Ultrasound Guided Spinal Anesthesia in Non Obese Obstetric Patients

NCT ID: NCT01440400

Last Updated: 2013-03-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-10-31

Study Completion Date

2012-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The classical method for spinal anesthesia relies on the use of bony landmarks to identify the level and point of entry of the spinal needle. Over the years, in experienced hands, this method consistently proved to be successful and safe.

The introduction of ultrasound to guide neuraxial anaesthesia into clinical practice was relatively slow compared to peripheral nerve blocks or central venous catheterization. This could be due to the technical difficulties posed by the bony structures surrounding the spinal cord and its dura that blocks the path of the ultrasound beam. Many anesthetists are reluctant to change their conventional landmark technique, particularly with most studies showing no change in the success rate between ultrasound guided and the landmark techniques.

Several studies however showed that the ultrasound guided approach reduces the number of attempts to achieve a successful block and reduces the procedure time particularly in obese patients and those with technical difficulties.

In this study the investigators are trying to answer the following question : Is there any advantage in using ultrasound to guide spinal anaesthesia in non obese obstetric patients with easily palpable bony landmarks?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients will be randomized using a web based randomization program into two groups: Ultrasound guided spinal anesthesia (US) \& conventional spinal anesthesia (C). In both groups, the level of the third or fourth lumbar inter-space (L3/4 or L4/5) will be identified using either ultrasound (transverse and longitudinal approach) or palpation method using anatomical landmarks.

All ultrasound examinations and spinal anesthesia will be performed by 3 anesthetists with experience in ultrasound guided neuraxial block (between 100 and 200 cases). The ultrasound examination will be done using Logiq e TM ultrasound machine (GE Solingen Germany) with 4C RS 2 - 5.5MHz Broadband multi-frequency probe.

The predetermined point of entry for the introducer needle will be marked on the patient's back. The spinal anaesthesia will be administered with the patient in the sitting position, using a 26 gauge pencil point needle (PortexTM) with 15 mg of heavy Bupivacaine and 20 micrograms of Fentanyl. An independent observer, who is blinded to the method used to identify the point of entry of the introducer needle, will be collecting the data.The spinal anesthesia will be labeled as successful if a bilateral block to the sixth thoracic dermatome (T6) , judged by loss of cold and touch discrimination, is established 5 minutes after the spinal injection.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cesarean Section

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional spinal anesthesia

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Ultrasound guided spinal anesthesia

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound guided spinal anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Using the ultrasound to identify the spinal puncture level, mid-line and the depth of the dura.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound guided spinal anesthesia

Using the ultrasound to identify the spinal puncture level, mid-line and the depth of the dura.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All mothers with body mass index (BMI) equal to or less than 35 who has normal singleton pregnancy
* At 37 weeks gestation or more
* Admitted to Corniche Hospital for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with BMI \>35
* Patieints with difficult anatomical landmarks
* Patients with neurological disease or coagulation defects
* Patients receiving anticoagulants
* Patients refusing spinal anaesthesia
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Corniche Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Tarek Ansari

Consultant anesthetist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tarek Ansari, FFARCSI

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Corniche Hospital

Mounir Fayez, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Corniche Hospital

Amr Maher, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Corniche Hospital

Ahmed El Gamassy, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Corniche Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Corniche hospital

Abu Dhabi, , United Arab Emirates

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Arab Emirates

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ch3151105

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Regional Anesthesia
NCT04933500 COMPLETED