Walnut Oral Immunotherapy for Tree Nut Allergy

NCT ID: NCT01834352

Last Updated: 2016-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-11-30

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if walnut oral immunotherapy can be used in subjects allergic to tree nuts to decrease their tree nut allergy and induce changes in their immune system.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Tree nut

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nut Hypersensitivities

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Walnut protein flour

Walnut protein flour that is ingested in gradually increasing amounts up to a maintenance dose.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Walnut Protein Flour

Intervention Type DRUG

Daily ingestion of gradually increasing amounts of walnut protein flour in order to induce desensitization to walnut and an unrelated tree nut.

Oat flour

Oat flour administered in identical increasing amounts as the active walnut protein flour.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Oat flour

Intervention Type DRUG

Oat flour that is administered as a placebo in identical increasing doses as the active walnut flour treatment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Walnut Protein Flour

Daily ingestion of gradually increasing amounts of walnut protein flour in order to induce desensitization to walnut and an unrelated tree nut.

Intervention Type DRUG

Oat flour

Oat flour that is administered as a placebo in identical increasing doses as the active walnut flour treatment.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Walnut OIT Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 6 to 45 years, either sex, any race, any ethnicity with a convincing clinical history of walnut or another tree nut allergy and either a positive prick skin test (\> 3mm) or serologic evidence of allergic sensitization (defined as specific IgE \> 0.35 kU/L) to walnut and at least one other tree nut.
* A positive 2000 mg oral food challenge at enrollment to walnut and to one other tree nut.
* Written informed consent from participant and/or parent/guardian
* Written assent from all subjects as appropriate
* All females of child bearing age must be using appropriate birth control

Exclusion Criteria

* History of severe anaphylaxis to walnut or other tree nuts, defined as symptoms associated with hypoxia, hypotension or neurologic compromise (cyanosis or SpO2 \< 92% at any stage, hypotension, confusion, collapse, loss of consciousness; or incontinence).
* Known allergy to oat
* Chronic disease (other than asthma, atopic dermatitis, rhinitis) requiring therapy or other respiratory or medical conditions deemed by the investigator to put the subject at increased risk of anaphylaxis or poor outcomes from receiving OIT or undergoing food challenge.
* Poor control or persistent activation of atopic dermatitis
* Active eosinophilic or other inflammatory (e.g., celiac) gastrointestinal disease in the past 2 years.
* Participation in any interventional study for food allergy in the past 6 months
* Participant is on "build-up phase" of immunotherapy (i.e., has not reached maintenance dosing).
* Severe asthma (2007 NHLBI Criteria Steps 5 or 6, see Appendix 2) or poorly controlled mild or moderate asthma
* Inability to discontinue antihistamines for initial day escalation, skin testing or OFC
* Use of omalizumab or other non-traditional forms of allergen immunotherapy (e.g., oral or sublingual) or immunomodulator therapy (not including corticosteroids) or biologic therapy within the past year
* Use of beta-blockers (oral), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) or calcium channel blockers
* Pregnancy or lactation
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Wesley Burks, MD

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wesley Burks, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UNC Chapel Hill

Edwin Kim, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

UNC Chapel Hill

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kulis M, Li Y, Lane H, Pons L, Burks W. Single-tree nut immunotherapy attenuates allergic reactions in mice with hypersensitivity to multiple tree nuts. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jan;127(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.09.014. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21093029 (View on PubMed)

Hofmann AM, Scurlock AM, Jones SM, Palmer KP, Lokhnygina Y, Steele PH, Kamilaris J, Burks AW. Safety of a peanut oral immunotherapy protocol in children with peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Aug;124(2):286-91, 291.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.03.045. Epub 2009 May 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19477496 (View on PubMed)

Jones SM, Pons L, Roberts JL, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kulis M, Shreffler WG, Steele P, Henry KA, Adair M, Francis JM, Durham S, Vickery BP, Zhong X, Burks AW. Clinical efficacy and immune regulation with peanut oral immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Aug;124(2):292-300, 300.e1-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.022. Epub 2009 Jul 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19577283 (View on PubMed)

Varshney P, Jones SM, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kemper A, Steele P, Hiegel A, Kamilaris J, Carlisle S, Yue X, Kulis M, Pons L, Vickery B, Burks AW. A randomized controlled study of peanut oral immunotherapy: clinical desensitization and modulation of the allergic response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;127(3):654-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1111.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21377034 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13-1289

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergic Patients
NCT04163562 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2