Nut Allergy Study: Double-blind Challenge and Oral Desensitization

NCT ID: NCT01502878

Last Updated: 2016-09-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-05-31

Study Completion Date

2016-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Nut sensitization in skin prick tests is common in areas, including Finland, where birch pollen is abundant. However, sensitization to nuts in skin prick test does not predict the possibility of allergic symptoms when nuts are ingested. In this study the investigators launch and perform double-blind placebo-controlled nut challenges and oral desensitization/ protocol to those with serious symptoms in the challenge. The efficacy and safety of the new oral desensitization program is the primary outcome. The effect of oral desensitization on bronchial hyperreactivity, eosinophilic airway inflammation, and quality of life are secondary outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators aim to improve nut allergy diagnosis by launching a new double-blind placebo-controlled nut (peanut, hazel nut, cashew) challenge protocol. The investigators also launch a specific oral tolerance induction (SOTI) protocol to nuts in serious nut allergy. This study takes place in the Helsinki University Skin and Allergy Hospital between May 2011 and December 2015. Inclusion criteria: age 6 to 18 years and suspected nut allergy (unclear anaphylaxis possibly caused by nuts, skin prick test to nuts ≥ 10 mm or specific-IgE ≥ 20 kU/L and have never eaten nuts, or avoids nuts and does not dare try nuts at home). Patients having uncontrolled asthma or other lung disease, having cardiovascular disease or other systemic disease, using beta-blockers, and having poor compliance, are excluded. Methods:The investigators perform skin prick tests to peanut, tree nuts and seeds, take a blood sample before the double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC), and measure total IgE and specific-IgE to birch, peanut, hazel nut, allergen components Ara h 1, 2, 3, and 8, and Cor a 1 and 8. Then the serum samples are kept frozen for further component and immunologic analyses. The investigators put iv before the challenge. In DBPCFC the patients receive 5 mg, 50 mg, 200mg, and 1000mg nut protein mixt with placebo, or placebo every 30 minutes. The severity of the allergic reaction is estimated using a modified severity scale. The probability of severe/moderate reaction at low (\<0.7 kU/L) and at increased (\>0.7 kU/L) Ara h 2 and 8 concentrations is the primary end-point in the DBPCFC. The investigators also correlate the concentrations of Ara h 2 with the severity score. Patients with moderate or severe reaction in the challenge will be offered desensitization therapy "SOTI" using(pea)nut flour mixed with milk-free margarine. The first dose of 0.1 mg nut protein is given at hospital part of the up-dosing is made at home every 2 weeks. The patient takes an antihistamine 1 hour before each daily dose. An epinephrine autoinjector and prednisolone tablets are also prescribed for emergency use. The desensitization protocol takes 28 weeks and is personalized when needed. Exercise is avoided 1 hour following each dose. Before and after the SOTI the investigators measure food related quality of life using standardized questionnaires, and perform metacholine challenge and measure exhaled nitric oxid. After the SOTI the investigators take blood samples and perform DBPCFC again.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nut Allergy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nut challenge

Double-blind placebo controlled oral challenge 5-50-200-1000 mg peanut or hazelnut protein, or placebo administered with 30 min intervals and 2 hour-follow-up after the last dose.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Nut challenge

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Nut powder made from non-roasted nuts and roasted banana mixed with oats yoghurt or chocolate pudding

Nut challenge: Placebo

See intervention

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Nut challenge: Placebo

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Dried banana mixed with oat yoghurt or chocolate pudding

Nut oral desensitization

Patients who have moderate to severe immediate allergic reaction at peanut challenge and who enter the oral desensitization program receive peanut protein daily, from 0,1 mg to 800 mg peanut protein, maintenance dose 800 mg.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nut oral desensitization

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Roasted peanut powder mixed with milk- and soy-free margarine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nut challenge

Nut powder made from non-roasted nuts and roasted banana mixed with oats yoghurt or chocolate pudding

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Nut challenge: Placebo

Dried banana mixed with oat yoghurt or chocolate pudding

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Nut oral desensitization

Roasted peanut powder mixed with milk- and soy-free margarine

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Super nuts banan chips Yosa oat yoghurt Arla cowpower chololate pudding Super nuts banan chips Yosa oat yoghurt Arla cowpower chololate pudding Old Virginia Byrd Mill Fat-Light roasted peanut Keiju-margarine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* sensitization in skin prick test or in serum nut-specific IgE
* unknown anaphylaxis suspected caused by nuts
* never eaten nuts
* if challenge positive with serious symptoms, OIT

Exclusion Criteria

* active asthma and low lung function,
* pregnancy, cardiovascular or other disease that might worsen during the challenge and OIT
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Helsinki University Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mika Juhani Mäkelä, MD, PhD

Chief Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mika J Mäkelä, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Helsinki UCH

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Helsinki University Central Hospital, Skin and Allergy Hospital

Helsinki, Finland, Finland

Site Status

Helsinki University Central Hospital, Skin and Allergy Hospital

Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Finland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Uotila R, Kukkonen AK, Greco D, Pelkonen AS, Makela MJ. Peanut oral immunotherapy decreases IgE to Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 but does not enhance sensitization to cross-reactive allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Apr;139(4):1393-1396.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.054. Epub 2016 Dec 1. No abstract available.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27916627 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IAS11

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

HUCHT101060080

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Walnut Oral Immunotherapy for Tree Nut Allergy
NCT01546753 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Walnut Oral Immunotherapy for Tree Nut Allergy
NCT01834352 WITHDRAWN PHASE1/PHASE2
Repeat Nasal Allergen Challenge
NCT00290368 COMPLETED PHASE2