Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
88 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-11-30
2010-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study plan is to retrospectively compare two groups of patients: those who underwent esophagectomy with pyloric drainage procedure and those who did not. The study will be done using all MD Anderson patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomies, in which pyloroplasty and pyloromyotomy are not standard procedures. Clinically relevant data and demographic information will be collected retrospectively for the two groups including age, gender, Body Mass Index, level of anastomosis, and time elapsed since surgery. All patients will be interviewed via telephone. At least two attempts will be made to contact each patient.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pyloric Drainage Procedure
Esophagectomy with pyloric drainage procedure
Telephone Questionnaire
Ten questions regarding symptoms of reflux
No Pyloric Drainage Procedure
Esophagectomy without pyloric drainage procedure
Telephone Questionnaire
Ten questions regarding symptoms of reflux
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Telephone Questionnaire
Ten questions regarding symptoms of reflux
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients who received esophagectomy indicated for primary esophageal cancer, either adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma
3. Patients who received minimally invasive or transthoracic or transhiatal or three-field esophagectomy at MDACC during or after 2004
4. Patients who are English-speaking and of any ethnicity
5. Patients with prior cancers, any clinical stage of esophageal carcinoma, any performance status (as rated by American Society of Anesthesiologist Risk Scale), received or did not receive preoperative treatment, had level of anastomosis in either neck or chest
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Reza J. Mehran, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2008-0465
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id