Fluoroscopic Analysis of PFC CR 150 Versus Standard PFC CR Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants in Deep Flexion
NCT ID: NCT01659229
Last Updated: 2012-08-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
12 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-10-31
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Determine the Performance of the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma RP-F Knee System
NCT00761410
Does Implant Design Improve Postoperative Flexion?
NCT00380861
A Study to Compare the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Rotating-platform High-flexion (RP-F) Versus the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Rotating-platform (RP) Knee Implants
NCT00733369
Sigma CR150 Versus Sigma CR Knee RCT
NCT01418378
Randomized Fixed Bearing vs Mobile Bearing Cruciate Retaining TKA
NCT00289094
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PFC CR 150 total knee implant
Study group implant: PFC CR 150 Control group implant: PFC CR standard
No interventions assigned to this group
PFC CR Standard
study group implant: PFC CR 150 control group implant: PFC CR Standard
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Surgery more than 2 years
* Able to walk, climb stairs
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who required revision surgery
* Patients who received an all polyethylene tibial insert
* Patients who received rotating platform tibial tray
50 Years
95 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
DePuy International
INDUSTRY
Singapore General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dr Seng Jin Yeo, MBBS FRCS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Singapore General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nicholls RL, Schirm AC, Jeffcote BO, Kuster MS. Tibiofemoral force following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of four prosthesis designs in vitro. J Orthop Res. 2007 Nov;25(11):1506-12. doi: 10.1002/jor.20438.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
63214040
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.