Testing the Feasibility of Patient Controlled Sedation for Ventilated ICU Patients
NCT ID: NCT01606852
Last Updated: 2018-03-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-03-31
2015-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators hypothesize that patient-controlled sedation, compared to clinician-directed sedation, will decrease sedative exposure while decreasing patient anxiety during the episode of mechanical ventilation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Self-management of Sedative Therapy by Ventilated Patients
NCT02819141
A Safety and Efficacy Study of Dexmedetomidine in ICU Patients Requiring Continuous Sedation
NCT00216190
Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam for Continuous Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
NCT00481312
Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Continuous Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
NCT00479661
Impacts of Low-Dose Dexmedetomidine on Sleep Quality in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients
NCT03335527
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Establish the feasibility of subject recruitment and protocol adherence in a randomized pilot trial that compares patient-controlled sedation (PCS) using dexmedetomidine to usual sedation practice in mechanically ventilated patients. Feasibility will be defined by: a) number and proportion of patients or proxies who consent to enrollment, b) proportion of eligible subjects enrolled on Days 1,2,3,4 etc, of mechanical ventilation, c) number of days on protocol, up to five days, that subjects successfully use the PCS device, d) ability of ICU nurses to adjust the pump and adhere to the infusion rates of the PCS protocol.
2. Develop and refine the study protocol including: a) improving the proportion of patient daily assessments actually completed such as anxiety and delirium scales, b) develop a protocol to reliably determine when the subject is not able to self-manage their sedation due to weakness, confusion or severe illness; c) create rules for suspending PCS therapy and d) develop a post-ICU symptom interview.
3. Estimate effect sizes on key variables to inform the design of a future randomized trial to compare: a) sedative exposure, anxiety levels, and delirium occurrence between groups, b) adverse event rates and protocol violations related to the drug, pump or both; and c) duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
usual sedative practice
Subjects will have "usual care" sedation directed by their patient care team with no protocolized restriction on drug doses, selection or duration.
No interventions assigned to this group
Patient controlled sedation
Subjects will be given the hand actuator connected to a Lifecare PCA Infusion System in the PCA + continuous mode with the syringe filled with 4 ucg/ml of dexmedetomidine. A loading dose (0.5 mcg/kg) will be given followed by a continuous basal infusion (0.2-0.7 mcg/kg/hr) with 3 allowable patient-controlled self-boluses per hour (0.25 mcg/kg) each with a 20-minute lock-out. Bedside RNs will adjust the basal rate to a maximum of based on the number of bolus requests in the prior two hours. Subjects can also receive bolus supplemental sedative medications (benzodiazepines and/or opioids)if needed in the judgment of the patient-care nurse.
Dexmedetomidine
loading dose (0.5 mcg/kg i.v.), followed by a continuous basal infusion (0.2-0.7 mcg/kg/hr) with 3 allowable patient-controlled self-boluses per hour (0.25 mcg/kg) each with a 20-minute lock-out. Study infusion up to 5 days.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexmedetomidine
loading dose (0.5 mcg/kg i.v.), followed by a continuous basal infusion (0.2-0.7 mcg/kg/hr) with 3 allowable patient-controlled self-boluses per hour (0.25 mcg/kg) each with a 20-minute lock-out. Study infusion up to 5 days.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* subjects have to have at least a 50% chance of being able to operate the PCS machine (i.e., adequate hand strength and cognition)
Exclusion Criteria
* hypotension requiring vasopressors (systolic blood pressure \< 85 mmHg), second or third degree heart block or bradycardia (heart rate \< 50 beats/min.)
* permanent condition preventing the use of push button device (e.g., paralysis)
* pregnancy or lactation
* acute hepatitis or liver failure
* general anesthesia 24 hours prior
* acute stroke or uncontrolled seizures
* acute MI
* severe cognition or communication problems (e.g., coma as main reason for intubation, deafness without signing literacy, dementia or severe delirium)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
NIH
Hospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
INDUSTRY
University of Minnesota
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Craig Weinert, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Minnesota
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Minnesota Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IND 111693
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.