P.F.C. Sigma Fixed Versus P.F.C. RP Mobile Bearing Total Knee Systems

NCT ID: NCT00208286

Last Updated: 2016-06-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-11-30

Study Completion Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This post-market clinical follow-up study was designed to compile long-term knee replacement outcomes of the PFC Sigma fixed and PFC Sigma mobile Rotating Platform (RP) knee systems. The first patient had surgery on November 8, 2001 and the final patient had surgery on July 29, 2005. There were 120 knees consented by a single site, which was the planned sample size in the study protocol, with 117 receiving one of the study devices. The study was terminated as the primary outcome was met and the investigator decided to conduct the study without sponsor support after 2009.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Performance and safety will be assessed using the following surgeon and patient based outcome tools:

1. American Knee Society Knee and Function Scores
2. Knee Society Radiological Analysis
3. Oxford Knee Score
4. SF 12 Score
5. Anterior Knee Pain Score

Specific objectives of the evaluation being to assess the following:

1. Improvement in functional recovery
2. Incidence of anterior knee pain
3. Improvement in Quality of life
4. Incidence of tibial loosening
5. Incidence of excessive polyethylene wear

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PFC Sigma Fixed Bearing

PFC Sigma Fixed Bearing system for use in total knee arthroplasty

Group Type OTHER

PFC Sigma Fixed Bearing

Intervention Type DEVICE

PFC Sigma Fixed Bearing system for use in total knee arthroplasty

PFC Sigma Mobile Bearing

PFC Sigma Mobile Bearing system for use in total knee arthroplasty

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PFC Sigma Mobile Bearing

Intervention Type DEVICE

PFC Sigma Mobile Bearing system for use in total knee arthroplasty

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PFC Sigma Fixed Bearing

PFC Sigma Fixed Bearing system for use in total knee arthroplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

PFC Sigma Mobile Bearing

PFC Sigma Mobile Bearing system for use in total knee arthroplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Administrative - The patient or their authorised representative is able to understand the evaluation, is able to give voluntary written informed consent and will comply with the post operative follow up regime.
2. Age - There are no restrictions relating to age of the patient. The patient's age must be considered suitable by the clinical investigator for a bi-compartmental or tri-compartmental knee arthroplasty using either of the two systems available in the evaluation.
3. Sex - Male or female (providing that they are not pregnant) may be recruited to the evaluation.
4. Diagnosis - patients that require a tri-compartmental knee arthroplasty for primary surgical management of idiopathic osteoarthritis.
5. Suitability - Patients who in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator are considered to be suitable for treatment with a fixed or mobile bearing tibial knee system and are suitable for patella resurfacing.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
2. Patients requiring revision total knee arthroplasty surgery.
3. Patients with any tibial deformity requiring tibial component augmentation.
4. Patients that in the opinion of the clinical investigators require a constrained prosthesis.
5. Patients with a known history of poor compliance to medical treatment.
6. Patients who are known drug or alcohol abusers.
7. Patients with a pathology which in the opinion of the clinical investigator will adversely affect healing.
8. Patients who are currently participating in another clinical evaluation.
9. Patients with other disorders which in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator will / could impair rehabilitation.
10. Contra-indications for use of the device, as detailed in the package insert.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

DePuy International

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Middlesborough General Hospital

Middlesbrough, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CT0101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sigma CR150 Versus Sigma CR Knee RCT
NCT01418378 COMPLETED PHASE4
VEGA Prospective Kiel
NCT02802085 COMPLETED