Saxagliptin Treatment in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Are Not Controlled With Diet and Exercise

NCT ID: NCT00121641

Last Updated: 2015-04-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1035 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-07-31

Study Completion Date

2010-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn whether saxagliptin (BMS-477118) is more effective than placebo as a treatment for type 2 diabetic subjects who are not sufficiently controlled with diet and exercise

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All subjects will participate in a lead-in period, and qualifying subjects will continue into a short-term randomized treatment period. Subjects who complete the short-term period will be eligible to enter the long term extension period. Also, subjects in the short-term period who have an elevated blood sugar that requires additional medication for blood sugar control will be eligible to enter the long-term treatment extension period where they will receive metformin added onto their blinded study medication. Subjects with screening hemoglobin A1c (A1C) \> 10.0% and ≤ 12.0%, who otherwise meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria, were eligible to enroll directly into Open-Label Treatment Cohort (Direct Enrollees) and receive open-label saxagliptin 10 mg. Those who completed the short-term period were eligible to enter into the long-term treatment extension period.Saxagliptin dose titration was not permitted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Saxagliptin 2.5 mg (A)

Metformin 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Saxagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 2.5 mg, Once daily (24 weeks short term \[ST\], 42 months long term \[LT\])

Placebo matching Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 0 mg, daily (42 months LT)

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)

Saxagliptin 5 mg (B)

Metformin 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Saxagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 5 mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)

Placebo matching Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 0 mg, daily (42 months LT)

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)

Saxagliptin 10 mg (C)

Metformin 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Saxagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 10 mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)

Placebo matching Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 0 mg, daily (42 months LT)

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)

Placebo (D)

Metformin 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo matching Saxagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 0mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 500 mg, daily (42 months LT)

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)

Open-Label Treatment Cohort (Direct Enrollees) (E)

Saxagliptin 10 mg

Metformin 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Saxagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 10 mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT) Open Label

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Saxagliptin

Tablets, Oral, 2.5 mg, Once daily (24 weeks short term \[ST\], 42 months long term \[LT\])

Intervention Type DRUG

Saxagliptin

Tablets, Oral, 5 mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)

Intervention Type DRUG

Saxagliptin

Tablets, Oral, 10 mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo matching Saxagliptin

Tablets, Oral, 0mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin

Tablets, Oral, 500 mg, daily (42 months LT)

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo matching Metformin

Tablets, Oral, 0 mg, daily (42 months LT)

Intervention Type DRUG

Saxagliptin

Tablets, Oral, 10 mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT) Open Label

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin

Tablets, Oral, 500-2000 mg (as needed for rescue)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

BMS-477118 BMS-477118 BMS-477118 BMS-477118

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Type 2 diabetes mellitus
* Drug naive
* Hemoglobin (Hb) A1c \>= 7.0% and \<= 10.0% (\>10% and \<= 12% for open label arm)
* Fasting C-peptide \>= 1 ng/mL
* Body mass index \<= 40 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

* Symptomatic poorly controlled diabetes
* Recent cardiac or cerebrovascular event
* Serum creatinine \>= 1.5 mg/dL for males and \>= 1.4 mg/dL for Women of Child Bearing Potential
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

77 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Local Institution

Anniston, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Calera, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Jonesboro, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Pheonix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Northridge, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Rolling Hills Estates, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Spring Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Castle Rock, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Loveland, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Altamonte Springs, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Chipley, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Cocoa Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Marianna, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Vernon Hills, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Dubuque, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Waterloo, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Munfordville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

West Monroe, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Chester, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Prince Frederick, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Ayer, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Rolling Fork, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Kalispell, Montana, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Middletown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Toms River, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Cooperstown, New York, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Huntersville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Sparta, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Statesville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Athens, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Franklin, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Fleetwood, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Morristown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Bryan, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Texarkana, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

The Colony, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Olympia, Washington, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Woollongong, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Kippa-Ring, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Meadowbrook, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Woodville South, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Quesnel, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Portage la Prairie, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Bathurst, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Manuels, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Oakville, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Sarnia, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Strathroy, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Thornhill, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Drummondville, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Fleurimont, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Gatineau, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Granby, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Longueuil, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint-Léonard, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Durango, Durango, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Carolina, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Local Institution

Guaynabo, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Local Institution

Ponce, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Local Institution

Rio Piedras, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Local Institution

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Local Institution

Hualien City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Local Institution

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Local Institution

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Canada Mexico Puerto Rico Taiwan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rosenstock J, Aguilar-Salinas C, Klein E, Nepal S, List J, Chen R; CV181-011 Study Investigators. Effect of saxagliptin monotherapy in treatment-naive patients with type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Oct;25(10):2401-11. doi: 10.1185/03007990903178735.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19650754 (View on PubMed)

Esu E, Berens-Riha N, Pritsch M, Nwachuku N, Loescher T, Meremikwu M. Intermittent screening and treatment with artemether-lumefantrine versus intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for malaria in pregnancy: a facility-based, open-label, non-inferiority trial in Nigeria. Malar J. 2018 Jul 6;17(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2394-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29976228 (View on PubMed)

Perl S, Cook W, Wei C, Iqbal N, Hirshberg B. Saxagliptin Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment. Diabetes Ther. 2016 Sep;7(3):527-35. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0184-9. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27402391 (View on PubMed)

Bonora E, Bryzinski B, Hirshberg B, Cook W. A post hoc analysis of saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes stratified by UKPDS 10-year cardiovascular risk score. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 May;26(5):374-9. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27033025 (View on PubMed)

Rosenstock J, Gross JL, Aguilar-Salinas C, Hissa M, Berglind N, Ravichandran S, Fleming D. Long-term 4-year safety of saxagliptin in drug-naive and metformin-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013 Dec;30(12):1472-6. doi: 10.1111/dme.12267. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23802840 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CV181-011

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.