Bedside Silo Versus Operative Closure for Gastroschisis

NCT ID: NCT00404690

Last Updated: 2016-01-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-10-31

Study Completion Date

2008-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The hypothesis is that there is no difference between bedside silo placement and operative closure in return of bowel function, ventilator dependence, or length of stay.

The primary outcome variable between the two techniques will be determined from this study that can then be used to develop a definitive study. The likely variables will be length of time to meet discharge criteria, length of hospitalization, time to full feedings, time on mechanical ventilation and total hospital charges.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A strategy of blocked randomization will be utilized. The randomization will be blocked in groups of 4. Randomization sequence will be kept by the principal investigator. After permission is obtained, the next assignment will be obtained. This method assures that the physician obtaining permission will be blind to the treatment group.

The treatment groups will consist of the same medical management, feeding regimen and discharge criteria.

The interventions will be either bedside silo or operative attempt at closure. During attempt at primary closure, the abdomen will be closed completely if the staff anesthesiologist and surgeon agree the belly is not too tight based on ventilatory parameters, vital signs and appearance. If either the surgeon or anesthesiologist should feel the closed abdomen is too tight, a ringed silo will be placed in the operating room, the same silo used in the bedside treatment arm, and the child will continue in the study. When a silo is placed either in the operating room due to inability to close the abdomen or at the bedside, they will be managed the same way. The skin will be dressed in the standard fashion (betadine jelly, xeroform and kerlix). The dressing allows visualization of the bowel. No reductions will be done the day of placement. After one night of observation a tie will be gently placed to apply downward pressure on the bowel. This pressure will not be allowed to increase the peak ventilator pressure by more than 2 cm H2O. One tie will be placed each subsequent day until the tie is within 2 cm of the skin at which point the patient will be scheduled for operative closure the day following the placement of the tie.

The medical management is controlled for resuscitation, sedation, ventilation and feeding between groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastroschisis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Operative attempt at closure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Operative attempt at closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

go the operating room to attempt closure

2

bedside silo

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bedside Silo

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

silo placed at bedside on admission

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bedside Silo

silo placed at bedside on admission

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Operative attempt at closure

go the operating room to attempt closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with gastroschisis

Exclusion Criteria

* Born prior to 34 weeks estimated gestational age
* Another congenital anomaly influencing the respiratory status, gastrointestinal status, or the length of hospitalization and recovery.
Maximum Eligible Age

1 Day

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shawn St. Peter

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shawn D St. Peter, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Children's Mercy Hospital

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

06 09 141

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sham Feeding Post-operative Infants
NCT03350022 COMPLETED NA