Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil Used in Combination With Metformin in Participants With Hypertension and Diabetes
NCT ID: NCT01496430
Last Updated: 2015-05-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
105 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-01-31
2013-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Efficacy of Dapagliflozin in Triple Therapy to Treat Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT01646320
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Once Daily Oral Administration of AZD5004 Versus Placebo for 26 Weeks in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
NCT06579105
Safety and Tolerability of AZD1656 in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) Patients Treated With Metformin and Sulfonylurea
NCT00995787
Efficacy and Safety Study of Rosiglitazone/Metformin Therapy vs Rosiglitazone and Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes Subjects
NCT00499707
To Evaluate Safety and Tolerability After Multiple Oral Doses of AZD1656 in Type 2 Diabetes Patients on Top of Metformin
NCT00774553
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo QD
Azilsartan medoxomil placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.
Placebo
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD
Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.
Azilsartan medoxomil
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD
Azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.
Azilsartan medoxomil
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Placebo
Azilsartan medoxomil
Azilsartan medoxomil
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Had type 2 diabetes mellitus with HbA1c of ≥7.5 to ≤9.5% at Screening.
3. Was treated with metformin alone (no treatment with any antidiabetic agents other than metformin within the 3 months prior to Screening) and was experiencing inadequate glycemic control. The participant should have received metformin monotherapy for ≥8 weeks prior to Screening at a stable dose ≥1500 mg). Participants with a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) that was documented to be less than 1500 mg of metformin could also be enrolled if this dose had been stable for 8 weeks prior to Screening.
4. Was treated with antihypertensive therapy and had a mean, trough, sitting clinic systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥135 and \< 160 mm Hg on Day -1 (after washout of prior antihypertensive therapy) or the participant had not received antihypertensive treatment within 28 days before Screening and had a mean sitting clinic SBP ≥135 and \< 160 mm Hg at the Screening Visit and on Day -1.
5. Had clinical laboratory evaluations (including clinical chemistry, hematology, and complete urinalysis) within the reference range for the testing laboratory or results that were deemed not clinically significant in this participant population for inclusion in this study, by the investigator.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Had type 1 or poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (HbA1c \>9.5%) at Screening.
3. Was taking or expected to take an excluded medication.
4. Had a history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack.
5. Had clinically significant cardiac conduction defects (for example, 3rd degree atrioventricular block, left bundle branch block, sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation).
6. Had hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic valvular disease.
7. Had secondary hypertension of any etiology (e.g., renovascular disease, pheochromocytoma, Cushing's syndrome).
8. Had renal dysfunction defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at Screening.
9. Had albuminuria defined as \>200 mg/g at Screening.
10. Had known or suspected unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis.
11. Had unexplained microhematuria ≥3 RBCs/HPF or macrohematuria at Screening and confirmed on repeat testing.
12. Treatment with antidiabetic agents (sulfonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glinides, thiazolidinediones (TZDs), and/or insulin) other than metformin during the 3 months prior to Screening.
13. Had hyperkalemia as defined by central laboratory normal reference range at Screening.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Takeda
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Director, Clinical Science
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Takeda
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Green Valley, Arizona, United States
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Buena Park, California, United States
Hawaiian Gardens, California, United States
Norwalk, California, United States
Paramount, California, United States
Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States
Sacramento, California, United States
San Diego, California, United States
Tustin, California, United States
Denver, Colorado, United States
Bradenton, Florida, United States
Brooksville, Florida, United States
Hallandale, Florida, United States
Jupiter, Florida, United States
Miami, Florida, United States
Orlando, Florida, United States
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Tampa, Florida, United States
Winter Park, Florida, United States
Roswell, Georgia, United States
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Evergreen Park, Illinois, United States
Gurnee, Illinois, United States
Avon, Indiana, United States
Greenfield, Indiana, United States
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Paducah, Kentucky, United States
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Columbia, Missouri, United States
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Margate City, New Jersey, United States
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Brooklyn, New York, United States
Calabash, North Carolina, United States
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Lenoir, North Carolina, United States
Morehead City, North Carolina, United States
Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Centerville, Ohio, United States
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Downingtown, Pennsylvania, United States
Fleetwood, Pennsylvania, United States
Reading, Pennsylvania, United States
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Anderson, South Carolina, United States
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Dallas, Texas, United States
Houston, Texas, United States
Irving, Texas, United States
North Richland Hills, Texas, United States
Pearland, Texas, United States
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Burke, Virginia, United States
Manassas, Virginia, United States
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
U1111-1125-1197
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
TAK-491_304
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.