Safety and Efficacy of E/C/F/TAF (Genvoya®) Versus E/C/F/TDF (Stribild®) in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults

NCT ID: NCT01497899

Last Updated: 2018-11-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

279 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-12-28

Study Completion Date

2016-08-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (Genvoya®; E/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) versus elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Stribild®; E/C/F/TDF) FDC in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral treatment-naive adults.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome HIV Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

E/C/F/TAF

E/C/F/TAF plus E/C/F/TDF placebo for at least 48 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

E/C/F/TAF

Intervention Type DRUG

150/150/200/10 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily

E/C/F/TDF Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablet administered orally once daily

E/C/F/TDF

E/C/F/TDF plus E/C/F/TAF placebo for at least 48 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

E/C/F/TDF

Intervention Type DRUG

150/150/200/300 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily

E/C/F/TAF Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablet administered orally once daily

E/C/F/TAF Open-Label

Following study unblinding, participants from the E/C/F/TAF and E/C/F/TDF arms may have the option to receive E/C/F/TAF during an open-label extension phase.

Also, participants who are actively participating in a Gilead-sponsored study of cobicistat-boosted darunavir plus nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) who have reached the protocol-defined secondary endpoint (Week 48) and remain virologically suppressed are eligible to participate and receive E/C/F/TAF in this open-label extension phase.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

E/C/F/TAF

Intervention Type DRUG

150/150/200/10 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

E/C/F/TDF

150/150/200/300 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

E/C/F/TAF Placebo

Tablet administered orally once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

E/C/F/TAF

150/150/200/10 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

E/C/F/TDF Placebo

Tablet administered orally once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Stribild® Genvoya®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Ability to understand and sign a written informed consent form
* Plasma HIV 1 RNA levels ≥ 5,000 copies/mL
* No prior use of any approved or experimental anti-HIV drug for any length of time
* Screening genotype report must show sensitivity to TDF and emtricitabine (FTC)
* Normal ECG
* Adequate renal function: Estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 70 mL/min according to the Cockcroft Gault formula
* Hepatic transaminases ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of the normal range (ULN)
* Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL, or normal direct bilirubin
* Adequate hematologic function
* CD4+ cell count \> 50 cells/µL
* Serum amylase ≤ 5 x ULN
* Normal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)
* Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test
* Females of childbearing potential must agree to utilize highly effective contraception methods from screening throughout the duration of study treatment and for 30 days following the last dose of study drugs
* Female subjects who utilize hormonal contraceptive as one of their birth control methods must have used the same method for at least three months prior to study dosing
* Female subjects who are postmenopausal must have documentation of cessation of menses for ≥ 12 months and hormonal failure
* Female subjects who have stopped menstruating for ≥ 12 months but do not have documentation of ovarian hormonal failure must have a serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level test at screening
* Male subjects must agree to utilize a highly effective method of contraception during heterosexual intercourse throughout the study period and for 90 days following discontinuation of investigational medicinal product
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Life expectancy ≥ 1 year

Exclusion Criteria

* New AIDS-defining condition diagnosed within the 30 days prior to screening
* Hepatitis B surface Antigen positive
* Hepatitis C Antibody positive
* Proven acute hepatitis in the 30 days prior to study entry
* Subjects experiencing decompensated cirrhosis
* Females who are breastfeeding
* Positive serum pregnancy test (female of childbearing potential)
* Have an implanted defibrillator or pacemaker
* Receiving ongoing therapy with any of the disallowed medications, including drugs not to be used with elvitegravir and cobicistat
* Have been treated with immunosuppressant therapies or chemotherapeutic agents within 3 months of study screening, or expected to receive these agents or systemic steroids during the study
* Current alcohol or substance
* History of or ongoing malignancy (including untreated carcinoma in-situ) other than cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), basal cell carcinoma or resected, non-invasive cutaneous squamous carcinoma
* Active, serious infections (other than HIV 1 infection) requiring parenteral antibiotic or antifungal therapy within 30 days prior to Baseline
* Participation in any other clinical trial without prior approval is prohibited while participating in this trial
* Medications contraindicated for use with emtricitabine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
* Any known allergies to the excipients of E/C/F/TAF or E/C/F/TDF FDC tablets
* Any other clinical condition or prior therapy that would make the subject unsuitable for the study or unable to comply with the dosing requirements
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gilead Sciences

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gilead Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Gilead Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB)

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Spectrum Medical Group

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

AHF Research Center

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Peter J. Ruane, MD, Inc.

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Anthony Mills MD, Inc

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

East Bay AIDS Center

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford University

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente Medical Group

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

La Playa Medical Group and Clinical Research

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Metropolis Medical

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente Medical Group-Clinical Trials Unit

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Apex Research, LLC

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Dupont Circle Physician's Group

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Whitman-Walker Health

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Capital Medical Associates, PC

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Gary J. Richmond,M.D.,P.A.

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Wohlfeiler, Piperato and Associates, LLC

Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando Immunology Center

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

IDOCF/ValuhealthMD, LLC

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Joseph's Comprehensive Research Institute

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Infectious Disease Specialists of Atlanta

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Mercer University Mercer Medicine

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Howard Brown Health Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Be Well Medical Center

Berkley, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Health System

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Hennepin County Medical Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Central West Clinical Research Inc

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

North Shore University Hospital / Division of Infectious Diseases

Manhasset, New York, United States

Site Status

ID Consultants, P.A.

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of South Carolina School of Medicine Division of Infectious Disease

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Southwest Infectious Disease Clinical Research Inc

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tarrant County Infectious Disease Associates

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Therapeutic Concepts, PA

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Gordon E. Crofoot, MD., PA

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

DCOL Center for Clinical Research

Longview, Texas, United States

Site Status

Peter Shalit, M.D.

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Clinical Research Puerto Rico

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Puerto Rico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sax PE, Zolopa A, Brar I, Elion R, Ortiz R, Post F, Wang H, Callebaut C, Martin H, Fordyce MW, McCallister S. Tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in single tablet regimens for initial HIV-1 therapy: a randomized phase 2 study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014 Sep 1;67(1):52-8. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000225.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24872136 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GS-US-292-0102

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.