Feasibility Study for Enhancing Gait Following Stroke With Implanted Microstimulators
NCT ID: NCT01640041
Last Updated: 2017-01-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-05-31
2010-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Enhancing Function Using the RF Microstimulator Gait System Following Stroke 2008
NCT00864708
Clinical Implementation of Multichannel Functional Electrical Stimulation Device for Gait Rehabilitation in Subchronic Stroke: A Feasibility Study
NCT07211672
Effectiveness of Multichannel Functional Electrical Stimulation
NCT04876703
Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) for Upper Extremity Recovery in Stroke
NCT00142792
Implant for Walking After Stroke
NCT05740540
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The similarities between the RFM-based and percutaneous FNS systems will be assessed using six gait components required for the execution of functional, safe gait, which are lower limb strength, coordination, an index of walking endurance, muscle tone, walking speed, and quality of life.
The secondary objective of this study is to test the technological performance and safety of the RFM Gait System. Measures of technology performance and safety include implantation time; anchoring capability at the motor point of the muscle; reliability of the RFMs during use; reliability of electrical performance of the system; comfort of the system (with stimulation off); comfort of the electrical stimulus.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Implanted
All participants.
Radio-frequency Microstiumulator
All participants will receive leg implants and will be trained first in the clinical and subsequently perform stimulation-assisted exercises in the home - for an overall duration of 6 months post-implant. Subsequently, exercise programs will continue without stimulation. Patient condition will be assessed at 9, 12 and 24 months post-implant.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Radio-frequency Microstiumulator
All participants will receive leg implants and will be trained first in the clinical and subsequently perform stimulation-assisted exercises in the home - for an overall duration of 6 months post-implant. Subsequently, exercise programs will continue without stimulation. Patient condition will be assessed at 9, 12 and 24 months post-implant.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Sufficient endurance to participate in rehabilitation sessions.
3. Ability to follow 2 stage commands, in English.
4. Medically stable.
5. Age \> 21 years.
6. Impaired ambulation as follows: inability to flex the knee and ankle in the sagittal plane, in a normal manner so the foot clears the floor, inability to control normal knee angle during single limb weight bearing during stance phase .
7. Minimum trace (Manual Muscle Test score of 1) contraction of hip, knee, and ankle flexors and extensors under volitional control.
8. Passive range of motion at hip, knee, ankle normal gait kinematics.
9. Five degrees (5°) of motion for knee and ankle flexors and extensors produced by muscle stimulation achieved non-invasively with electrical stimulation applied to the skin surface.
10. At least 12 months post stroke.
11. Ability to understand the informed consent form in English.
12. Thigh and lower leg circumference and length ≤ 50th percentile of standard U.S. population morphology measures.\*
13. Participants should be able to walk and keep balance without physical assistance
14. Response to Surface Stimulation at a trace for tibialis anterior and peronous longus.
15. Subject with unilateral defects
Exclusion Criteria
2. Active psychiatric diagnosis or psychological condition, or active drug/alcohol abuse.
3. Lower motor neuron damage or radiculopathy.
4. More than one stroke.
5. Allergy or contraindication to the anesthesia, Versed, (or comparable substitute).
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
The Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Janis J Daly, PhD, MSPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cleveland VA Medical Center
Robert Ruff, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cleveland VA Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
VA Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Daly JJ, Roenigk K, Holcomb J, Rogers JM, Butler K, Gansen J, McCabe J, Fredrickson E, Marsolais EB, Ruff RL. A randomized controlled trial of functional neuromuscular stimulation in chronic stroke subjects. Stroke. 2006 Jan;37(1):172-8. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000195129.95220.77. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
Daly JJ, Ruff RL. Feasibility of combining multi-channel functional neuromuscular stimulation with weight-supported treadmill training. J Neurol Sci. 2004 Oct 15;225(1-2):105-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2004.07.006.
Daly JJ, Kollar K, Debogorski AA, Strasshofer B, Marsolais EB, Scheiner A, Snyder S, Ruff RL. Performance of an intramuscular electrode during functional neuromuscular stimulation for gait training post stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001 Sep-Oct;38(5):513-26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GO70151
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
AMF-CP-0004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.