Clinical Trial to Compare Two Surgical Approaches to the Cochlea

NCT ID: NCT06453343

Last Updated: 2025-02-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-01

Study Completion Date

2027-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective multicenter multinational randomized control trial. The duration of the study for the individual patient will be approximately 1 year (pre-operative assessments, 1 week, 3 months and 12 months follow-up assessments). Participants will be randomized to one of two surgical approaches: eRW or CO, with a 1:1 allocation in a parallel design.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: Preserving residual hearing in cochlear implant (CI) surgery has gained significant attention. It not only signifies minimally invasive implantation but also supports natural sound perception and enables electrical-acoustic stimulation, enhancing sound localization, music appreciation, and speech recognition in noisy environments. Using the Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI with Slim Modiolar electrode (Cochlear Ltd., Sydney, Australia), potential sites of residual hearing loss in surgery include approaches to the cochlear lumen, potential damage during entry, and damage during electrode insertion. Studies comparing different surgical approaches (cochleostomy (CO) and extended round window (eRW)) show varied results. Electrocochleography (ECochG) can be used to indicate intracochlear damage during electrode insertion, however, the variability observed in ECochG responses during cochlear implantation remains significant. Moreover, ECochG has not yet been used to monitor cochlear functions throughout every phase of surgery, including the insertion of the sheath or stabilization of the electrode lead.

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate whether the type of surgical approach to the cochlea; CO or eRW using the CI632 affects the final residual hearing and secondarily, intracochlear trauma and electrode position, as determined by pure tone audiometry, EcochG and imaging.

Study population: Adult CI candidates with post-lingual onset of severe to profound hearing loss, who are scheduled to receive a Nucleus CI632 with a slim modiolar electrode array and have a preoperative audiometric low-frequency average air conduction threshold of \<80 decibel (dB) hearing level at 500 Hz in the ear to be implanted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cochlear Implants Hearing Loss, Sensorineural

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cochleostomy

When employing the cochleostomy approach, a carefully positioned opening will be drilled anterior-inferior to the eRW membrane.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Surgical approach: cochleostomy or extended round window

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical placement of a cochlear implant electrode array

extended Round Window

In case of the extended round window approach, the scala tympani will be accessed through the extended round window technique, involving the creation of a round window margin cochleostomy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Surgical approach: cochleostomy or extended round window

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical placement of a cochlear implant electrode array

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Surgical approach: cochleostomy or extended round window

Surgical placement of a cochlear implant electrode array

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Individuals aged 18 years and older who have clinically established post-linguistic sensorineural hearing loss.
* CI candidate based on local or national reimbursement criteria.
* Cochlear implantation with a CI632.
* Preoperative 500 Hz pure-tone air conduction threshold \<80 dB hearing level (HL) in the ear to be implanted.
* Willing and able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous or existing CI recipient.
* Ossification or other anatomical abnormalities of the cochlea or its windows possibly affecting normal electrode array insertion.
* Abnormal cochlear nerve anatomy on preoperative CT or MRI.
* Subjects who are unable to undergo CT or MRI.
* Deafness due to acoustic nerve or central auditory pathway lesions.
* Diagnosis of auditory neuropathy.
* Active middle ear infection.
* Additional handicaps that would prevent participation in study evaluations.
* Unrealistic expectations from the participant regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations inherent to the CI procedure and the investigation.
* Cochlear employees or employees of Contract Research Organisations or contractors engaged by Cochlear for the purposes of this investigation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Radboud University Medical Center

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Coby Lindeboom, MD

Role: CONTACT

024 361 14934

Emmanuel Mylanus

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Lindeboom

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL85808.091.23

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.