Effect of Mobilizations and Exercises Targeting the Opening of Intervertebral Foramens Following Cervical Radiculopathy

NCT ID: NCT01500044

Last Updated: 2013-07-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this randomised clinical trial (RCT) is to compare, in terms of disability and pain, an intervention targeting the opening of intervertebral foramens to a conventional physiotherapy intervention, in patients presenting acute or subacute cervical radiculopathies. Based on biomechanical principles, the investigators hypothesis is that the intervention targeting the opening of intervertebral foramens will be significantly more effective in reducing pain and disability than the conventional physiotherapy intervention.

This study is double-blind RCT that will allow the comparison of patients with a cervical radiculopathy randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group will receive a 4-week rehabilitation program targeting the opening of intervertebral foramen, and the second group will receive a 4-week conventional rehabilitation program. Thirty-six subjects will be recruited from participating medical and physiotherapy clinics in the Quebec City area (Canada) and will be evaluated at baseline, at the end of the program and four weeks following the end of the program. The primary outcome measure will be the validated Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire and other secondary measures will include the QuickDASH questionnaire, a numerical pain rating scale, cervicothoracic mobility and patients' perceived global rating of change.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cervical radiculopathy is a common form of neck pain and has been shown to lead to severe disability. Clinical rehabilitation approaches for cervical radiculopathies commonly include exercise and manual therapy interventions targeting the opening of intervertebral foramen but evidence regarding their effectiveness is scarce.

This double-blind randomised clinical trial will allow the comparison, in terms of pain and disability, of patients presenting a cervical radiculopathy which will have been randomly assigned to one of the two intervention groups: the first group (n = 18) will receive a 4-week rehabilitation program targeting the opening of intervertebral foramen, the second group (n = 18) will receive a 4-week conventional rehabilitation program. Participants will be evaluated on three separate occasions: at baseline (week 0), at the end of the 4-week program (week 4), and four weeks following the end of the program (week 8).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Radiculopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional Rehabilitation Program

The conventional program consists in cervicothoracic mobilizations and stabilization exercises. This program is based on the intervention used in clinical practice, and on programs proposed in two RCTs evaluating individuals with neck and arm pain that do not include any specific mobilization or exercise leading to the opening of the intervertebral foramen. Four mobilisation techniques will be executed at each treatment session. However, the therapists will not be allowed to use techniques that specifically open the intervertebral foramen of the affected segment, two segments above and two segments below.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Rehabilitation Program

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Program used in previous randomized clinical trials in this population

Program targeting the opening of foramen

The same interventions as for the conventional rehabilitation program will be applied, except:

Of the four mobilisation techniques, there will be two mandatory techniques targeting the opening of the intervertebral foramen on the same side and at the same level as the radiculopathy: global contralateral rotation mobilisation and ipsilateral lateral shearing in a flexion position. The therapist, according to the biomechanical evaluation results, will choose the two other mobilisation techniques.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Program targeting the opening of foramen

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Rehabilitation intervention that specifically targets the opening of the intervertebral foramen

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Program targeting the opening of foramen

Rehabilitation intervention that specifically targets the opening of the intervertebral foramen

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional Rehabilitation Program

Program used in previous randomized clinical trials in this population

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Specific manual Therapy, Mobilization, Exercises Non specific manual therapy, mobilization and exercises

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* pain, paresthesia or numbness in the upper-limb with cervical or periscapular pain for less than 3 months
* at least one neurological sign (dermatomes, myotomes or reflexes) of an inferior motoneuron lesion to the upper-limb
* positive responses to at least 3 of the 4 following clinical tests: Spurling Test, Upper Limb Tension Test, Cervical Distraction Test, and less than 60o of cervical rotation on the impaired side

Exclusion Criteria

* prior surgery to the cervicothoracic spine
* bilateral upper-limb symptoms
* signs of superior motoneuron impairments (bilateral paresthesia, hyperreflexia, spasticity)
* cervical spine infiltration in the previous four weeks
* current use of steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Laval University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jean-Sébastien Roy

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean-Sebastien Roy, PT, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Laval University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Langevin P, Desmeules F, Lamothe M, Robitaille S, Roy JS. Comparison of 2 manual therapy and exercise protocols for cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial evaluating short-term effects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Jan;45(1):4-17. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.5211.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25420010 (View on PubMed)

Langevin P, Roy JS, Desmeules F. Cervical radiculopathy: study protocol of a randomised clinical trial evaluating the effect of mobilisations and exercises targeting the opening of intervertebral foramen [NCT01500044]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jan 31;13:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22293092 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

11-12-#09

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Physiotherapy After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery
NCT03036007 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA