Longitudinal Measures of Leptin in Pregnant Women Who Developed Preeclampsia
NCT ID: NCT01649167
Last Updated: 2012-07-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
55 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-02-28
2010-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aim: to measure leptin in lean, obese and diabetic pregnant women at three months intervals throughout their pregnancies.
Methods: Pregnant women were recruited in the 1st trimester of pregnancy, and three groups were formed: a) with pregestational Body Mass Index (BMI) less than 25 kg/m2, b) BMI higher than 25 kg/m2 and c) with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM). Serum levels of leptin were measured with radioimmunoassay (RIA) technique.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Preeclampsia is a multisystem disorder characterized by pregnancy-induced or gestational hypertension and new-onset proteinuria during the second half of pregnancy.
The aim of this study was to measure leptin in lean, obese and diabetic pregnant women at three-month intervals throughout their pregnancies to determine if this hormone could serve as a prognostic marker for preeclampsia risk.
Recruitment Women were recruited at their first visit at 10-15 weeks gestation. They were asked to attend after an overnight fast and were tested between 0700 and 0900 h. Three groups of pregnant women were formed: a) normal weight (pregestational (PG) BMI \< 25 kg/m2), b) overweight-obese (PGBMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) and c) hyperglycemic in the first trimester of pregnancy confirmed as GDM in women previously known to be normoglycemic. Positive cases for preeclampsia were then subdivided.
Clinical follow-up Three examinations were performed in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimesters. In each visit, the women were weighed. Blood pressure (BP) was recorded at each visit using a standard sphygmomanometer and appropriately sized cuff. If diagnosed with pregnancy-induced hypertension, the women were hospitalized and clinically supervised with an electronic monitor (Mercury, Mennem Medical) until the diagnosis of preeclampsia was confirmed or excluded.
Laboratory During each consult, blood samples were collected in Vacutainer tubes after a fasting period of 8 hours and centrifuged to separate the plasma from serum. The investigators measured albumin (mg/dl), cholesterol (mg/dl), creatinine (mg/dl), glucose (mg/dl), triglycerides (mg/dl), uric acid (mg/dl), liver enzymes (Dimension Rx L Max, Dade Behring), and hemoglobin (g/dl) (Advia 120, Bayer Health) and performed a general urine test (URiSCAN Pro). These tests were measured in the HMPMP according to standardized procedures recommended by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC).
Diagnosis of GDM At the time of recruitment, women with hyperglycemia who fulfilled the criteria and were recently diagnosed with diabetes were included in the same group as those women who were submitted to an OGT after 24 weeks' gestation and confirmed to have GDM because they had normal values of glucose prior to their pregnancies.
During pregnancy follow-up, gynecologists at the obstetric outpatient clinic used the following risk factors to screen women for GDM: a first-degree relative with diabetes, a history of GDM or macrosomia, a suspicion of macrosomia in the current pregnancy, persistent glucosuria, a rapid or excessive weight gain during early pregnancy, obesity or a random plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/l. Women with one or more of these factors underwent the standard 100 g 3-h OGTT after an overnight fast (solution provided by Laboratorio Silanes).
The diagnosis of GDM was made according to the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria (≥ 2 abnormal values; glucose concentrations of ≥ 5.8 mmol/l for fasting, ≥ 10.6 mmol/l at 1 h, ≥ 9.2 mmol/l at 2 h, and ≥ 8.1 mmol/l at 3 h) \[16\].
In women with GDM, the therapeutic aims were blood glucose levels before meals \< 5.0 mmol/l and 2 h postprandial \< 6.5 mmol/l. If two blood glucose levels in one to two weeks were above these aims despite adequate dietary measures, then insulin of the rapid type was started or doses were increased. If these measures were insufficient to reach the therapeutic aims, then basal insulin was added.
Preeclampsia was diagnosed and classified according to the criteria specified by the technical bulletin of the ACOG and the National High Blood Pressure Education Program (NHBPEP) Working Group Report on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Hypertension was described as an increase of 30 mm Hg systolic or 15 mm Hg diastolic BP as compared to the values before 20 weeks of pregnancy, or an absolute BP \> 140/90 mm Hg after 20 weeks gestation if the earlier values were unknown.
Leptin Serum levels of leptin (Millipore/Linco., USA, Cat. HL-8IHK) and adiponectin (Millipore/Linco., USA, Cat. No. HADP-61HK) were determined by means of a double antibody radioimmunoassay (RIA) using materials and protocols supplied by the provider (Millipore/Linco., USA, Cat. HL-8IHK). All samples of each trimester were assayed simultaneously. The assays were run according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Statistical analysis It was used the SPSS version 16. Continuous variables were expressed in means ± standard deviation (SD). Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were considered statistically significant with a P value ≤ 0.05. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used with each variable and in the cases of preeclampsia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Overweight/obesity
Pregnant women with overweight/obesity
No interventions assigned to this group
gestational diabetes
Pregnant women with gestational diabetes
No interventions assigned to this group
normal weight
Pregnant women with normal weight
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
46 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico
OTHER
Materno-Perinatal Hospital of the State of Mexico
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hugo Mendieta Zeron
Researcher of the Medical Research Center (CICMED)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Verónica Jackeline García Solorio, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Autonomous University of the State of Mexico
Hugo Mendieta Zerón, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Autonomous University of the State of Mexico
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MACSSD042010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id