Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Risperidone Versus Risperidone Plus Low Dose of Haloperidol in the Treatment of Schizophrenia

NCT ID: NCT00998608

Last Updated: 2009-10-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

88 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-08-31

Study Completion Date

2009-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of risperidone and risperidone plus low dose of haloperidol in the acutely schizophrenic patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Antipsychotic monotherapy is recognized as the treatment of choice for patients with schizophrenia. Surveys have shown that antipsychotic drug combinations are frequently prescribed, yet few clinical studies have examined this practice. Risperidone, an atypical antipsychotics, has low incidence of extrapyramidal symptom (EPS) but with high cost compared to haloperidol. It has been reported that a relatively low daily dose of haloperidol at which individual patients develop slightly increase in EPS and has neurocognitive benefits as risperidone. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the fixed-dosed risperidone and risperidone combined with haloperidol in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia.In this 6-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study, patients with schizophrenic disorder (DSM-IV diagnosis) are randomly assigned to risperidone (4 mg/d) or risperidone (2 mg/d) plus haloperidol (2 mg/d). The hypothesis is that the two treatment groups have the similar efficacy and safety, but different cost. The primary efficacy measure is change from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores; secondary outcomes include Clinical Global Impression-Change (CGI-C), the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenics (CDSS), subject-reported outcomes via the Short Form-36 (SF-36), auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), and cognitive and social functioning. Safety assessments include the change from baseline on Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SAS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS), and UKU Side-effects Rating Scale (UKU), and the change from baseline in prolactin levels, body weight, AC glucose level, lipid panel (cholesterol, high density lipid protein \[HDL\], low density lipid protein \[LDL\], and triglyceride \[TG\])

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Schizophrenia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HR

risperidone 2mg/d + haloperidol 2mg/d

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

risperidone

Intervention Type DRUG

risperidone 4mg/d

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

risperidone

risperidone 4mg/d

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of schizophrenia
* Clinical Global Impression large than 3
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Comorbid of substance abuse/dependence
* Present or history of tardive dyskinesis or neuroleptic malignant syndromes
* Severe physical problems
* pregnant or lactating women
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kaohsiung Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kaohsiung Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Li-Shiu Chou, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tapp A, Wood AE, Secrest L, Erdmann J, Cubberley L, Kilzieh N. Combination antipsychotic therapy in clinical practice. Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Jan;54(1):55-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.1.55.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12509667 (View on PubMed)

Centorrino F, Goren JL, Hennen J, Salvatore P, Kelleher JP, Baldessarini RJ. Multiple versus single antipsychotic agents for hospitalized psychiatric patients: case-control study of risks versus benefits. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;161(4):700-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.4.700.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15056517 (View on PubMed)

Lehman AF, Lieberman JA, Dixon LB, McGlashan TH, Miller AL, Perkins DO, Kreyenbuhl J; American Psychiatric Association; Steering Committee on Practice Guidelines. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, second edition. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;161(2 Suppl):1-56. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15000267 (View on PubMed)

Woods SW. Chlorpromazine equivalent doses for the newer atypical antipsychotics. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;64(6):663-7. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n0607.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12823080 (View on PubMed)

McEvoy JP, Hogarty GE, Steingard S. Optimal dose of neuroleptic in acute schizophrenia. A controlled study of the neuroleptic threshold and higher haloperidol dose. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991 Aug;48(8):739-45. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810320063009.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 1883257 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KSPH-2007-17

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.