De-escalation of Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy Study in Severe Sepsis

NCT ID: NCT01626612

Last Updated: 2015-04-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-29

Study Completion Date

2013-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rational: Severe sepsis is one of the leading cause of mortality in intensive care unit patients. Early initiation of an appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy is associated with improved outcomes. In order to avoid an increase of selection pressure and the emergence of multidrug resistant pathogens, guidelines recommend to streamline the antimicrobial therapy after the identification of the pathogen responsible for infection. This strategy has been evaluated in several observational studies. However, at the bedside, few randomized clinical trials tested this strategy prospectively.

Method: the investigators conduct a randomized clinical trial comparing a strategy based on de-escalation (streamlining of the empirical antimicrobial therapy) and a conservative strategy (continuation of the empirical antimicrobial therapy). The investigators first aim was to show that a strategy based on de-escalation is not inferior to a conservative strategy in terms of intensive care unit length of stay. Secondary aims are to compare the rate of mortality rate, the emergence of multidrug resistant pathogens, and the feasibility of de-escalation. The study is performed in nine intensive care units from four institutions, and 120 patients are required to validate the investigators hypothesis. New technologies for the rapid diagnosis of severe infections are investigated in an ancillary study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Severe Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

a strategy based on de-escalation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

streamlining of the empirical antimicrobial therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ALL THE ANTIBACTERIAL IN WORN SYSTEMATIC

a conservative strategy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

continuation of the empirical antimicrobial therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ALL THE ANTIBACTERIAL IN WORN SYSTEMATIC

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

continuation of the empirical antimicrobial therapy

ALL THE ANTIBACTERIAL IN WORN SYSTEMATIC

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

streamlining of the empirical antimicrobial therapy

ALL THE ANTIBACTERIAL IN WORN SYSTEMATIC

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Major Subject;
* Subject having a sepsis engraves(burns) defined according to the following criteria during the initiation of the probability antibiotic treatment:
* Criteria of SIRS \[ 14 \],
* And a suspected infection,
* And a failure of organ: low blood pressure, respiratory failure, coma, hepatic insufficiency, renal insufficiency, thrombopénia, spontaneous extension of the TCA,
* Subject for which an antibiotic treatment was begun within 6 hours following the diagnosis of sepsis engraves(burns);
* Subject for which a taking with microbiological aim was made within 48 hours following the diagnosis of sepsis

Exclusion Criteria

* Minor Subject, pregnant or breast-feeding woman;
* Neutropénia (PN \< 1000 / mm3);
* Absence of identification of a microorganism in the microbiological examinations;
* Absence of Social Security;
* Subject deprived of freedom or under guardianship;
* Subject for which the lit(enlightened) consent is not collected(taken in) (itself and/or reliable person).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

BERNARD BELAIGUES

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assistance Publique hôpitaux de Marseille

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011 -10

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2011-002297-22

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Aminoglycosides in Early Sepsis
NCT06712641 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE4