Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Once Daily Oral Administration of AZD5004 Versus Placebo for 26 Weeks in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

NCT ID: NCT06579105

Last Updated: 2026-01-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

406 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-08

Study Completion Date

2025-12-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a Phase IIb, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of AZD5004 in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, compared to placebo and active comparator.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a Phase IIb, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of AZD5004 in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, compared to placebo and active comparator. The study is planned to be conducted in approximately 15 countries, approximately 90 sites will be involved.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
Masking (blinding) applies to patients and investigators involved in AZD5004 and placebo arms, however not in active comparator arm.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1

Participants will receive xx mg once daily dose of AZD5004

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AZD5004

Intervention Type DRUG

AZD5004 film-coated tablet, once daily during 26 weeks

Arm 2

Participants will receive xx mg once daily dose of AZD5004

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AZD5004

Intervention Type DRUG

AZD5004 film-coated tablet, once daily during 26 weeks

Arm 3

Participants will receive xx mg once daily dose of AZD5004

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AZD5004

Intervention Type DRUG

AZD5004 film-coated tablet, once daily during 26 weeks

Arm 4

Participants will receive xx mg once daily dose of AZD5004

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AZD5004

Intervention Type DRUG

AZD5004 film-coated tablet, once daily during 26 weeks

Arm 5

Participants will receive xx mg once daily dose of AZD5004

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AZD5004

Intervention Type DRUG

AZD5004 film-coated tablet, once daily during 26 weeks

Arm 6

Participants will receive xx mg once daily dose of AZD5004

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AZD5004

Intervention Type DRUG

AZD5004 film-coated tablet, once daily during 26 weeks

Arm 7

Participants will receive once daily dose of Semaglutide as active comparator

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Semaglutide

Intervention Type DRUG

3-14 mg tablets of Semaglutide

Arm 8

Participants will receive matching placebo for each AZD5004 arm

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo (placebo matching AZD5004 film-coated tablet)

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo film-coated tablet (matching AZD5004)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo (placebo matching AZD5004 film-coated tablet)

Placebo film-coated tablet (matching AZD5004)

Intervention Type DRUG

AZD5004

AZD5004 film-coated tablet, once daily during 26 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Semaglutide

3-14 mg tablets of Semaglutide

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Rybelsus

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Adults ≥ 18 years of age.

Diagnosed with T2DM for at least 6 months.

HbA1c ≥ 7.0% and ≤ 10.5% managed with diet and exercise alone or with a stable dose of metformin or an SGLT2 inhibitor for at least one month prior to screening.

Body mass index of ≥ 23 kg/m2.

Stable self-reported body weight for 3 months prior to randomization (+/- 5% body weight change).

Exclusion Criteria

Type 1 diabetes mellitus, secondary forms of diabetes or history of ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma.

History of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, diabetic maculopathy, or severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy that required immediate treatment.

Have had more than one episode of severe hypoglycemia within 6 months prior to screening, or has a history of hypoglycemia unawareness or poor recognition of hypoglycemic symptoms.

Received medication for weight loss within the last 3 months prior to screening.

Clinically significant inflammatory bowel disease, gastroparesis, severe disease or surgery affecting the upper GI tract.

Previous or planned (within study period) bariatric surgery or fitting of a weight loss device (eg, gastric balloon or duodenal barrier).

History of acute or chronic pancreatitis.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Sheffield, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Vestavia Hills, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Waterbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lake City, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Largo, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ocoee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lombard, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Potomac, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Roslindale, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Farmington Hills, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Gulfport, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Binghamton, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rocky Mount, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Statesville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Beachwood, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Site

West Chester, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Gaffney, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Abilene, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Manassas, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Kingwood, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Burlington, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Sarnia, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Lévis, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Falkensee, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Oldenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Sankt Ingbert, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Wangen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Chūōku, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Chūōku, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Matsuyama, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Shinjuku-ku, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Tarnów, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Rožňava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Sabinov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Trebišov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Blackpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Chesterfield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Corby, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Dundee, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Rotherham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Yate, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Germany Hungary Japan Poland Slovakia Spain United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-512562-34-00

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

D7261C00001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.