Saxagliptin Treatment in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Are Not Controlled With Diet and Exercise
NCT ID: NCT00121641
Last Updated: 2015-04-03
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
1035 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-07-31
2010-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study Assessing Saxagliptin Treatment In Type 2 Diabetic Subjects Who Are Not Controlled With Metformin Alone
NCT00121667
Study of BMS-477118 as Monotherapy With Titration in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Are Not Controlled With Diet and Exercise
NCT00316082
A Phase 3 Study of BMS-477118 in Combination With Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Are Not Controlled With Diet and Exercise
NCT00327015
A Study Assessing Saxagliptin Treatment in Type 2 Diabetic Subjects Who Are Not Controlled With TZD Therapy Alone
NCT00295633
Safety and Efficacy of Combination Saxagliptin & Dapagliflozin Added to Metformin to Treat Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT01606007
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg (A)
Metformin 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)
Saxagliptin
Tablets, Oral, 2.5 mg, Once daily (24 weeks short term \[ST\], 42 months long term \[LT\])
Placebo matching Metformin
Tablets, Oral, 0 mg, daily (42 months LT)
Metformin
Tablets, Oral, 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)
Saxagliptin 5 mg (B)
Metformin 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)
Saxagliptin
Tablets, Oral, 5 mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)
Placebo matching Metformin
Tablets, Oral, 0 mg, daily (42 months LT)
Metformin
Tablets, Oral, 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)
Saxagliptin 10 mg (C)
Metformin 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)
Saxagliptin
Tablets, Oral, 10 mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)
Placebo matching Metformin
Tablets, Oral, 0 mg, daily (42 months LT)
Metformin
Tablets, Oral, 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)
Placebo (D)
Metformin 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)
Placebo matching Saxagliptin
Tablets, Oral, 0mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)
Metformin
Tablets, Oral, 500 mg, daily (42 months LT)
Metformin
Tablets, Oral, 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)
Open-Label Treatment Cohort (Direct Enrollees) (E)
Saxagliptin 10 mg
Metformin 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)
Saxagliptin
Tablets, Oral, 10 mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT) Open Label
Metformin
Tablets, Oral, 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Saxagliptin
Tablets, Oral, 2.5 mg, Once daily (24 weeks short term \[ST\], 42 months long term \[LT\])
Saxagliptin
Tablets, Oral, 5 mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)
Saxagliptin
Tablets, Oral, 10 mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)
Placebo matching Saxagliptin
Tablets, Oral, 0mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)
Metformin
Tablets, Oral, 500 mg, daily (42 months LT)
Placebo matching Metformin
Tablets, Oral, 0 mg, daily (42 months LT)
Saxagliptin
Tablets, Oral, 10 mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT) Open Label
Metformin
Tablets, Oral, 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Drug naive
* Hemoglobin (Hb) A1c \>= 7.0% and \<= 10.0% (\>10% and \<= 12% for open label arm)
* Fasting C-peptide \>= 1 ng/mL
* Body mass index \<= 40 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
* Recent cardiac or cerebrovascular event
* Serum creatinine \>= 1.5 mg/dL for males and \>= 1.4 mg/dL for Women of Child Bearing Potential
18 Years
77 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AstraZeneca
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Local Institution
Anniston, Alabama, United States
Local Institution
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Local Institution
Calera, Alabama, United States
Local Institution
Jonesboro, Arizona, United States
Local Institution
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Local Institution
Pheonix, Arizona, United States
Local Institution
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Local Institution
Anaheim, California, United States
Local Institution
Fountain Valley, California, United States
Local Institution
Fresno, California, United States
Local Institution
Long Beach, California, United States
Local Institution
Los Angeles, California, United States
Local Institution
Northridge, California, United States
Local Institution
Rolling Hills Estates, California, United States
Local Institution
Sacramento, California, United States
Local Institution
Santa Ana, California, United States
Local Institution
Spring Valley, California, United States
Local Institution
Tustin, California, United States
Local Institution
Castle Rock, Colorado, United States
Local Institution
Denver, Colorado, United States
Local Institution
Loveland, Colorado, United States
Local Institution
Altamonte Springs, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Chipley, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Cocoa Beach, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Jupiter, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Kissimmee, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Marianna, Florida, United States
Local Institution
New Port Richey, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Ocala, Florida, United States
Local Institution
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Vernon Hills, Illinois, United States
Local Institution
Dubuque, Iowa, United States
Local Institution
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Local Institution
Waterloo, Iowa, United States
Local Institution
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Local Institution
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Local Institution
Munfordville, Kentucky, United States
Local Institution
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Local Institution
West Monroe, Louisiana, United States
Local Institution
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Local Institution
Chester, Maryland, United States
Local Institution
Prince Frederick, Maryland, United States
Local Institution
Ayer, Massachusetts, United States
Local Institution
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Local Institution
Rolling Fork, Mississippi, United States
Local Institution
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Local Institution
Springfield, Missouri, United States
Local Institution
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Local Institution
Kalispell, Montana, United States
Local Institution
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Local Institution
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Local Institution
Middletown, New Jersey, United States
Local Institution
Toms River, New Jersey, United States
Local Institution
Cooperstown, New York, United States
Local Institution
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Local Institution
Huntersville, North Carolina, United States
Local Institution
Sparta, North Carolina, United States
Local Institution
Statesville, North Carolina, United States
Local Institution
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Local Institution
Athens, Ohio, United States
Local Institution
Franklin, Ohio, United States
Local Institution
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Local Institution
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Local Institution
Portland, Oregon, United States
Local Institution
Fleetwood, Pennsylvania, United States
Local Institution
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Local Institution
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Local Institution
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Local Institution
Bristol, Tennessee, United States
Local Institution
Morristown, Tennessee, United States
Local Institution
Bryan, Texas, United States
Local Institution
Dallas, Texas, United States
Local Institution
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Local Institution
Houston, Texas, United States
Local Institution
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Local Institution
Temple, Texas, United States
Local Institution
Texarkana, Texas, United States
Local Institution
The Colony, Texas, United States
Local Institution
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Local Institution
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
Local Institution
Olympia, Washington, United States
Local Institution
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Local Institution
Woollongong, New South Wales, Australia
Local Institution
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Local Institution
Kippa-Ring, Queensland, Australia
Local Institution
Meadowbrook, Queensland, Australia
Local Institution
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Local Institution
Woodville South, South Australia, Australia
Local Institution
Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Local Institution
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Local Institution
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Local Institution
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Local Institution
Quesnel, British Columbia, Canada
Local Institution
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Local Institution
Portage la Prairie, Manitoba, Canada
Local Institution
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Local Institution
Bathurst, New Brunswick, Canada
Local Institution
Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
Local Institution
Manuels, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Local Institution
Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Local Institution
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Local Institution
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Local Institution
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
Local Institution
Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
Local Institution
Sarnia, Ontario, Canada
Local Institution
Strathroy, Ontario, Canada
Local Institution
Thornhill, Ontario, Canada
Local Institution
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Local Institution
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada
Local Institution
Drummondville, Quebec, Canada
Local Institution
Fleurimont, Quebec, Canada
Local Institution
Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
Local Institution
Granby, Quebec, Canada
Local Institution
Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
Local Institution
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Local Institution
Saint-Léonard, Quebec, Canada
Local Institution
Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada
Local Institution
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Local Institution
Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico
Local Institution
Durango, Durango, Mexico
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Local Institution
Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
Local Institution
Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
Local Institution
Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico
Local Institution
Carolina, , Puerto Rico
Local Institution
Guaynabo, , Puerto Rico
Local Institution
Ponce, , Puerto Rico
Local Institution
Rio Piedras, , Puerto Rico
Local Institution
San Juan, , Puerto Rico
Local Institution
Hualien City, , Taiwan
Local Institution
Taichung, , Taiwan
Local Institution
Taipei, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rosenstock J, Aguilar-Salinas C, Klein E, Nepal S, List J, Chen R; CV181-011 Study Investigators. Effect of saxagliptin monotherapy in treatment-naive patients with type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Oct;25(10):2401-11. doi: 10.1185/03007990903178735.
Esu E, Berens-Riha N, Pritsch M, Nwachuku N, Loescher T, Meremikwu M. Intermittent screening and treatment with artemether-lumefantrine versus intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for malaria in pregnancy: a facility-based, open-label, non-inferiority trial in Nigeria. Malar J. 2018 Jul 6;17(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2394-2.
Perl S, Cook W, Wei C, Iqbal N, Hirshberg B. Saxagliptin Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment. Diabetes Ther. 2016 Sep;7(3):527-35. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0184-9. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
Bonora E, Bryzinski B, Hirshberg B, Cook W. A post hoc analysis of saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes stratified by UKPDS 10-year cardiovascular risk score. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 May;26(5):374-9. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
Rosenstock J, Gross JL, Aguilar-Salinas C, Hissa M, Berglind N, Ravichandran S, Fleming D. Long-term 4-year safety of saxagliptin in drug-naive and metformin-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013 Dec;30(12):1472-6. doi: 10.1111/dme.12267. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CV181-011
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.