Comparison of Successful Spinal Needle Insertion Between Obese and Non-obese Pregnant Women
NCT ID: NCT03054233
Last Updated: 2017-02-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
136 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pendant Position and Traditional Sitting Position for Successful Spinal Puncture in Spinal Anaesthesia
NCT02753660
Conventional Palpation Versus Ultrasound Assisted Spinal Anesthesia in Obstetrics
NCT05846100
Utility of Ultrasound in Identification of Midline and Placement of Epidural in Severely Obese Parturients
NCT03100968
Does Ultrasound Increase the First-pass Success of Epidural Space Identification in Obese Parturients
NCT04352283
Fractionated Vs Single Dose Injection for Spinal C-Section in Patients With Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension
NCT03693638
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Obese
Obese pregnant women received spinal anesthesia using Quincke Needle 25G/27G in crossed leg sitting position for caesarean section
Crossed leg sitting position
Spinal anesthesia done in crossed leg sitting position
Non-obese
Non-obese pregnant women received spinal anesthesia using Quincke Needle 25G/27G in crossed leg sitting position for caesarean section
Crossed leg sitting position
Spinal anesthesia done in crossed leg sitting position
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Crossed leg sitting position
Spinal anesthesia done in crossed leg sitting position
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects have been explained about the study, have agreed to enroll and have signed the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects with fetal's head trapped, umbilical prolapse, and foot presentation
* Subjects with pre-eclampsia
* Subjects with cardiovascular diseases
* Subjects with scoliosis
* Subjects with recent lumbal surgery history
* Subjects who cannot sit in crossed leg sitting position.
Drop out criteria:
* Subjects with worsening conditions before spinal anesthesia
* Subjects with failed spinal needle insertion and thus received general anesthesia
* Subjects with twin pregnancy
* Subjects drop out the study.
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indonesia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Susilo Chandra
Anesthesiologist Consultant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Susilo Chandra
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indonesia University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cipto Mangunkusumo Central National Hospital
Central Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
Cipto Mangunkusumo Cental National Hospital
Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Davies GA, Maxwell C, McLeod L, Gagnon R, Basso M, Bos H, Delisle MF, Farine D, Hudon L, Menticoglou S, Mundle W, Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Ouellet A, Pressey T, Roggensack A, Leduc D, Ballerman C, Biringer A, Duperron L, Jones D, Lee LS, Shepherd D, Wilson K; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Obesity in pregnancy. No. 239, February 2010. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Aug;110(2):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.03.008.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion no. 549: obesity in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):213-7. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000425667.10377.60.
Rodrigues FR, Brandao MJ. Regional anesthesia for cesarean section in obese pregnant women: a retrospective study. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;61(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(11)70002-2.
Soltani Mohammadi S, Hassani M, Marashi SM. Comparing the squatting position and traditional sitting position for ease of spinal needle placement: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Apr 5;4(2):e13969. doi: 10.5812/aapm.13969. eCollection 2014 May.
Watanabe S, Kobara K, Ishida H, Eguchi A. Influence of trunk muscle co-contraction on spinal curvature during sitting cross-legged. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr-Jun;50(3-4):187-92.
Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP, Wadsworth J, Joffe M, Beard RW, Regan L, Robinson S. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001 Aug;25(8):1175-82. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801670.
Mhyre JM. Anesthetic management for the morbidly obese pregnant woman. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2007 Winter;45(1):51-70. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e31802b8a90. No abstract available.
Vricella LK, Louis JM, Mercer BM, Bolden N. Anesthesia complications during scheduled cesarean delivery for morbidly obese women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):276.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.022. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie R, Wilson DJ, Gawne-Cain M, Russell R. Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia. 2000 Nov;55(11):1122-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01547-4.x.
Gulay U, Meltem T, Nadir SS, Aysin A. Ultrasound-guided evaluation of the lumbar subarachnoid space in lateral and sitting positions in pregnant patients to receive elective cesarean operation. Pak J Med Sci. 2015 Jan-Feb;31(1):76-81. doi: 10.12669/pjms.311.5647.
Kim SH, Kim DY, Han JI, Baik HJ, Park HS, Lee GY, Kim JH. Vertebral level of Tuffier's line measured by ultrasonography in parturients in the lateral decubitus position. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Sep;67(3):181-5. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.3.181. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
Reinius H, Jonsson L, Gustafsson S, Sundbom M, Duvernoy O, Pelosi P, Hedenstierna G, Freden F. Prevention of atelectasis in morbidly obese patients during general anesthesia and paralysis: a computerized tomography study. Anesthesiology. 2009 Nov;111(5):979-87. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b87edb.
Collins JS, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Brock-Utne JG, Levitan RM. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the "sniff" and "ramped" positions. Obes Surg. 2004 Oct;14(9):1171-5. doi: 10.1381/0960892042386869.
Cadi P, Guenoun T, Journois D, Chevallier JM, Diehl JL, Safran D. Pressure-controlled ventilation improves oxygenation during laparoscopic obesity surgery compared with volume-controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2008 May;100(5):709-16. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen067.
McKay RE, Malhotra A, Cakmakkaya OS, Hall KT, McKay WR, Apfel CC. Effect of increased body mass index and anaesthetic duration on recovery of protective airway reflexes after sevoflurane vs desflurane. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):175-82. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep374. Epub 2009 Dec 26.
Anuurad E, Shiwaku K, Nogi A, Kitajima K, Enkhmaa B, Shimono K, Yamane Y. The new BMI criteria for asians by the regional office for the western pacific region of WHO are suitable for screening of overweight to prevent metabolic syndrome in elder Japanese workers. J Occup Health. 2003 Nov;45(6):335-43. doi: 10.1539/joh.45.335.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IndonesiaUAnes010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.