Heart Rate Control Before Cardiac Computed Tomography in Adults for the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease

NCT ID: NCT07268170

Last Updated: 2025-12-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

350 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-15

Study Completion Date

2028-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to describe which type and dose of commonly used heart rate reducing drugs (metoprolol, atenolol, or ivabradine) has the swiftest heart rate reduction from baseline in patients aged 30 to 80 years with a heart rate \> 65 beats per minute undergoing cardiac computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease. The main question it aims to answer is

• Which type of heart reducing drug and dose has the swiftest heart rate reduction before cardiac computed tomography?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial will include patients undergoing cardiac computed tomography. Two phases will be conducted: a pilot study (dose-finding phase) and a randomized trial (superiority phase). In the first dose-finding phase participants (N=150) will be randomized 1:1 in six arms (arms contain lower and higher doses of atenolol, metoprolol and ivabradine). Following an interim analysis, a superiority phase will be conducted using two parallel groups, non-diabetics (N=100) and diabetics (N=100), in a placebo-controlled head-to-head randomized 2:2:1 three-arms trial comparing the fastest betablocker and dose and the fastest dose of ivabradine from the dose-finding phase.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD) Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Initial dose-finding pilot study using a controlled, double-blind, 6 armed 1:1 randomized design.

Followed by a sequential controlled, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of most effective betablocker and ivabradine dose among a subgroup of diabetics and non-diabetics undergoing cardiac computed tomography.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Metoprololtartrat 50 mg

Strategy 1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

atenolol

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Ivabradine

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Metoprololtartrat 100 mg

Strategy 1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

atenolol

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Ivabradine

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Atenolol 50 mg

Strategy 1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Metoprolol tartrate

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Ivabradine

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Atenolol 100 mg

Strategy 1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Metoprolol tartrate

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Ivabradine

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Ivabradine 15 mg

Strategy 1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

atenolol

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Metoprolol tartrate

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Ivabradine 7.5 mg

Strategy 1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

atenolol

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Metoprolol tartrate

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Fastest dose of betablocker (atenolol 50/100 mg or metoprololtartrat 50/100 mg)

Strategy 2

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ivabradine 7.5/15 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Fastest dose of Ivabradine (Ivabradine 7.5/15 mg)

Strategy 2

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Atenolol/Metoprolol tartrate

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Placebo

Strategy 2

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Atenolol/Metoprolol tartrate

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Ivabradine 7.5/15 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

atenolol

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Intervention Type DRUG

Metoprolol tartrate

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Intervention Type DRUG

Ivabradine

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Intervention Type DRUG

Atenolol/Metoprolol tartrate

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Intervention Type DRUG

Ivabradine 7.5/15 mg

No studies have compared metoprololtartrat, ivabradine, atenolol and placebo in different doses as drugs before cardiac computed tomography

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Individuals who are to undergo Cardiac CT
* Sinus rhythm with heart rate \> 65 bpm on ECG
* Competent patients who have given written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \> 80 years
* Age \< 30 years
* Heart rate \> 100 bpm
* BMI \> 35
* Previous percutaneous coronary intervention (with or without stent)
* Previous CABG
* Known ischemic heart disease
* Pacemaker
* Acute coronary syndrome
* Known allergy to beta-blockers
* Known allergy to ivabradine
* Known allergy to used radiographic contrast agents
* Pregnant, including potentially pregnant, or breastfeeding (potentially pregnant patients will undergo pregnancy testing)
* Heart failure with systolic left ventricular ejection fraction \< 45%
* Reduced kidney function with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 40 ml/min
* Regular treatment with beta-blockers
* Regular treatment with ivabradine
* Regular treatment with non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonists (Verapamil and Diltiazem)
* Regular treatment with Cordarone
* Contraindications for beta-blockers or ivabradine:
* Severe asthma
* Severe COPD
* Sick sinus syndrome
* Sinoatrial block (1st degree AV block)
* Advanced AV block (2nd or 3rd degree)
* Hypotension (systolic blood pressure \< 110 mmHg)
* Severe heart failure
* Severe restrictive cardiomyopathy
* Severe aortic stenosis
* Severe circulatory disturbances
* Severe metabolic conditions
* Untreated pheochromocytoma
* Concurrent treatment with potent inhibitors of CYP3A4
* Concurrent treatment with potent inhibitors of MAO inhibitors,
* Concurrent treatment with potent inhibitors of CYP2D6 inhibitors
* Concurrent treatment with potent inhibitors of intravenous calcium antagonists type I or III
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Department of Cardiology, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gødstrup Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Morten Böttcher, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University Clinic of Ishemic Heart Disease, Gødstrup Hospital

Simon Winther, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Clinic of Ishemic Heart Disease, Gødstrup Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Clinic of Ischemic Heart Disease

Herning, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2025-522741-21-00

Identifier Type: CTIS

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2025-522741-21-00

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id