To Scan or Not to Scan: The Role of Follow-up CT Scanning for Management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma After Neurosurgical Evacuation
NCT ID: NCT01624545
Last Updated: 2017-02-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
368 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-06-01
2017-02-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The optimal follow-up for operated patients remains controversial. Due to the known high rate of a second hematoma at the same place (usually within weeks), one strategy is to perform serial computer tomography scans in order to identify recurrent hematomas early. The radiologic evidence of a second hematoma often leads to reoperation, even if the patient has no, or just slight symptoms. Another strategy after surgical hematoma evacuation is to closely follow the patient with neurological examinations and perform neuroimaging only in case of new symptoms. Advocators of this strategy argue that a follow-up with routine CT scans may be harmful due to additional and maybe unnecessary surgeries and hospital days in a patient population marked by advanced age and fragility.
The aim of the current study is to evaluate the role of computer tomography scanning in the postoperative follow-up after removal of a chronic subdural hematoma. Participants of this study will be allocated by chance to one of two study groups: Patients allocated to group A will receive a computer tomography scan on day 2 and again on day 30 after surgery in addition to a clinical examination. Patients allocated to group B will be examined clinically on day 2 and day 30 without computer tomography. All patients will undergo a final clinical examination after 6 months. The study will recruit 400 patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Irrigation of Chronic Subdural Hematomas - is More Better?
NCT01930617
A National Study Examining the Most Effective Drainage Method After Burr Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma
NCT06621407
Mgt of Chronic Subdural Hematoma Using Dexamethasone
NCT02938468
Spinal CSF Leaks in Chronic Subdural Hematoma
NCT06323434
Dexamethasone Versus Burr Hole Craniostomy for Symptomatic Chronic Subdural Hematoma
NCT02111785
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSH) is one of the most common intracranial bleedings in patients over 60 years of age and a frequently found neurosurgical entity. Age related brain atrophy leads to enlargement of the subarachnoid space, a space limited by the dura mater and the arachnoid membrane. Blood vessels that occupy this space are being stretched and may rupture after a minor head trauma. Although the resulting bleeding itself is often without noticeable consequence for the patient, the anatomical outcome may be serious as it enlarges the subdural space. The formation of new leaky capillary-like vessels and/or volume enhancing osmotic gradients lead to the enlargement of the subdural hematoma over weeks, filling the intracranial space and compressing the brain. Headaches, gait disturbances, language problems, hemiparesis and decreased consciousness are among the many presenting symptoms and tend to develop over days or weeks.
Computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head typically reveals the blood accumulation in the subdural space. Standard treatment includes the evacuation of the subdural blood through burr holes (see below) under either local or general anesthesia. In cases when a hematoma clot cannot be evacuated through burr holes a small craniotomy is performed. CSH is feared for its high recurrence rate (between 9 and 27%) that mostly occurs within 3 months of the initial operation.
The optimal follow-up course for operated patients remains controversial. Due to the high rate of recurrences, one strategy is to perform serial CT scans in order to identify recurrent hematomas early. The radiologic evidence of a recurrent or significant persistent hematoma often leads to reoperation. Another strategy after surgical hematoma evacuation is to closely follow the patient with neurological examinations and perform neuroimaging only in case of persistent or new neurologic deficits. Advocators of this strategy argue that follow up with routine CT scans may be harmful due to additional and maybe unnecessary surgeries and hospital days in a patient population marked by advanced age and fragility.
However, even when neuroimaging is done routinely, no correlation has been observed between the radiologic evidence of a hematoma remnant and the reoperation rate. This observation has been reported by Mori and Maeda in a retrospective analysis of 500 patients. Some persistent hematoma is almost always seen after the surgical intervention and there seems to be a correlation between the re-expansion rate of the brain and the likelihood of hematoma recurrence. However, the correlation is weak and of little practical value for patient treatment. The high incidence of hematoma remnants in post-op imaging complicates the indication for re-operation of a recurrent CSH solely by imaging criteria. Since the presence and the amount of remnant hematoma after the operation is a poor predictor of future recurrent hematoma some clinicians refrain from postoperative CT scans and rely solely on neurological assessments. If patients become symptomatic, serial CT scans are performed and surgery is scheduled in cases of persistent, enlarging or new hematoma. The discrepancy in follow-up strategy reflects our current incomplete understanding of the pathophysiology of CSH and its recurrence.
The aim of the current study is to evaluate the role of CT scanning in the postoperative treatment course after neurosurgical evacuation of CSH in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Objective
The hypothesis of interest to test in this trial is that a follow-up protocol without any CT scan is not inferior to a follow-up protocol with serial CT scans after neurosurgical evacuation of CSH as assessed with the modified Rankin scale at 6 months. Additional hypotheses of interest are that the size/volume/features of the hematoma rest/remnant in an early (\<72 hours) CT scan after neurosurgical evacuation is not correlated to the neurological status of the patient and that the size/volume/features of the hematoma rest/remnant on post-op CT scans is not predictive for reoperation.
Methods
Patients will be screened and included into this study within 48 hours after surgery for a chronic subdural hematoma (burr hole trepanation and insertion of drainage). Study patients are randomized (1:1) on day 2 after surgery into CT-Scan arm (group A) or Clinical arm (group B). A CT scan is scheduled for patients of group A on day 2 and 30 after surgery. Patients of both study groups (A and B) will receive a neurological follow-up examination at day 2, 30 days and 6 months after surgery. Regardless of randomization all patients will receive CT scanning if judged necessary on clinical grounds at any time.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Patients in this study arm will receive a cranial CT scan on day 2 and day 30 after evacuation of a chronic subdural hematoma in addition to neurological evaluation on day 2 and 30.
cranial CT scan
Patients in this study arm will receive a cranial CT scan on day 2 and day 30 after evacuation of a chronic subdural hematoma in addition to neurological evaluation on day 2 and 30.
2
Patients in this study arm will undergo neurological evaluation on day 2 and day 30 without follow-up CT scan.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cranial CT scan
Patients in this study arm will receive a cranial CT scan on day 2 and day 30 after evacuation of a chronic subdural hematoma in addition to neurological evaluation on day 2 and 30.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18 years or older
* Written informed consent from the patient to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Foreseeable difficulties in follow-up due to geographic reasons (e.g. patients living abroad)
* Recurrent hematoma if the first surgery was performed before study start
* CSH due to spontaneous spinal CSF fistula or meningeosis carcinomatosa
* Pregnancy
* Patient with Metastatic Disease and a high possibility to pass away in the next 6 month
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philippe E Schucht, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Inselspital Bern, University Bern
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Neurosurgery
Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mori K, Maeda M. Surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma in 500 consecutive cases: clinical characteristics, surgical outcome, complications, and recurrence rate. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2001 Aug;41(8):371-81. doi: 10.2176/nmc.41.371.
Torihashi K, Sadamasa N, Yoshida K, Narumi O, Chin M, Yamagata S. Independent predictors for recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma: a review of 343 consecutive surgical cases. Neurosurgery. 2008 Dec;63(6):1125-9; discussion 1129. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000335782.60059.17.
Forster MT, Mathe AK, Senft C, Scharrer I, Seifert V, Gerlach R. The influence of preoperative anticoagulation on outcome and quality of life after surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. J Clin Neurosci. 2010 Aug;17(8):975-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.11.023. Epub 2010 May 23.
Abouzari M, Rashidi A, Rezaii J, Esfandiari K, Asadollahi M, Aleali H, Abdollahzadeh M. The role of postoperative patient posture in the recurrence of traumatic chronic subdural hematoma after burr-hole surgery. Neurosurgery. 2007 Oct;61(4):794-7; discussion 797. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000298908.94129.67.
Oishi M, Toyama M, Tamatani S, Kitazawa T, Saito M. Clinical factors of recurrent chronic subdural hematoma. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2001 Aug;41(8):382-6. doi: 10.2176/nmc.41.382.
Santarius T, Kirkpatrick PJ, Ganesan D, Chia HL, Jalloh I, Smielewski P, Richards HK, Marcus H, Parker RA, Price SJ, Kirollos RW, Pickard JD, Hutchinson PJ. Use of drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1067-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61115-6.
Lee HY, Ju YM, Lee MH, Lee SJ, Chang WH, Imm CW. A case of post-traumatic coronary occlusion. Korean J Intern Med. 1991 Jan;6(1):33-7. doi: 10.3904/kjim.1991.6.1.33.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2179
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
218/10
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.