Open-Label Non-Inferiority Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Xeomin® in Subjects With Cervical Dystonia Flex
NCT ID: NCT01486264
Last Updated: 2022-10-27
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
283 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-01-20
2016-03-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
NCT00407030
Trial Evaluating Xeomin® (incobotulinumtoxinA) for Cervical Dystonia or Blepharospasm in the United States
NCT01287247
Efficacy and Safety of MEDITOXIN® in Cervical Dystonia
NCT03905304
A Retrospective Chart Review of BOTOX® and Xeomin® for the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia and Blepharospasm
NCT01814774
A Retrospective Chart Review of BOTOX® and Xeomin® for the Management of Cervical Dystonia and Blepharospasm
NCT02245958
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The current practice for botulinum toxin injection treatment is to inject patients every 3 months. However, not all patients receive continuing benefit from botulinum toxin injections for an entire 3 months. In a recent survey, approximately 45% of patients report that they would prefer a treatment cycle of less than 10 weeks.This study will compare Xeomin®, a botulinum toxin treatment, in shorter treatment intervals (Short Flex dosing) to the standard interval dosing (Long Flex dosing) to determine if the response to treatment is comparable in both how it works and any side effects. Xeomin® is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of CD. The use of Xeomin® is investigational in regards to shorter treatment intervals. An investigational use is one that is not approved by the FDA.
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Short Flex dosing of Xeomin® compared to the Long Flex dosing regimen of Xeomin®, using a standard scale completed by the doctors and subjects as well as questionnaires that ask subjects to rate symptoms of CD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Xeomin® Short Flex
short flex dosing of Xeomin. It is a botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A.
Xeomin®
Xeomin is botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A
Xeomin® Long Flex
long flex dosing of Xeomin. It is a botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A.
Xeomin®
Xeomin is botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Xeomin®
Xeomin is botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
81 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Merz North America, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Kulagowski, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Merz North America, Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Merz Investigative Site #001234
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Merz Investigative Site 001017
Fountain Valley, California, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001225
Loma Linda, California, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001219
Los Angeles, California, United States
Merz Investigative Site # 001276
Manchester, Connecticut, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001231
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001076
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001019
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001046
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001075
Melbourne, Florida, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001217
Port Charlotte, Florida, United States
Merz Investigative Site #1253
Tampa, Florida, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001055
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Merz Investigative Site# 01255
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001215
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Merz Investigative Site # 01069
Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001110
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
Merz Investigative Site # 001071
Elkridge, Maryland, United States
Merz Investigative Site # 001018
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001030
Farmington Hills, Michigan, United States
Merz Investigative Site # 0001275
Eagan, Minnesota, United States
Merz Investigative Site #1250
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001210
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001221
Albany, New York, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001233
New York, New York, United States
Merz Investigative Site #1256
New York, New York, United States
Merz Investigative Site# 01252
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001005
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Merz Investigative Site# 01260
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001009
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Merz Investigative Site #1265
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001220
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Merz Investigative Site #1033
Portland, Oregon, United States
Merz Investigative Site #1251
Portland, Oregon, United States
Merz Investigative Site # 0001271
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Merz Investigative Site #1249
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001206
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Merz Investigative Site #1074
Dallas, Texas, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001223
Dallas, Texas, United States
Merz Investigative Site # 001216
Houston, Texas, United States
Merz Investigative Site# 001266
Houston, Texas, United States
Merz Investigative Site #001224
Kirkland, Washington, United States
Merz Investigative Site #1270
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Comella C, Hauser RA, Isaacson SH, Truong D, Oguh O, Hui J, Molho ES, Brodsky M, Furr-Stimming E, Comes G, Hast MA, Charles D. Efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxinA injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin: Phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study. Clin Park Relat Disord. 2022 Mar 14;6:100142. doi: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100142. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MUS60201_4073_1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.