Different Feeding Methods After Pyloromyotomy

NCT ID: NCT01509417

Last Updated: 2013-05-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-07-31

Study Completion Date

2012-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to scientifically evaluate the ability to discharge patients based on feeding schedule comparing ad lib feeds to our current scheduled regimen.

The hypothesis is that patients may be able to be discharged sooner with ad lib feeds.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is a common disease occurring in 2 per 1,000 live births1. Pyloric stenosis is a hypertrophy of the pyloric muscle which prevents emptying of the stomach leading to gastric outlet obstruction. The vomiting that ensues becomes projectile and results in severe dehydration. Traditionally this has been repaired with the pyloromyotomy via a transverse incision in the right upper quadrant. In the last decade the investigators have started doing the same procedure laparoscopically. Most institutions follow similar guidelines as to what constitutes a hypertrophic pyloric channel, initial electrolyte management and resuscitation prior to surgery, as well as the pyloromyotomy (either open or laparoscopically).

Historically patients were fed the day after surgery, then 6 hours, and currently the investigators wait 2 hours after surgery to start feeds. The investigators go through a protocol of 2 rounds of clear liquids, 2 rounds of half strength formula/breast milk then 2 rounds of full strength. Some centers have advocated ad lib feeds where babies go straight to full strength as tolerated when awake from the operation.

Institutional variability is even further confounded by individual attending variability in some instances. Recent articles in the past two decades still prove that no consensus has been found. Some institutions profess that Ad Libitum feeding is both cost-effective as well as safe, but very few institutions to our knowledge follow this mantra. Others demand that no feeds should be started within 4 hours post surgery stating that the increased vomiting associated with this early feeding regimen actually prolongs the time to full feeds due to anxiety and discomfort. What has been shown is that no matter whether patients start 4 hours post surgery or wait 18 hours the time to full feeds is the same. All of these studies are hindered by the fact that they all have retrospective components to their design.

What has also been propagated in two recent retrospective reviews is the implementation of clinical pathways as well as standardized feeding regimens. Both of these showed a decrease in length of stay postoperatively as well as hospital costs.

At our institution a clinical pathway and feeding regimen has been implemented. The feeding regimen contrary to some of the previously quoted papers starts at 2 hours with sequential feeding increases. A prospectively acquired dataset at our institution has shown that emesis is correlated to the degree of dehydration of the child prior to surgery even with all the children being on the same clinical pathway.

What all of these studies show us is that as a profession, Pediatric Surgery does not have the proper evidence to support any one post-op feeding regimen.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Emesis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ad lib feeding

ad lib feedings following pyloromyotomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ad lib feedings after pyloromyotomy

Intervention Type OTHER

ad lib feedings after pyloromyotomy

FLAP diet after pyloromyotomy

Intervention Type OTHER

FLAP diet after pyloromyotomy

FLAP diet after pyloromyotomy

FLAP diet after pyloromyotomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

FLAP diet after pyloromyotomy

Intervention Type OTHER

FLAP diet after pyloromyotomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ad lib feedings after pyloromyotomy

ad lib feedings after pyloromyotomy

Intervention Type OTHER

FLAP diet after pyloromyotomy

FLAP diet after pyloromyotomy

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

post surgical refeeding ad lib Post surgical FLAP refeeding

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who are diagnosed with pyloric stenosis and scheduled for laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. -

Exclusion Criteria

* Open procedures
* Patient has alternative diagnosis that would affect feeding (like mucosal perforation)
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Day

Maximum Eligible Age

3 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shawn D St. Peter, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's Mercy Hospital

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10 05-101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.