Induction of Sustained Unresponsiveness to Peanuts Using High- and Low-dose Peanut Oral Immunotherapy

NCT ID: NCT05163574

Last Updated: 2023-08-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-05

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a continuation of a clinical trial NCT044155930 comparing the efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy (OIT) with low or high doses of peanut protein (150 or 300 mg, respectively) and will involve patients who have accomplished their per-protocol participation in that trial.

The aim of current study is to assess a sustained unresponsiveness (SU) to allergen protein after at least 8 months of previously assigned high- or low-dose peanut OIT, followed by 4-week-allergen avoidance, and verified by an open oral food challenge (OOFC).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Oral immunotherapy is considered the most effective food allergy treatment. There are two main goals of food immunotherapy: achievement of desensitisation and sustained unresponsiveness. Desensitization is a temporary state of clinical non-reactivity which requires regular intake of allergen, whereas sustained unresponsiveness is defined as lack of clinical reaction to a food allergen after discontinuing OIT for a specific period of time.

The study is a continuation of a clinical trial NCT044155930, which was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy (OIT) with low or high doses of peanut protein (150 or 300 mg, respectively) in children with a confirmed diagnosis of peanut allergy. The participants of current study will be recruited from patients who have accomplished their per-protocol participation in previous trial.

Patients will receive the same maintenance dose of peanut allergen, which was used in previous trial (150 or 300 mg, respectively), for at least 8 months (32 weeks +/-2 weeks). Then, OIT will be discontinued for 4 weeks with strict peanut avoidance. After this period, an open oral food challenge (OOFC) will be performed to assess the achievement of sustained unresponsiveness.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peanut Allergy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High dose

20 patients

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High dose OIT

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Patients will receive daily a high dose of peanut flour (300 mg peanut protein) mixed with well-tolerated fruit mousse.

Low dose

20 patients

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Low dose OIT

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Patients will receive daily a low dose of peanut flour (150 mg peanut protein) mixed with well-tolerated fruit mousse.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High dose OIT

Patients will receive daily a high dose of peanut flour (300 mg peanut protein) mixed with well-tolerated fruit mousse.

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Low dose OIT

Patients will receive daily a low dose of peanut flour (150 mg peanut protein) mixed with well-tolerated fruit mousse.

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients who have accomplished their per-protocol participation in trial NCT044155930.
* signed Informed Consent by parent/legal guardian and patient aged\>16 years old
* patient's/caregiver's cooperation with researcher

Exclusion Criteria

* severe asthma
* uncontrolled mild/moderate asthma: forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1)\<80% (under 5 percentile), FEV1/forced vital capacity (FEV)\<75% (under 5 percentile), hospitalization due to asthma exacerbation within last 12 months
* current oral/sublingual/subcutaneous immunotherapy with another allergen
* eosinophilic esophagitis
* allergic reaction of 4th or higher grade according to the World Allergy Organisation Systemic Allergic Reaction Grading System during immunotherapy
* a history of severe recurrent anaphylaxis episodes
* chronic diseases requiring continous treatment, including heart disease, epilepsy, metabolic disease, diabetes
* medication:

* oral, daily steroid therapy exceeding 1 month within the last 12 months
* at least two courses of oral steroid therapy (at least 7 days) within the last 12 months
* oral steroid therapy longer than 7 days within the last 3 months
* biological treatment
* the need to constantly take antihistamines
* therapy with b-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, calcium channel inhibitors
* pregnancy
* no consent to participate in the study
* lack of patient cooperation
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Warsaw

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Katarzyna Grzela, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Medical University of Warsaw

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Pediatric Pneumonology and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Magdalena Chojnowska-Wójtowicz, MD

Role: CONTACT

22-317-9431

Katarzyna Grzela, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

22-317-9431

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Wioletta Zagórska, PhD, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Burks AW, Sampson HA, Plaut M, Lack G, Akdis CA. Treatment for food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Jan;141(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.11.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29307409 (View on PubMed)

Nagakura KI, Yanagida N, Sato S, Nishino M, Asaumi T, Ogura K, Ebisawa M. Low-dose oral immunotherapy for children with anaphylactic peanut allergy in Japan. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018 Aug;29(5):512-518. doi: 10.1111/pai.12898. Epub 2018 May 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29603410 (View on PubMed)

PALISADE Group of Clinical Investigators; Vickery BP, Vereda A, Casale TB, Beyer K, du Toit G, Hourihane JO, Jones SM, Shreffler WG, Marcantonio A, Zawadzki R, Sher L, Carr WW, Fineman S, Greos L, Rachid R, Ibanez MD, Tilles S, Assa'ad AH, Nilsson C, Rupp N, Welch MJ, Sussman G, Chinthrajah S, Blumchen K, Sher E, Spergel JM, Leickly FE, Zielen S, Wang J, Sanders GM, Wood RA, Cheema A, Bindslev-Jensen C, Leonard S, Kachru R, Johnston DT, Hampel FC Jr, Kim EH, Anagnostou A, Pongracic JA, Ben-Shoshan M, Sharma HP, Stillerman A, Windom HH, Yang WH, Muraro A, Zubeldia JM, Sharma V, Dorsey MJ, Chong HJ, Ohayon J, Bird JA, Carr TF, Siri D, Fernandez-Rivas M, Jeong DK, Fleischer DM, Lieberman JA, Dubois AEJ, Tsoumani M, Ciaccio CE, Portnoy JM, Mansfield LE, Fritz SB, Lanser BJ, Matz J, Oude Elberink HNG, Varshney P, Dilly SG, Adelman DC, Burks AW. AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):1991-2001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812856. Epub 2018 Nov 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30449234 (View on PubMed)

Patrawala M, Shih J, Lee G, Vickery B. Peanut Oral Immunotherapy: a Current Perspective. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2020 Apr 20;20(5):14. doi: 10.1007/s11882-020-00908-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32314071 (View on PubMed)

Rodriguez Del Rio P, Escudero C, Sanchez-Garcia S, Ibanez MD, Vickery BP. Evaluating primary end points in peanut immunotherapy clinical trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Feb;143(2):494-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.09.035. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30367908 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Sustained unresponsiveness

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Peanut and Tree Nut Desensitization
NCT03532360 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergic Patients
NCT04163562 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
Walnut Oral Immunotherapy for Tree Nut Allergy
NCT01834352 WITHDRAWN PHASE1/PHASE2
Walnut Oral Immunotherapy for Tree Nut Allergy
NCT01546753 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Food Allergen OIT for Shrimp and Cashew
NCT03504774 TERMINATED PHASE2