Duration of Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Facial Fractures

NCT ID: NCT01583062

Last Updated: 2013-07-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

217 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-31

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Facial fractures make up a significant proportion of injuries in trauma patients. Treatment of these fractures often results in standard surgical interventions. While up to the early 1980's perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in maxillofacial surgery was controversial, its efficacy is well accepted today. Chole and his team could show that the administration of antibiotics one hour preoperatively and eight hours after the intervention reduces the incidence of infectious complications in facial fractures from 42,2% to 8.9%. However there is still no consensus about the duration of the postoperative administration. In literature postoperative prophylaxis in facial fractures varies from single-shot 6-7 up to a duration of 7 and even ten days postoperatively 8-10. The use of antibiotics can be associated with allergic or toxic reactions, adverse effects, drug interactions and increasing bacterial resistance. In addition some authors assume that a prolonged administration of antibiotics might increase the risk of infectious complications via superinfection. On the other hand a short term or single shot administration might not be enough to prevent the onset of an postoperative infection. Up to date there is no standard to support the administration of antibiotics after surgical repair of a facial fracture.

The purpose of this prospective, randomized double-blinded trial is to investigate the utility of antibiotics administered in the postoperative period after surgical revision of facial fractures.

Hypothesis: a short-term antibiotic prophylaxis of 1 day postoperatively is equally effective as a long-term administration of 5 days in facial fractures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background

While up to the early 1980's perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in maxillofacial surgery was controversial its efficacy is well accepted today. Chole et al. showed that the administration of antibiotics reduces the incidence of infectious complications in facial fractures from 42,2% to 8.9%.

However there is still no consensus about the duration of the postoperative administration. In literature postoperative prophylaxis varies from single-shot up to 7 and even ten days postoperatively.

Antibiotic use is costly and associated with allergic reactions, toxic reactions, adverse effects, drug interactions and increasing bacterial resistance. Additionally some authors assume that a prolonged administration of antibiotics might even increase the risk of infectious complications via superinfection. On the other hand one might risk an increase of postoperative infections with a short term or single shot administration.

In a medline search only few studies could be found which deal with antimicrobial prophylaxis in maxillofacial surgery and in facial trauma surgery in particular.

Articles which advocate a single shot administration contain a very inhomogeneous group of patients. Merten et al. compared a single shot with a 48h regimen. The study included cleft patients, tumor resections, dental surgery, sinus revisions, plastic surgery and trauma. He concluded that a one shot administration of 1500mg cefuroxime is equally effective as a 48h regimen.

The second study which investigated the efficacy of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis included preprosthetic, plastic, orthognathic, tumor and trauma surgery. Here also single shot administration was found to be sufficient in preventing postoperative infection. Studies about antibiotic single shot administration which included trauma patients only do not exist.

Some studies compared a 12 or 24 hour with a 5 day postoperative regime: Johnson et al. conducted a study with one hundred nine patients requiring pedicled flap reconstruction in the region of the head and neck. He investigated if 5 days of antibiotic administration would be more effective than 1 day and concluded that no beneficial effect from administration of antibiotics for longer than 24 hours postoperatively can be achieved in patients who undergo myocutaneous flap reconstruction.

Bentley et al. studied the effect on infection rates of 1-day and 5-day administration of prophylactic antibiotics in orthognathic surgical procedures. He concluded that antibiotic prophylaxis for orthognathic surgical procedures should continue beyond the immediate postoperative period for 5 days since the infection rate was significantly higher in the one day regimen (60% vs. 6.7%). It must be stated that in this study very strict criteria for wound infection (such as spontaneous wound dehiscence in the absence of pus drainage) were applied.

Abubaker et al. evaluated the difference between the effect of a 5-day postoperative course and a 12 hour administration of antibiotics in 30 Patients on the incidence of postoperative infection in uncomplicated fractures of the mandible. He concluded that a prolonged administration of antibiotics has no benefit in reducing the incidence of infections.

In other surgical fields guidelines concerning the perioperative antibiotic use have been established. The East practice management guidelines for example recommend to limit the postoperative administration in open fractures to 48 hours after wound closure. Unfortunately these guidelines can not be uncritically applied to maxillofacial trauma patients out of several reasons. Not only the fracture patterns are basically different from those in orthopedics but also the surgical treatment differs in many aspects: the impossibility of complete wound disinfection, the continuing contamination by saliva even after primary closure, the lack of casts or sterile wound dressings, the impossibility of extensive wound debridement or open wound treatment.

Pharmaceutical study substance:

Co-amoxiclav is an antibacterial combination consisting of the semisynthetic antibiotic amoxicillin and the ß-lactamase inhibitor, clavulanate potassium. It was introduced as "Augmentin®" in 1984 by Glaxosmithkline and Smithkline Beecham (collectively "GSK"). Since the patent expired in december 2002 several generic versions were approved.

It is used in the treatment of lower respiratory, middle ear, sinus, skin and urinary tract infections. In ENT and maxillofacial surgery it is used for prophylaxis and therapy for several indications. In the investigators' department the present prophylaxis regimen for facial fractures varies from 5 to 8 days postoperatively.

Objective

Aim of this study is to evaluate the difference between the effect of a five- vs. a one-day postoperative course of antibiotics on the incidence of postoperative infections in facial fractures.

Methods

Patients with a facial fractures, which need surgical revision, are randomly assigned into two groups. Both groups receive amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1.2 g intravenously every eight hours from admission up to 24 hours postoperatively. Group A then receives amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 625 mg orally every eight hours for four days. Group B receives oral placebo using the same schedule for the same duration as group A. Follow up appointments are 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12 weeks and 6 months after surgery. The developement of a surgical site infection (according to CDC) is defined as primary end point.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Surgical Wound Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Both groups receive amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1.2 g intravenously every eight hours from admission up to 24 hours postoperatively. Group 1 then receives amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 625 mg orally every eight hours for four days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

Both groups receive amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1.2 g intravenously every eight hours from admission up to 24 hours postoperatively. Group 1 then receives amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 625 mg orally every eight hours for four days.

2

Both groups receive amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1.2 g intravenously every eight hours from admission up to 24 hours postoperatively. Group 2 receives oral placebo using the same schedule for the same duration as group 1.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Amoxicillin plus placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Both groups receive amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1.2 g intravenously every eight hours from admission up to 24 hours postoperatively. Group 2 receives oral placebo using the same schedule for the same duration as group 1.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid

Both groups receive amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1.2 g intravenously every eight hours from admission up to 24 hours postoperatively. Group 1 then receives amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 625 mg orally every eight hours for four days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Amoxicillin plus placebo

Both groups receive amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1.2 g intravenously every eight hours from admission up to 24 hours postoperatively. Group 2 receives oral placebo using the same schedule for the same duration as group 1.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Isolated orbital fracture, zygomatic fracture, mandibular fracture, or LeFort I/II/III fracture which requires surgical treatment
* Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria

* Need of intensive care treatment
* Presence of an acute bacterial infection
* Gunshot wounds
* Pathological fracture
* Skull base fracture with rhinoliquorrhea or intracranial emphysema
* History of malignancy or radiation to the head and neck area
* Known hypersensitivity, allergy to penicillin or other beta-lactam antibiotics
* Reduced body weight (\<40kg or BMI\<17), severe renal insufficiency (stage 4 according to the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI))
* Insufficient patient compliance
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Schweizerische Unfallversicherung SUVA, Switzerland

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mepha Parma AG, Switzerland

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

GlaxoSmithKline AG, Switzerland

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Olivier Lieger, MD, DMD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Tateyuki Iizuka, MD, DDS, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dep. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bern University Hospital

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Peterson LJ, Booth DF. Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in intraoral orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg. 1976 Dec;34(12):1088-91.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1069110 (View on PubMed)

Martis C, Karabouta I. Infection after orthognathic surgery, with and without preventive antibiotics. Int J Oral Surg. 1984 Dec;13(6):490-4. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(84)80019-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6439657 (View on PubMed)

Yrastorza JA. Indications for antibiotics in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg. 1976 Jun;34(6):514-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1063838 (View on PubMed)

Chole RA, Yee J. Antibiotic prophylaxis for facial fractures. A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987 Oct;113(10):1055-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1987.01860100033016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3304348 (View on PubMed)

Hotz G, Novotny-Lenhard J, Kinzig M, Soergel F. Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in maxillofacial surgery. Chemotherapy. 1994 Jan-Feb;40(1):65-9. doi: 10.1159/000239173.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8306818 (View on PubMed)

Merten HA, Halling F. [Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in maxillofacial surgery]. Infection. 1993;21 Suppl 1:S45-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01710343. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8314293 (View on PubMed)

Abubaker AO, Rollert MK. Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in mandibular fractures: A preliminary randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Dec;59(12):1415-9. doi: 10.1053/joms.2001.28272.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11732026 (View on PubMed)

Folkestad L, Granstrom G. A prospective study of orbital fracture sequelae after change of surgical routines. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Sep;61(9):1038-44. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00316-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12966479 (View on PubMed)

Gerlach KL, Pape HD. [Studies on preventive antibiotics in the surgical treatment of mandibular fractures]. Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1988 Nov-Dec;12(6):497-500. No abstract available. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3253045 (View on PubMed)

National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Feb;39(2 Suppl 1):S1-266. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11904577 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.cdc.gov/

Click here for more information about the definition of Surgical Site Infections

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1601

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

235/04

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis
NCT01857804 COMPLETED PHASE4
Antibiotic Prophylaxis - Amoxicillin
NCT01829529 COMPLETED PHASE3