Prospective Trial on Noise Reduction in Surgical Operating Theaters

NCT ID: NCT01612754

Last Updated: 2012-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim of Study: Adverse effects from noise pollution in operation theatres have been throughly demonstrated. We assessed the impact of a noise reduction program in paediatric surgery.

Methods: A prospective controlled study on 156 operations performed by 16 surgeons was conducted. The sound levels before and after a noise reduction program based on education, rules and technical devices (Sound Ear tm) were assessed. Endpoints were spatially resolved sound levels matched by the surgeon's biometric (saliva cortisol, electrodermal activity) and behavioural stress responses (questionnaires). These were correlated with mission protocols and NoiSeQ for individual noise sensitivity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

We recorded median noise levels in the control vs. interventional group including the count of peak events with different tresholds.

Three phases were conducted: 1. Reference group/phase I 2. Control group/phase II The full data set was recorded by a research clerk present in theatre however all staff were left unaware of the study purpose 3. Intervention group/phase III. The intervention consisted of a panel of work rules including mainly communication regulations (only conversations concerning the current case were allowed, no in and out during surgery, mobile phone ban etc.. Measures were backed by intervention conferences, posters and pictograms. .

A wear off-effect was sought after . Biometrically, we analyzed the surgeon's pre- to postoperative rise in cortisol and the proportion of the surgeon's electrodermal potentials of \>15µS indicating severe stress. Intra-team communication, a decrease in disturbing conversations and sudden noise peaks were investigated and correlated with the individual noise sensitivity determined by the noise Q questionnaire.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Efficacy of a Noise Reduction Program Surgical Complications Sound Pressures in the Operating Theatre

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Reference group - cloaked noise meters

Reference group or phase 1

Theatre equipped with multiple sound meters disguised as CO2 meter for sound probing in the absence of a research clerk with personnel completely unaware of sound measurements.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Control Noise AND Stress measurements

Control Group - Phase 2

No intervention but research clerk is present in theatre to protocoll the operation and test for stress by collecting saliva cortisol and probing electrodermal activity

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Presence of an examiner in the concerned theatre

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Research Clerk present in theatre, writes on note pad.

Noise Reduction Intervention Group

Intervention Group - Phase 3

A panel of noise reduction measures (staff workplace rules, technical devices as optical noise warners, optical telephones) is put into effect. Surgeons are monitored by biometry, psychometry and the outcome.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Noise reduction work place rules

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Information conferences for all theatre staff (100%)on the detrimal effects of high noise levels in the operating theatre. Issue of "workplace rules" on handouts and poster on theatre doors: Ban of all mobile phones from theatre. Only conversations about the ongoing case are allowed. No restocking etc. during an operation and no work in this operating room concerning other patients (e.g. later on the list). Turnig of of unnecessary suckers, warming devices etc. . No in and out during the procedure.

Technical: Sound Ears (TM, Sound Ear A.S. Copenhagen, Denmark) taped to all 4 Walls. Optical Telephones.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Noise reduction work place rules

Information conferences for all theatre staff (100%)on the detrimal effects of high noise levels in the operating theatre. Issue of "workplace rules" on handouts and poster on theatre doors: Ban of all mobile phones from theatre. Only conversations about the ongoing case are allowed. No restocking etc. during an operation and no work in this operating room concerning other patients (e.g. later on the list). Turnig of of unnecessary suckers, warming devices etc. . No in and out during the procedure.

Technical: Sound Ears (TM, Sound Ear A.S. Copenhagen, Denmark) taped to all 4 Walls. Optical Telephones.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Presence of an examiner in the concerned theatre

Research Clerk present in theatre, writes on note pad.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Sound Ears (TM, Sound Ear A.S. Copenhagen, Denmark)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all operations of our tertiary referral center practice of the regular day programme involving children from preterm babies up to children of 16 years of age including emergencies at regular hours with a duration of \> 20 mins and \< 5 hours

Exclusion Criteria

* After hour emergency surgery
* Pediatric surgery cardiac cases
* surgeries \<20 mins/\>5hrs
Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Zurich

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Technische Universität Dresden

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hannover Medical School

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Carsten Engelmann

Oberarzt Kinderchirurgie

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carsten R Engelmann, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hannover Medical School, Germany

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pediatric Surgery Department

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Conrad C, Konuk Y, Werner PD, Cao CG, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW, Stangenberg L, Ott HC, Jones DB, Miller DL, Gee DW. A quality improvement study on avoidable stressors and countermeasures affecting surgical motor performance and learning. Ann Surg. 2012 Jun;255(6):1190-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318250b332.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22584632 (View on PubMed)

Engelmann C, Schneider M, Kirschbaum C, Grote G, Dingemann J, Schoof S, Ure BM. Effects of intraoperative breaks on mental and somatic operator fatigue: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1245-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1350-1. Epub 2010 Sep 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20835716 (View on PubMed)

Shapiro RA, Berland T. Noise in the operating room. N Engl J Med. 1972 Dec 14;287(24):1236-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197212142872407. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 5084988 (View on PubMed)

Moorthy K, Munz Y, Undre S, Darzi A. Objective evaluation of the effect of noise on the performance of a complex laparoscopic task. Surgery. 2004 Jul;136(1):25-30; discussion 31. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2003.12.011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15232535 (View on PubMed)

Connor A, Ortiz E. Staff solutions for noise reduction in the workplace. Perm J. 2009 Fall;13(4):23-7. doi: 10.7812/TPP/09-057.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20740099 (View on PubMed)

Arora S, Hull L, Sevdalis N, Tierney T, Nestel D, Woloshynowych M, Darzi A, Kneebone R. Factors compromising safety in surgery: stressful events in the operating room. Am J Surg. 2010 Jan;199(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.036.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20103067 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SA 02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Preventing Noise Exposure in Farmworkers
NCT07271290 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1
Hearing Changes After Surgery
NCT04322747 WITHDRAWN