Cabazitaxel Compared to Topotecan for the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01500720
Last Updated: 2015-04-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
179 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-03-31
2014-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To demonstrate progression free survival (PFS) improvement for cabazitaxel compared to topotecan in participants with sensitive or resistant/refractory small cell lung cancer following a first line platinum based chemotherapy.
Secondary Objectives:
* To assess disease progression free rate at 12 weeks
* To assess Response Rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor \[RECIST\] 1.1) and duration of response
* To assess Overall Survival (OS)
* To assess the Safety (National Cancer Institute - Common Toxicity Criteria \[NCI-CTC\] version 4.03)
* To assess the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Phase II Study of Cabazitaxel-XRP6258 in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT01438307
Nab-paclitaxel Versus Topotecan As Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT04213937
Study of Atezolizumab in Combination With Cabozantinib Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With an Anti-PD-L1/PD-1 Antibody and Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy
NCT04471428
A Study of Tobemstomig Plus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy vs Pembrolizumab Plus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Participants With Previously Untreated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT05775289
SCLC on the 2nd Line With Relapsed After Response to Chemotherapy GFPC 01-2013
NCT02738346
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All participants are to be followed for disease progression documentation and for participant status until the study cut-off date.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cabazitaxel
Cabazitaxel
Cabazitaxel 25 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) intravenously (IV) on Day 1 every 3 weeks (21-day cycle) until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression or withdrawal consent.
Topotecan
Topotecan
Topotecan 1.5 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 to Day 5 every 3 weeks (21-Day cycle) until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression or withdrawal consent.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cabazitaxel
Cabazitaxel 25 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) intravenously (IV) on Day 1 every 3 weeks (21-day cycle) until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression or withdrawal consent.
Topotecan
Topotecan 1.5 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 to Day 5 every 3 weeks (21-Day cycle) until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression or withdrawal consent.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or female greater than or equal to (\>=) 18 years (or country's legal age of majority if greater than \[\>\]18 years)
* Participants with measurable disease, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (version 1.1)
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than or equal to (\<=) 1
Exclusion Criteria
* More than one prior chemotherapy regimen. Prior treatment with topotecan or taxanes
* Less than 28 days elapsed from prior treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery to the time of randomization (Radiotherapy for bone pain palliation is allowed)
* Adverse events (excluding alopecia) from any prior anticancer therapy of grade \>1 (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria \[NCI CTCAE\] v4.03) at the time of randomization
* Uncontrolled Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases: participants with CNS metastases may have previous irradiation, only participants with stable disease or response to irradiation who are without CNS symptoms and on a maximum steroid dose of dexamethasone 8 mg daily or equivalent could be included
* Participants with known leptomeningeal metastases
* History of other, invasive neoplasm requiring ongoing therapy
* Participation in another clinical trial and any concurrent treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days prior to randomization
* Any of the following within 6 months prior to study enrollment: myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina pectoris, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure, stroke or transient ischemic attack
* Any severe acute or chronic medical condition, which could impair the ability of the participant to participate in the study or interfere with interpretation of study results
* Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) disease, or active hepatitis B or C (systematic testing was not required)
* Pregnant or breast-feeding woman. Positive serum or urine pregnancy test prior to randomization
* Participant with reproductive potential (M/F) who did not agree to use an accepted and effective method of contraception during the study treatment period and for at least 6 months after the completion of the study treatment. The definition of "effective method of contraception" was based on the investigator's judgment. Effective method of contraception should also be adapted to local regulation
* History of hypersensitivity to polysorbate 80
* Inadequate organ and bone marrow function as evidenced by:
* Hemoglobin less than \[\<\] 9.0 gram per deciliter (g/dL)
* Absolute neutrophil count \<1.5 x 10\^9 per liter
* Platelet count \<100 x 10\^9 per liter
* Aspartate Aminotransferase/Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (AST/SGOT) and/or alanine aminotransferase/Serum Glutamic-Pyruvic Transaminase (ALT/SGPT) \>2.5 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
* Alkaline Phosphatase (AP) \>2.5 x ULN. In case of liver metastases AP \>5 x ULN
* Total bilirubin \>1.0 x ULN
* Serum Creatinine \>1.5 x ULN. If creatinine 1.0 - 1.5 x ULN, creatinine clearance will be calculated according to Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula, and creatinine clearance \<60 milliliter per minute (mL/min) was exclude the participant.
The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sanofi
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clinical Sciences & Operations
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Sanofi
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Investigational Site Number 840007
Muscle Shoals, Alabama, United States
Investigational Site Number 840005
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Investigational Site Number 840006
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Investigational Site Number 840003
Middletown, Ohio, United States
Investigational Site Number 840001
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Investigational Site Number 076001
Porto Alegre, , Brazil
Investigational Site Number 124003
Montreal, , Canada
Investigational Site Number 124002
Oshawa, , Canada
Investigational Site Number 124004
Rimouski, , Canada
Investigational Site Number 124001
Toronto, , Canada
Investigational Site Number 152001
Santiago, , Chile
Investigational Site Number 152005
Santiago, , Chile
Investigational Site Number 250005
Brest, , France
Investigational Site Number 250004
Caen, , France
Investigational Site Number 250006
La Tronche, , France
Investigational Site Number 250002
Lille, , France
Investigational Site Number 250003
Saint-Herblain, , France
Investigational Site Number 250007
Villejuif, , France
Investigational Site Number 276003
Großhansdorf, , Germany
Investigational Site Number 276006
Löwenstein, , Germany
Investigational Site Number 300005
Athens, , Greece
Investigational Site Number 300003
Athens, , Greece
Investigational Site Number 300001
Heraklion, , Greece
Investigational Site Number 300002
Thessaloniki, , Greece
Investigational Site Number 300004
Thessaloniki, , Greece
Investigational Site Number 348001
Budapest, , Hungary
Investigational Site Number 348004
Budapest, , Hungary
Investigational Site Number 348002
Budapest, , Hungary
Investigational Site Number 348003
Törökbálint, , Hungary
Investigational Site Number 380001
Genova, , Italy
Investigational Site Number 380002
Livorno, , Italy
Investigational Site Number 380005
Novara, , Italy
Investigational Site Number 380004
Parma, , Italy
Investigational Site Number 578001
Oslo, , Norway
Investigational Site Number 578003
Stavanger, , Norway
Investigational Site Number 578002
Trondheim, , Norway
Investigational Site Number 616004
Gdansk, , Poland
Investigational Site Number 616003
Lublin, , Poland
Investigational Site Number 616002
Poznan, , Poland
Investigational Site Number 616001
Warsaw, , Poland
Investigational Site Number 642003
Cluj-Napoca, , Romania
Investigational Site Number 642005
Cluj-Napoca, , Romania
Investigational Site Number 642001
Craiova, , Romania
Investigational Site Number 642002
Timișoara, , Romania
Investigational Site Number 643001
Moscow, , Russia
Investigational Site Number 643005
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Investigational Site Number 643006
Tula, , Russia
Investigational Site Number 643003
Yaroslavl, , Russia
Investigational Site Number 410001
Seoul, , South Korea
Investigational Site Number 410003
Seoul, , South Korea
Investigational Site Number 410002
Seoul, , South Korea
Investigational Site Number 724002
Badalona, , Spain
Investigational Site Number 724004
Barcelona, , Spain
Investigational Site Number 724005
Málaga, , Spain
Investigational Site Number 724001
Valencia, , Spain
Investigational Site Number 804002
Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine
Investigational Site Number 804004
Donetsk, , Ukraine
Investigational Site Number 804001
Lviv, , Ukraine
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Beaumont H, Evans TL, Klifa C, Guermazi A, Hong SR, Chadjaa M, Monostori Z. Discrepancies of assessments in a RECIST 1.1 phase II clinical trial - association between adjudication rate and variability in images and tumors selection. Cancer Imaging. 2018 Dec 11;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40644-018-0186-0.
Evans TL, Cho BC, Udud K, Fischer JR, Shepherd FA, Martinez P, Ramlau R, Syrigos KN, Shen L, Chadjaa M, Wolf M. Cabazitaxel Versus Topotecan in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Progressive Disease During or After First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Aug;10(8):1221-8. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000588.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-003415-31
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
U1111-1123-3503
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ARD12166
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.