Ivabradine Versus Beta-blockers in the Treatment of Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia

NCT ID: NCT01657136

Last Updated: 2016-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the effectiveness and safety of ivabradine and beta-blockers in the treatment of inappropriate sinus tachycardia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) is a non-paroxysmal arrhythmia, characterized by a persistently high sinus heart rate (HR) and/or an exaggerated HR response to minimal exertion, and can be responsible for palpitations, asthenia, chest pain, dizziness and syncope, which can be highly invalidating. Conventional treatment of IST, targeted to symptoms control, mainly consists on β-blockers. However, these drugs are often insufficient or not well tolerated because of side effects (mostly hypotension) that usually limit the administered dose. Ivabradine, a sinus rate lowering agent currently employed in Europe in the treatment of stable angina and chronic heart failure, has recently been demonstrated to be effective and safe in the treatment of IST by a few case reports and clinical trials. A randomized clinical trial comparing ivabradine to β-blockers has not be performed yet.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ivabradine

Ivabradine will be initiated at a dose of 5 mg twice daily. Dosage should be augmented up to 7.5 mg twice daily in case of symptoms persistence and/or HR \> 85 bpm at rest ECG and eventually lowered up to 2.5 mg twice daily in the presence of side effects (phosphenes, diplopia and symptomatic bradycardia).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ivabradine

Intervention Type DRUG

comparison of different drugs

Beta blocker (Bisoprololo)

Bisoprololo will be initiated at a single dose of 5 mg daily. Dosage should be augmented up to 10 mg single dose daily in case of symptoms persistence and/or HR \> 85 bpm at rest ECG and eventually lowered up to 2,5 mg single dose daily in the presence of side effects (symptomatic bradycardia, hypotension).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Beta blocker

Intervention Type DRUG

comparison of different drugs

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ivabradine

comparison of different drugs

Intervention Type DRUG

Beta blocker

comparison of different drugs

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (HR \>100 bpm at rest ECG and/or medium Holter ECG HR \>90 bpm)
* Age \> 18 years;

Exclusion Criteria

* Secondary causes of sinus tachycardia;
* Structural heart diseases,
* Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome;
* Sinus nodal reentrant tachycardia;
* Contraindications to beta-blockers;
* Administration of beta-blockers, non-di-hydropiridinic calcium channels antagonists, class I and III anti-arrhythmic drugs or digitalis at the time of enrollment;
* Age \< 18 years;
* Inability of giving informed consent;
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Policlinico Casilino ASL RMB

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Leonardo Calo

Director of clinical arrhythmology and cardiac electrophysiology department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Leonardo Calò, FESC MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Policlinico Casilino

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Policlinico Casilino

Rome, Rome, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Calo L, Rebecchi M, Sette A, Martino A, de Ruvo E, Sciarra L, De Luca L, Zuccaro LM, Giunta G, Ciccaglioni A, Lioy E, Fedele F. Efficacy of ivabradine administration in patients affected by inappropriate sinus tachycardia. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Sep;7(9):1318-23. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.05.034. Epub 2010 Jun 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20621618 (View on PubMed)

Ptaszynski P, Kaczmarek K, Ruta J, Klingenheben T, Wranicz JK. Metoprolol succinate vs. ivabradine in the treatment of inappropriate sinus tachycardia in patients unresponsive to previous pharmacological therapy. Europace. 2013 Jan;15(1):116-21. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus204. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22772053 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Casilino0001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Beta-blockers in i-PAH
NCT01246037 UNKNOWN PHASE1/PHASE2