Local Infiltration Versus Block Against Pains After High Tibial Osteotomy
NCT ID: NCT01537146
Last Updated: 2016-01-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-04-30
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Analgesic Effect of Combined Nerve Block and Systemic High Dose Glucocorticoid After Total Knee Arthroplasty.
NCT02374008
Ultrasound-guided Selective Blockade of the Saphenous and Obturator Nerves Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02465827
Protracted Effect of Combined Nerve Blocks After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02067078
Local Anesthetic Automated Intermittent Administration vs. Continuous Infusion Via Femoral Nerve Block.
NCT03696095
Minimum Local Anesthetic Dose for Adductor Canal Block
NCT03427385
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Proximal open-wedge tibia osteotomy is an accepted treatment option for younger patients with unilateral osteoarthritis of knee. 70 such operations are performed in the investigators Orthopaedic Divisions each year. The surgery involves cutting through the upper end of the tibia and opens the bone using specialized instruments. The tibia is lengthened on the medial side with the purpose of correcting the mechanical axis of the knee joint. The surgery is associated with many pains in the early postoperative phase. Until now, pain treatment has been controlled with either epidural block, or regional block via femoral catheter. Both treatments may involve risks such as loss of strength and sensibility disturbance, which often prolongs the early recovery and mobilization. Moreover, pain treatment administered via femoral catheter is often not sufficient as a part of the area behind the knee joint is not covered.
With the advent of new pain therapies, particularly intra operative administration of local anaesthetics directly in the operating field and catheter administration for postoperative pain management, there is hope that those disadvantages are eliminated. By ensuring an effective pain treatment and the possibility of early mobilization only hours after completion of surgery, this will allow for better patient care in terms of reduced pain, shorter hospitalization and quicker rehabilitation.
New results show that the healing of bone opening is not compromised by rapid mobilization. The migration of bone parts around the opening is measured by roentgen stereometric analysis (RSA), with a precision of approximately 0.2 mm. This verifies stable healing of the bone opening.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Femoral Block
Ropivacaine
Bolus infusion via catheter/6H for 24H
Local Infiltration Anagesia
Ropivacaine
Intra operational bolus infusion. Bolus infusion via catheter /6H for 24H
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ropivacaine
Bolus infusion via catheter/6H for 24H
Ropivacaine
Intra operational bolus infusion. Bolus infusion via catheter /6H for 24H
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients (male/female) ≥ 18 år
* Patients giving written informed consent and authority.
* Patients receiving epidural anaesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
* Rejection of or contraindicated epidural anaesthesia
* Patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
* Patients with Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 35
* Patients that do not read or write Danish
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anders C Laursen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark
Mogens B Laursen, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Clinik Farsoe, Aalborg University Hospital
Farsø, Northern Jutland, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ON-04-019-ACL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.