Perioperative Morbidity in Gyneco-oncology According to the Procedure : Coelioscopy Versus Robot-assisted Coelioscopy
NCT ID: NCT01247779
Last Updated: 2019-03-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
386 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-12-31
2017-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Medico-economic Evaluation of Robot-assisted Laparoscopy Compared With Conventional Laparoscopy in Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
NCT06348719
Cost-Effectiveness and Patients Satisfaction of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications
NCT02865889
Evaluation of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology
NCT00671827
Comparing Robotics and Laparoscopy With Laparotomy/Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer
NCT01480999
Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer
NCT00614211
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, MIS is the selected method in only 9 to 25 % of gynecologic cancer surgery in France. This is likely due to the longer learning curve of MIS compared to laparoscopic open procedure.
In 2001 the FDA allowed the use of robot assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS). This technique adds some advantage to laparoscopic surgery. Indeed, surgeon operates with better precision while seated comfortably at a computer console viewing a 3-D image of the surgical field. Moreover learning curve of RALS is shorter than MIS. Comparative studies between RALS and MIS demonstrate an equivalence of these techniques for operation length and bleeding. However for surgery linked complications and time for recovery of activity, RALS had better results than MIS.
Despite its expensive cost, RALS is now commonly used in North America (90% of prostatectomy and 40% of cancer linked hysterectomy). However RALS need to be evaluated in a randomized clinical trial before it's acceptation in gyneco-oncology in France.
Thus, the purpose of the ROBOGYN clinical trial is to compare clinical benefit of RALS and MIS in a randomized study for patients with cancer of cervix, uterus or ovary.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Coelioscopy
gynecologic surgery - standard coelioscopy
gynecologic surgery - standard coelioscopy
lymphadenectomy; hysterectomy; nerve sparing; enlarged trachelectomy; omentectomy; appendicectomy; pelvectomy
Robot-assisted coelioscopy
gynecologic surgery - robot assisted coelioscopy
gynecologic surgery - robot assisted coelioscopy
lymphadenectomy; hysterectomy; nerve sparing; enlarged trachelectomy; omentectomy; appendicectomy; pelvectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
gynecologic surgery - standard coelioscopy
lymphadenectomy; hysterectomy; nerve sparing; enlarged trachelectomy; omentectomy; appendicectomy; pelvectomy
gynecologic surgery - robot assisted coelioscopy
lymphadenectomy; hysterectomy; nerve sparing; enlarged trachelectomy; omentectomy; appendicectomy; pelvectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* patient with cervical cancer depending on enlarged colpo-hysterectomy ± pelvic lymphadenectomy or a surgery after concomitant radiochemotherapy, or lombo aortic lymphadenectomy for a locally advanced cancer, or a restadification
* patient with cervical cancer depending on a restadification
* patient aged over 18 years
* previous antitumor treatment allowed but necessarily disrupted 20 days before inclusion
* WHO score equal or inferior to 3
* cirrhosis-related Child-Pugh score under or equal to A7 are allowed
* life expectancy equal or superior to 12 weeks
* patient affiliated to health insurance
* dated and signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnant or breastfeeding woman
* patient unable to proceed follow-up visit, because of geographic, social or mental reasons
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CRG : Groupe Francophone de Chirurgie Robotique en Gynécologie
UNKNOWN
National Cancer Institute, France
OTHER_GOV
Centre Oscar Lambret
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fabrice NARDUCCI, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
Eric LAMBAUDIE, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Bordeaux, Hôpital Saint-André
Bordeaux, , France
Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine
Bordeaux, , France
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, , France
CHRU Lille, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandres
Lille, , France
CHU Limoges
Limoges, , France
Institut Paoli Calmette
Marseille, , France
CHU Nîmes
Nîmes, , France
Polyclinique KenVal
Nîmes, , France
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
Paris, , France
Polyclinique Courlancy
Reims, , France
Centre hospitalier de Roubaix
Roubaix, , France
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Site René Gauducheau
Saint-Herblain, , France
Institut Claudius Regaud
Toulouse, , France
CHU Rangueil
Toulouse, , France
CHRU de Tours
Tours, , France
Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes
Valenciennes, , France
Centre Alexis Vautrin
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Narducci F, Bogart E, Hebert T, Gauthier T, Collinet P, Classe JM, Lecuru F, Delest A, Motton S, Conri V, Ferrer C, Marchal F, Ferron G, Probst A, Thery J, Le Deley MC, Lefebvre D, Francon D, Leblanc E, Lambaudie E. Severe perioperative morbidity after robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: Results of the randomized ROBOGYN-1004 trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Aug;158(2):382-389. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 May 25.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010-A00605-34
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ROBOGYN - 1004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.