Perioperative Morbidity in Gyneco-oncology According to the Procedure : Coelioscopy Versus Robot-assisted Coelioscopy

NCT ID: NCT01247779

Last Updated: 2019-03-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

386 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-12-31

Study Completion Date

2017-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare perioperative morbidity of coelioscopy versus robot-assisted coelioscopy in cervical cancer, uterus cancer and ovarian cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Laparoscopic surgery, also called minimally invasive surgery (MIS), is a surgical method less invasive than classical laparoscopic open procedure. Particularly, MIS is used for resection of some gynecological cancer such as endometrial cancer, cervical cancer or ovarian cancer. Several studies demonstrated that MIS induce less surgical complications (bleeding, infections, post-operative pains...), shorter hospitalization time, earlier recovery of activity and better quality of life than laparoscopic open procedure.

However, MIS is the selected method in only 9 to 25 % of gynecologic cancer surgery in France. This is likely due to the longer learning curve of MIS compared to laparoscopic open procedure.

In 2001 the FDA allowed the use of robot assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS). This technique adds some advantage to laparoscopic surgery. Indeed, surgeon operates with better precision while seated comfortably at a computer console viewing a 3-D image of the surgical field. Moreover learning curve of RALS is shorter than MIS. Comparative studies between RALS and MIS demonstrate an equivalence of these techniques for operation length and bleeding. However for surgery linked complications and time for recovery of activity, RALS had better results than MIS.

Despite its expensive cost, RALS is now commonly used in North America (90% of prostatectomy and 40% of cancer linked hysterectomy). However RALS need to be evaluated in a randomized clinical trial before it's acceptation in gyneco-oncology in France.

Thus, the purpose of the ROBOGYN clinical trial is to compare clinical benefit of RALS and MIS in a randomized study for patients with cancer of cervix, uterus or ovary.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Cancer Uterus Cancer Ovarian Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard Coelioscopy

gynecologic surgery - standard coelioscopy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

gynecologic surgery - standard coelioscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

lymphadenectomy; hysterectomy; nerve sparing; enlarged trachelectomy; omentectomy; appendicectomy; pelvectomy

Robot-assisted coelioscopy

gynecologic surgery - robot assisted coelioscopy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

gynecologic surgery - robot assisted coelioscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

lymphadenectomy; hysterectomy; nerve sparing; enlarged trachelectomy; omentectomy; appendicectomy; pelvectomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

gynecologic surgery - standard coelioscopy

lymphadenectomy; hysterectomy; nerve sparing; enlarged trachelectomy; omentectomy; appendicectomy; pelvectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

gynecologic surgery - robot assisted coelioscopy

lymphadenectomy; hysterectomy; nerve sparing; enlarged trachelectomy; omentectomy; appendicectomy; pelvectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patient with uterus cancer depending on hysterectomy ± pelvic lymphadenectomy or a restadification
* patient with cervical cancer depending on enlarged colpo-hysterectomy ± pelvic lymphadenectomy or a surgery after concomitant radiochemotherapy, or lombo aortic lymphadenectomy for a locally advanced cancer, or a restadification
* patient with cervical cancer depending on a restadification
* patient aged over 18 years
* previous antitumor treatment allowed but necessarily disrupted 20 days before inclusion
* WHO score equal or inferior to 3
* cirrhosis-related Child-Pugh score under or equal to A7 are allowed
* life expectancy equal or superior to 12 weeks
* patient affiliated to health insurance
* dated and signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* metastatic disease
* pregnant or breastfeeding woman
* patient unable to proceed follow-up visit, because of geographic, social or mental reasons
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

CRG : Groupe Francophone de Chirurgie Robotique en Gynécologie

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Cancer Institute, France

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Oscar Lambret

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fabrice NARDUCCI, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille

Eric LAMBAUDIE, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Bordeaux, Hôpital Saint-André

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Centre Oscar Lambret

Lille, , France

Site Status

CHRU Lille, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandres

Lille, , France

Site Status

CHU Limoges

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Institut Paoli Calmette

Marseille, , France

Site Status

CHU Nîmes

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

Polyclinique KenVal

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou

Paris, , France

Site Status

Polyclinique Courlancy

Reims, , France

Site Status

Centre hospitalier de Roubaix

Roubaix, , France

Site Status

Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Site René Gauducheau

Saint-Herblain, , France

Site Status

Institut Claudius Regaud

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

CHU Rangueil

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

CHRU de Tours

Tours, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes

Valenciennes, , France

Site Status

Centre Alexis Vautrin

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Narducci F, Bogart E, Hebert T, Gauthier T, Collinet P, Classe JM, Lecuru F, Delest A, Motton S, Conri V, Ferrer C, Marchal F, Ferron G, Probst A, Thery J, Le Deley MC, Lefebvre D, Francon D, Leblanc E, Lambaudie E. Severe perioperative morbidity after robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: Results of the randomized ROBOGYN-1004 trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Aug;158(2):382-389. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 May 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32467054 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-A00605-34

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ROBOGYN - 1004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Optical Biopsy and Fallopian Tube
NCT02365779 COMPLETED NA