A Randomized, Double-blind, Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Amisulpride Versus Low-dose Amisulpride Plus Low-dose Sulpiride in the Treatment of Schizophrenia

NCT ID: NCT01615185

Last Updated: 2016-03-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-01-31

Study Completion Date

2011-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Surveys have shown that antipsychotic drug combinations are frequently prescribed. Amisulpride, an atypical antipsychotic agent, has low incidence of extrapyramidal symptom (EPS) but with high cost compared to sulpiride. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the 800-mg/d amisulpride and 400-mg/d amisulpride plus 800-mg sulpiride in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia.

Method: In this 6-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study, patients with schizophrenia are randomly assigned to amisulpride (800 mg/d) or amisulpride (400 mg/d) plus sulpiride (800 mg/d).The hypothesis is that the two treatment groups have the similar efficacy and safety, but different cost.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Antipsychotic monotherapy is recognized as the treatment of choice for patients with schizophrenia. Surveys have shown that antipsychotic drug combinations are frequently prescribed, yet few clinical studies have examined this practice. Amisulpride, an atypical antipsychotic agent, has low incidence of extrapyramidal symptom (EPS) but with high cost compared to sulpiride. It has been reported that mean doses of low-potency typical antipsychotics less than 600 mg/day of chlorpromazine equivalent dose has no higher risk of EPS than atypical antipsychotics. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the 800-mg/d amisulpride and 400-mg/d amisulpride plus 800-mg sulpiride in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia.

Method: In this 6-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study, patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV diagnosis) are randomly assigned to amisulpride (800 mg/d) or amisulpride (400 mg/d) plus sulpiride (800 mg/d). The hypothesis is that the two treatment groups have the similar efficacy and safety, but different cost. The efficacy assessment was the change from baseline in the score on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and subscales (positive scale, negative scale, general psychopathology scale), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Safety assessments include the change from baseline on Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SAS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS), and UKU Side-effects Rating Scale (UKU), and the change from baseline in prolactin levels, body weight, vital sign, blood pressure, AC glucose level, and lipid profiles(cholesterol, high density lipid protein \[HDL\], low density lipid protein \[LDL\], and triglyceride \[TG\]).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Schizophrenia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

schizophrenia amisulpride sulpiride antipsychotic combination

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

sulpiride plus amisulpride

sulpiride 800mg/d + amisulpride 400mg/d

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

full-dose amisulpride

Intervention Type DRUG

amisulpride 800mg/d

full-dose amisulpride

amisulpride 800mg/d

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

full-dose amisulpride

Intervention Type DRUG

amisulpride 800mg/d

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

full-dose amisulpride

amisulpride 800mg/d

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Solian

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* schizophrenia
* CGI \>=4
* washout of antipsychotics at least 3-5 days
* written informed consents

Exclusion Criteria

* History of serious adverse events to sulpiride or amisulpride
* History of neuroleptic malignant syndrome or tardive dyskinesia to antipsychotics
* treatment-resistant schizophrenia
* long-acting antipsychotics in the past 3 months
* comorbid with substance abuse/dependence
* female subjects with pregnancy
* severe physical illness
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kaohsiung Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ching-Hua Lin, MD, PhD

Chief of Adult Psychiatry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ching-Hua Lin, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leucht S, Wahlbeck K, Hamann J, Kissling W. New generation antipsychotics versus low-potency conventional antipsychotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003 May 10;361(9369):1581-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13306-5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12747876 (View on PubMed)

Kapur S, Seeman P. Does fast dissociation from the dopamine d(2) receptor explain the action of atypical antipsychotics?: A new hypothesis. Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;158(3):360-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.360.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11229973 (View on PubMed)

McKeage K, Plosker GL. Amisulpride: a review of its use in the management of schizophrenia. CNS Drugs. 2004;18(13):933-56. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418130-00007.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15521794 (View on PubMed)

Chakos MH, Glick ID, Miller AL, Hamner MB, Miller DD, Patel JK, Tapp A, Keefe RS, Rosenheck RA. Baseline use of concomitant psychotropic medications to treat schizophrenia in the CATIE trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Aug;57(8):1094-101. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.8.1094.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16870959 (View on PubMed)

Lin CH, Wang FC, Lin SC, Huang YH, Chen CC, Lane HY. Antipsychotic combination using low-dose antipsychotics is as efficacious and safe as, but cheaper, than optimal-dose monotherapy in the treatment of schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Sep;28(5):267-74. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3283633a83.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23778382 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KSPH-2008-13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

KSPH-2008-13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id