Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil Used in Combination With Metformin in Participants With Hypertension and Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT01496430

Last Updated: 2015-05-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

105 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antihypertensive and antiglycemic effects, as well as the safety and tolerability of TAK-491 (azilsartan medoxomil), once daily (QD), in stage 1 hypertensive, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) participants whose glycemic control was inadequate on metformin alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study included a Screening Period of up to 4 weeks, which coincided with a 2-week single-blind, placebo Run-in Period, a 24 week Treatment Period, and a 2-week Follow-up Period. The duration of the study was approximately 30 weeks. The planned number of participants (n=450) was not reached; actual enrollment consisted of 105 particpants. Due to low enrollment this study was terminated early by Takeda.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo QD

Azilsartan medoxomil placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD

Azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TAK-491 TAK-491

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Was male or female and ≥18 years.
2. Had type 2 diabetes mellitus with HbA1c of ≥7.5 to ≤9.5% at Screening.
3. Was treated with metformin alone (no treatment with any antidiabetic agents other than metformin within the 3 months prior to Screening) and was experiencing inadequate glycemic control. The participant should have received metformin monotherapy for ≥8 weeks prior to Screening at a stable dose ≥1500 mg). Participants with a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) that was documented to be less than 1500 mg of metformin could also be enrolled if this dose had been stable for 8 weeks prior to Screening.
4. Was treated with antihypertensive therapy and had a mean, trough, sitting clinic systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥135 and \< 160 mm Hg on Day -1 (after washout of prior antihypertensive therapy) or the participant had not received antihypertensive treatment within 28 days before Screening and had a mean sitting clinic SBP ≥135 and \< 160 mm Hg at the Screening Visit and on Day -1.
5. Had clinical laboratory evaluations (including clinical chemistry, hematology, and complete urinalysis) within the reference range for the testing laboratory or results that were deemed not clinically significant in this participant population for inclusion in this study, by the investigator.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Had a mean, trough, sitting clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 100 mm Hg at Day -1.
2. Had type 1 or poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (HbA1c \>9.5%) at Screening.
3. Was taking or expected to take an excluded medication.
4. Had a history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack.
5. Had clinically significant cardiac conduction defects (for example, 3rd degree atrioventricular block, left bundle branch block, sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation).
6. Had hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic valvular disease.
7. Had secondary hypertension of any etiology (e.g., renovascular disease, pheochromocytoma, Cushing's syndrome).
8. Had renal dysfunction defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at Screening.
9. Had albuminuria defined as \>200 mg/g at Screening.
10. Had known or suspected unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis.
11. Had unexplained microhematuria ≥3 RBCs/HPF or macrohematuria at Screening and confirmed on repeat testing.
12. Treatment with antidiabetic agents (sulfonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glinides, thiazolidinediones (TZDs), and/or insulin) other than metformin during the 3 months prior to Screening.
13. Had hyperkalemia as defined by central laboratory normal reference range at Screening.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Director, Clinical Science

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Green Valley, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Buena Park, California, United States

Site Status

Hawaiian Gardens, California, United States

Site Status

Norwalk, California, United States

Site Status

Paramount, California, United States

Site Status

Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Brooksville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hallandale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evergreen Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Gurnee, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Avon, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Greenfield, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Margate City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Calabash, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Lenoir, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Morehead City, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Centerville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Downingtown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Fleetwood, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Irving, Texas, United States

Site Status

North Richland Hills, Texas, United States

Site Status

Pearland, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Burke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Manassas, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1125-1197

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TAK-491_304

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.