Comparing Robotics and Laparoscopy With Laparotomy/Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01480999
Last Updated: 2020-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
550 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-11-30
2020-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This project will prospectively examine outcomes of women, with early stage endometrial cancer, treated surgically. Open surgery will be compared to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) which will include conventional laparoscopy and robotic surgery. The data collected will include detailed assessment of surgical data, peri-operative events, quality of life analysis, health economic evaluation and evaluation of MIS rates.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Post Operative Pain in Endometrial Cancer Robotic Versus Laparotomy
NCT00909896
Endometrial Cancer and Robotic-assisted Versus Traditional Laparoscopy
NCT01466777
Comparison of Prognosis in Endometrial Cancer Treated With Different Surgical Methods: Laparoscopy, Robotic-assisted Laparoscopy and Laparotomy
NCT05969405
Perioperative Morbidity in Gyneco-oncology According to the Procedure : Coelioscopy Versus Robot-assisted Coelioscopy
NCT01247779
Evaluation of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology
NCT00671827
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Laparotomy (open surgery)
No interventions assigned to this group
Laparoscopic surgery
No interventions assigned to this group
Robotic assisted surgery
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ECOG Performance status of 0-1
* Suitable candidate for surgery
* Signed approved informed consent
* Female, 18 years of age or older
* Pre-operative health is graded as ASA I-III
* Patients able to complete baseline questions either on their own or with assistance
* Patient willing to comply with scheduled visits
Exclusion Criteria
* Evidence of diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis by imaging or clinical exam
* Unfit for surgery: concomitant disorders incompatible with the study or surgery (at the discretion of the investigator)
* Patients who are breastfeeding or become pregnant during the study
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Health Network, Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marcus Q Bernardini, MD MSc FRCSC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Hopital Notre-Dame du CHUM
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Saskatoon Cancer Centre
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11-0447-CE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.