SCLC on the 2nd Line With Relapsed After Response to Chemotherapy GFPC 01-2013

NCT ID: NCT02738346

Last Updated: 2016-04-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

164 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-07-31

Study Completion Date

2017-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to determine prospectively in all patients with SCLC in second line therapy that progression-free survival with the expected reintroduction of platinum / etoposide is greater progression-free survival in the standard arm (topotecan ) in patients who have relapsed at least three months after initial chemotherapy with platinum-etoposide

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Topotecan is currently the only drug approved in Europe and the United States for the treatment of second line of SCLC when the recovery first line of treatment is considered inappropriate. This raises the problem of knowing when the recovery first line of treatment should be considered appropriate. Secondly, the effectiveness of response to chemotherapy can be predicted based on the response to initial chemotherapy and the time interval after stopping first line treatment. A complete response after initial treatment and a long disease-free interval are predictors of better response to a second-line treatment. There are two groups: the said patients 'sensitive', which correspond to the first-line chemotherapy and who have relapsed at least 90 days after the first-line treatment and a group of so-called patients "Refractory" refers patients who progress in 90 days or patients who have not responded or progressed during first-line treatment. Median survival is very different depending on whether patients with so-called "sensitive" or "refractory".

When relapse occurs six months after the end of the first line chemotherapy, the usual practice is to reintroduce the first-line treatment. This is based on old studies where the number of patients included was low. If the interval of time after the first line of treatment is ≥ three months, two second-line treatment strategies are possible resumption of initial chemotherapy or topotecan. The combination of cisplatin with etoposide have shown high response rate, whatever the time of relapse. There are, however, no randomized study in the literature comparing topotecan to the reintroduction of a platinum salt associated etoposide.

This study is Randomized, multicenter, controlled, open-label, second line, 2 arms.

Arm A : Carboplatin Auc 5 J1 Etoposide 100 mg / m² / J J1 to J3 IV Arm B : topotecan 2.3 mg / m²J1 to J5 po

1 line by Etoposide Cisplatin or carboplatin etoposide Time interval between the first-line chemotherapy and relapse ≥ 90 days (the date is set at J1 of the last cycle) J-28: TDM thoracoabdominal, brain CT or MRI brain, J 7: Biology, quality of life questionnaire (Lung Cancer Symptom Scale). Assessment of tumor response every 6 weeks during chemotherapy post-chemotherapy followed 2nd line: TDM every 8 weeks until progression or death.

The duration of the participation of each patient included in the trial will be from inclusion through 12 months.

The planned total duration of the trial will be 5 years including 4 years of patient inclusion

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Small Cell Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A : Carboplatin-Etoposide

Intravenous administration of Carboplatin Auc 5 at Day 1 and Intravenous administration of 100 mg / m² / of Etoposide J Day 1 to Day 3 The CT scans evaluations will be conducted during chemotherapy every 6 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Carboplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous administration of Carboplatin AUC 5 at Day 1, Every 3 weeks, maximum 6 cycles

Etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous administration of 100mg/m²/day of Etoposide, Day 1 to Day 3 Every 3 weeks, maximum 6 cycles

CT scans

Intervention Type DEVICE

The CT scan evaluations will be conducted during chemotherapy every 6 weeks

Arm B : Topotecan

Per os administration of 2.3 mg / m² of Topotecan Day 1 to Day 5 The CT scans evaluations will be conducted during chemotherapy every 6 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Topotecan

Intervention Type DRUG

Per os administration of 2.3 mg / m2 of Topotecan, Day 1 to Day 5 Every 3 weeks, maximum 6 cycles

CT scans

Intervention Type DEVICE

The CT scan evaluations will be conducted during chemotherapy every 6 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Carboplatin

Intravenous administration of Carboplatin AUC 5 at Day 1, Every 3 weeks, maximum 6 cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

Etoposide

Intravenous administration of 100mg/m²/day of Etoposide, Day 1 to Day 3 Every 3 weeks, maximum 6 cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

Topotecan

Per os administration of 2.3 mg / m2 of Topotecan, Day 1 to Day 5 Every 3 weeks, maximum 6 cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

CT scans

The CT scan evaluations will be conducted during chemotherapy every 6 weeks

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Lung Cancer Small cell histologically confirmed.
* SCLC stage IV according to the TNM classification in 2009
* Relapse localized SCLC treated with chemoradiotherapy if they are outside the radiation field.
* Patients who have had an objective response to first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide or carboplatin and etoposide and have a time interval \> or = 90 days between relapse and first-line chemotherapy (the date is set J1 of the last cycle)
* At least one-dimensionally measurable disease (RECIST)
* Age \> or = 18 years
* Weight loss \<10% during the last 3 months
* Performance status (PS) \< or = 2
* Creatinine clearance\> 45 ml / min.
* Neutrophils \>1,5X10 9 / L and platelets \> 100X109 / L.
* Bilirubin \< 1,5 X normal.
* Transaminases, alkaline phosphatase \< 2,5 X normal except in cases of hepatic metastases (5 X normal).
* Informed Consent signed
* Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases may be included
* Prophylactic brain irradiation based on the habits of each center defined in advance

Exclusion Criteria

* Lung cancer non-small cell or mixed form (small cell / non-small cell) or absence of histological evidence
* SCLC stage I or stage II or stage III.
* Patients who have not had an objective response to first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide or carboplatin and etoposide or that have a time interval \< 90 days between relapse and first-line chemotherapy (the date is defined in J1 of the last cycle)
* Serum Na \< 125 mmol / L
* Hypercalcemia despite corrective treatment
* Brain metastases or symptomatic meningeal
* A history of malignancy within the last 5 years with the exception of basal cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
* Other concomitant serious medical conditions: congestive heart failure, unstable angina, significant arrhythmia or previous myocardial in the previous six months trial
* Severe or uncontrolled systemic diseases, the investigator found incompatible with the proposed protocol
* Neurological and psychiatric disorders prohibiting comprehension test
* Severe infectious disease during or fever \> 38 ° C
* Peripheral neuropathy \> or = grade 2
* Any geographical or psychological condition does not allow a proper understanding and compliance with the protocol.
* Private Patient freedom following a judicial or administrative decision
* Pregnant woman, parturient or nursing; Women of childbearing potential and men with a woman of childbearing age must have adequate contraception for the duration of the study and up to 6 months after treatment ends.
* Patient in an exclusion period for another Biomedical study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Angers

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nathalie BAIZE

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Angers University Hospital Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Angers University Hospital

Angers, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nathalie BAIZE

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Nathalie BAIZE

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Baize N, Monnet I, Greillier L, Geier M, Lena H, Janicot H, Vergnenegre A, Crequit J, Lamy R, Auliac JB, Letreut J, Le Caer H, Gervais R, Dansin E, Madroszyk A, Renault PA, Le Garff G, Falchero L, Berard H, Schott R, Saulnier P, Chouaid C; Groupe Francais de Pneumo-Cancerologie 01-13 investigators. Carboplatin plus etoposide versus topotecan as second-line treatment for patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Sep;21(9):1224-1233. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30461-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32888454 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GFPC 01-2013

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CHU-P 2012-08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.