Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-09-30
2014-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Following from the above study, the investigators would like to extend this study on patients who have functional constipation and previously have not responded to conventional laxatives.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
MRI and Microbiota Analysis in Constipation
NCT02144376
A Multi-centre Study Comparing the Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Types of Bowel Preparation: a 2-litre Solution (MOVIPREP®) Versus a Hyperosmotic and Stimulant Combined Low Volume Bowel Preparation (Sodium Picosulfate and Magnesium Citrate)
NCT01689792
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus MOVIPREP® Using 2-Day Split-Dosing and 1-Day Morning Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults.
NCT02273167
Pharmacodynamic and Clinical Evaluation of Dose and Taste-optimised Low Volume PEG-based Bowel Cleansing Solutions Using the Split-dosing Intake Regimen in Healthy Subjects and in Subjects Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy
NCT01714466
Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerance of Experimental Morning-only MOVIPREP® Bowel Preparation in Comparison With Split-dose With Nocturnal Pause MOVIPREP® Bowel Preparation
NCT01732692
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Previous MRI studies using a Mannitol solution of 300 mosmols/l resulted in a small bowel secretion of fluid increasing total small bowel water to nearly 400 mls after a 300 ml meal. The investigators would anticipate a much larger increase after the hypertonic Moviprep. The flush of small bowel fluid induced by mannitol produces a radical change in the heterogeneous structure of the ascending colon as shown in our recent MRI images of the colon before and after mannitol.
Contrary to expectation colonic contents are far from homogenous with a spatially organised bacterial flora which others have described at a microscopic level which the investigators are just beginning to demonstrate using their novel MRI techniques. The colon should be regarded as a complex bioreactor which is spatially highly organised with a mucous layer overlying the enterocytes, the outer layer of mucus containing a germinal layer with bacteria which reseed the bioreactor when it is purged. The rate of recovery after purgation with polyethylene glycol is said to be normally rapid as the intact germinal layer rapidly recolonises but slower in certain patient groups though data is very limited as yet. The anecdotal yet persuasive patient accounts of improvement in bowel function after colonic lavage suggest that the reconstituted microbiota may be different, though this has yet to be studied using modern techniques.
Until recently the investigators have had no way of noninvasive imaging this complex structure but recent developments of high resolution MRI in Nottingham show that this is now feasible. Pilot data demonstrates that purging removes the heterogeneous three dimensional structure leaving homogeneous fluid contents with an intense proton signal. Just how this impacts on the colonic microbiota is as yet unknown as there have been no studies to date combining these novel approaches with new techniques now available for assessing the microbiota.
Early culture-based assessments identify only a minority of all the faecal organisms present and it is only in the last decade that methods based on assessment of microbial DNA have evolved to make it possible to describe the full complexity of the faecal microbiota. PCR of the highly conserved 16s ribosomal RNA gene shows the microbiota of individuals to be highly complex and individualised. Similarity indices show similarities of around two thirds over a 7 week period in healthy controls while those developing acute diarrhoea due to radiation enteritis show a marked reduction to just 26%. Similarly, HITChip analysis showed that subjects with IBS had an unstable microbiota that was stabilised following a probiotic intervention trial that improved the IBS symptom score. These techniques have yet to be applied to subjects undergoing bowel purgation. Moreover, there are novel approaches to identify the viability of the microbiota such as the use of specific probes that allow discrimination between intact, damaged and dead cells in fecal samples.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
Healthy volunteers in Group 1: To give sachet's A and B made up to 1 litre with tap water once on day 1 and once on day 2
Polyethyleneglycol
Group 1 sachet's A and B made up to 1 litre with tap water once on day 1 and once on day 2. Group 2 2x sachet's A and B made up to 2 litres with tap water on day 1. Group 3 sachet's A and B made up to 1 litre with tap water once on day 1.
Group 2
Healthy volunteers in group 2: To give 2x sachet's A and B made up to 2 litres with tap water on day 1.
Polyethyleneglycol
Group 1 sachet's A and B made up to 1 litre with tap water once on day 1 and once on day 2. Group 2 2x sachet's A and B made up to 2 litres with tap water on day 1. Group 3 sachet's A and B made up to 1 litre with tap water once on day 1.
Group 3
Patients with functional constipation and irritable bowel syndrome characterized by constipation: To give sachet's A and B made up to 1 litre with tap water once on day 1
Polyethyleneglycol
Group 1 sachet's A and B made up to 1 litre with tap water once on day 1 and once on day 2. Group 2 2x sachet's A and B made up to 2 litres with tap water on day 1. Group 3 sachet's A and B made up to 1 litre with tap water once on day 1.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Polyethyleneglycol
Group 1 sachet's A and B made up to 1 litre with tap water once on day 1 and once on day 2. Group 2 2x sachet's A and B made up to 2 litres with tap water on day 1. Group 3 sachet's A and B made up to 1 litre with tap water once on day 1.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* BMI 18-28 kg/m2
* Able to give voluntary written informed consent to participate in the study
* Able to understand the requirements of the study, including anonymous publication, and agree to co-operate with the study procedures
* Male or female who are 18-65 years
* BMI 18-30 kg/m2
* Able to give voluntary written informed consent to participate in the study
* Able to understand the requirements of the study, including anonymous publication, and agree to co-operate with the study procedures
* Patient diagnosed with constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome who failed to respond to at least 1 laxative treatment in the past
* Patient diagnosed with functional constipation who failed to respond to 1-2 sachets of Movicol per day
Exclusion Criteria
* Diabetes Mellitus
* Pregnancy or breast feeding
* Smoking
* Unsuitable for MRI scanning (i.e. have metal implants or a pace maker)
* Regular use of medication interfering with gastrointestinal function including opiates or constipating drugs
* Subjects using the oral contraceptive pill will be excluded if not prepared to use an alternative barrier method of contraception for the duration of the menstrual cycle following dosing with Moviprep
* Substance abuse
* Have taken part in another clinical study within the previous 3 months
* Previous gastrointestinal surgery of any kind apart from appendicectomy
* Any history of serious acute or chronic illness especially gastrointestinal
* Diabetes Mellitus
* Pregnancy or breast feeding
* Unsuitable for MRI scanning (i.e. have metal implants or a pace maker)
* Regular use of medication interfering with gastrointestinal function including opiates or constipating drugs
* Subjects using the oral contraceptive pill will be excluded if not prepared to use an alternative barrier method of contraception for the duration of the menstrual cycle following dosing with Moviprep
* Substance abuse
* Have taken part in another clinical study within the previous 3 months
* Previous gastrointestinal surgery of any kind apart from appendicectomy/cholecystectomy
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Norgine
INDUSTRY
University of Nottingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robin Spiller, MD FRCP
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Nottingham
Ching Lam, MBChB MRCP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Nottingham
Klara Garsed, MBChB MRCP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Nottingham
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, University of Nottingham
Nottingham, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010-021879-85
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
10050
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.