosis versus clipped technique is associated with more complications, fistula failures, surgical cost and surgical time.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

End stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis has become more prevalent in recent years. Achieving vascular access is an important step in receiving hemodialysis. Recent national goals have established that approximately 65% of all dialysis access points should be arteriovenous fistulas due to higher patency rates and decreased rates of further surgeries. Multiple studies have been done to assess optimal suture technique for arteriovenous anastomoses. The use of clips versus a handsewn technique has been evaluated in retrospective studies with some reports indicating a higher primary patency rate with a clip technique. Further study is needed to definitively determine the technique that results in the highest patency rates and lowest rate of re-operation. The purpose of this study is to determine whether hand-sewn anastomosis versus a clipped technique is associated with more complications, failures, surgical cost and surgical time by randomizing patients to either a clipped anastomosis group or a handsewn anastomosis group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arteriovenous Fistula Complications and Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Clipped anastomosis

A vascular clip device will be used to create the anastomosis during arteriovenous fistula creation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Clipped anastomosis

Intervention Type DEVICE

The vascular clip devise will be used to complete the anastomosis during fistula creation.

Handsewn anastomosis

A handsewn technique will be used to create the anastomosis in arteriovenous fistula creation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Handsewn anastomosis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

a handsewn anastomosis technique will be used during fistula creation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Clipped anastomosis

The vascular clip devise will be used to complete the anastomosis during fistula creation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Handsewn anastomosis

a handsewn anastomosis technique will be used during fistula creation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Anastoclip (Le Maitre)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years of age or older.
* Need for AVF creation for vascular access for planned hemodialysis (within 1 year).
* The planned AVF site must be naïve of prior AVF creations.
* Vein mapping studies completed
* 2.5 - 3mm minimum vein diameter on mapping

Exclusion Criteria

* Less than 18 years of age.
* Inability to provide consent.
* Previous failed AVFs in both arms.
* Contraindications to AVF creation:

* ipsilateral proximal venous and arterial occlusion or stenosis
* systemic or local infection
* too ill to operate
* Anticipated inability to keep 30-day postoperative follow-up appointment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gundersen Lutheran Health System

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kara Kallies

Advanced Research Associate, on behalf of Clark Davis, MD (PI)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clark A Davis, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Gundersen Lutheran Health System

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gundersen Lutheran Health System

La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Baguneid MS, Goldner S, Fulford PE, Hamilton G, Walker MG, Seifalian AM. A comparison of para-anastomotic compliance profiles after vascular anastomosis: nonpenetrating clips versus standard sutures. J Vasc Surg. 2001 Apr;33(4):812-20. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.112806.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11296337 (View on PubMed)

Lin PH, Bush RL, Nelson JC, Lam R, Paladugu R, Chen C, Quinn G, Lumsden AB. A prospective evaluation of interrupted nitinol surgical clips in arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis. Am J Surg. 2003 Dec;186(6):625-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.08.007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14672769 (View on PubMed)

Varcoe RL, Teo AB, Pelletier MH, Yu Y, Yang JL, Crowe PJ, Walsh WR. An arteriovenous fistula model of intimal hyperplasia for evaluation of a nitinol U-Clip anastomosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;43(2):224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22104322 (View on PubMed)

Shenoy S, Miller A, Petersen F, Kirsch WM, Konkin T, Kim P, Dickson C, Schild AF, Stewart L, Reyes M, Anton L, Woodward RS. A multicenter study of permanent hemodialysis access patency: beneficial effect of clipped vascular anastomotic technique. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Aug;38(2):229-35. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00412-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12891102 (View on PubMed)

Shenoy S, Woodward RS. Economic impact of the beneficial effect of changing vascular anastomotic technique in hemodialysis access. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct;39(5):437-43. doi: 10.1177/153857440503900509.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16193217 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2-12-07-002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.