De-escalation of Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy Study in Severe Sepsis
NCT ID: NCT01626612
Last Updated: 2015-04-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-02-29
2013-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Method: the investigators conduct a randomized clinical trial comparing a strategy based on de-escalation (streamlining of the empirical antimicrobial therapy) and a conservative strategy (continuation of the empirical antimicrobial therapy). The investigators first aim was to show that a strategy based on de-escalation is not inferior to a conservative strategy in terms of intensive care unit length of stay. Secondary aims are to compare the rate of mortality rate, the emergence of multidrug resistant pathogens, and the feasibility of de-escalation. The study is performed in nine intensive care units from four institutions, and 120 patients are required to validate the investigators hypothesis. New technologies for the rapid diagnosis of severe infections are investigated in an ancillary study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Beta-lactam Intermittent Versus Continuous Infusion and Combination Antibiotic Therapy in Sepsis
NCT05681442
Antibiotic De-escalation in Onco-hematology Patients for Sepsis or Septic Shock
NCT03683329
Descriptive Study of the Evolution in Proportion of Regulatory B Lymphocytes in Patients Hospitalized in Intensive Care for Severe Sepsis
NCT03115125
Empiric Antibiotic Treatment for Septic Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
NCT05924126
Adrenomedullin and Outcome in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
NCT02393781
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
a strategy based on de-escalation
streamlining of the empirical antimicrobial therapy
ALL THE ANTIBACTERIAL IN WORN SYSTEMATIC
a conservative strategy
continuation of the empirical antimicrobial therapy
ALL THE ANTIBACTERIAL IN WORN SYSTEMATIC
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
continuation of the empirical antimicrobial therapy
ALL THE ANTIBACTERIAL IN WORN SYSTEMATIC
streamlining of the empirical antimicrobial therapy
ALL THE ANTIBACTERIAL IN WORN SYSTEMATIC
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject having a sepsis engraves(burns) defined according to the following criteria during the initiation of the probability antibiotic treatment:
* Criteria of SIRS \[ 14 \],
* And a suspected infection,
* And a failure of organ: low blood pressure, respiratory failure, coma, hepatic insufficiency, renal insufficiency, thrombopénia, spontaneous extension of the TCA,
* Subject for which an antibiotic treatment was begun within 6 hours following the diagnosis of sepsis engraves(burns);
* Subject for which a taking with microbiological aim was made within 48 hours following the diagnosis of sepsis
Exclusion Criteria
* Neutropénia (PN \< 1000 / mm3);
* Absence of identification of a microorganism in the microbiological examinations;
* Absence of Social Security;
* Subject deprived of freedom or under guardianship;
* Subject for which the lit(enlightened) consent is not collected(taken in) (itself and/or reliable person).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
BERNARD BELAIGUES
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assistance Publique hôpitaux de Marseille
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille
Marseille, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011 -10
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2011-002297-22
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.