Does Ultrasound of the Spine Improve Labor Epidurals/Spinal Anesthesia in Obstetric Patients?

NCT ID: NCT01243216

Last Updated: 2016-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators are interested in determining the utility of ultrasound of the spine for labor epidurals or spinal anesthesia for women in labor or having a cesarean delivery. The investigators hypothesized that in women with poor spinal landmarks that the use of ultrasound of the spine will improve the process of placing labor epidurals or spinal anesthetics

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Ultrasound has been in use for peripheral regional anesthesia for several years and is becoming more common. It is currently routinely used here at the University of Missouri. Ultrasound for neuraxial anesthesia, however, is less common and is only being done in a few centers.. There have been several case reports of its use in obstetric anesthesia for patients with prior spinal surgery or spinal deformity. There have been even few prospective randomized studies. While its use may have significant advantages, it is not yet clear what those advantages are and in whom it may be most beneficial. The investigators seek to answer the following questions regarding the use of preprocedure ultrasound for neuraxial analgesia/anesthesia in obstetric patients:

* Are there benefits to the use of pre procedure ultrasound for neuraxial analgesia/anesthesia?
* If so, what are the benefits?
* If measurable, to what extent does the patient benefit?
* Do all patients benefit or only a specific subgroup?
* Is there a "cost" to the use of pre procedure ultrasound, i.e. extra time needed to perform the ultrasound exam vs a "savings" with the use of pre procedure ultrasound, i.e., less time to perform the epidural analgesic or spinal anesthetic as a direct result of the use of ultrasound?
* In particular the investigators hypothesize that in patients whose spinal landmarks are not palpable or are barely palpable, ultrasound will be found to be beneficial as determined by metrics described below (see item #6). In patients whose landmarks are prominent or easily palpable pre procedure ultrasound will not be of significant benefit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pregnancy Labor Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ultrasound Group

Patients in the Ultrasound Group will have a pre-procedure ultrasound of the spine prior to needle placement

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ultrasound examination of the lumbar spine. The level of the lumbar interspace will be determined by the oblique/sagittal method. The transverse method will be used to determine the best lumbar interspace and the distance from the skin to the target (epidural space or intrathecal space)

No Ultrasound Group

Patients in the No Ultrasound Group will not have a pre-procedure ultrasound of the spine performed prior to needle placement.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound

Ultrasound examination of the lumbar spine. The level of the lumbar interspace will be determined by the oblique/sagittal method. The transverse method will be used to determine the best lumbar interspace and the distance from the skin to the target (epidural space or intrathecal space)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women in labor
* Women scheduled for cesarean delivery

Exclusion Criteria

* Under age 18
* Emergency cesarean deliveries
* Unable to cooperate with ultrasound examination or regional anesthesia
* Advanced labor
* Contraindications to regional anesthesia
* Unable to understand the consent process
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Missouri-Columbia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven T Fogel, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Women's and Children's Hospital

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Carvalho JC. Ultrasound-facilitated epidurals and spinals in obstetrics. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008 Mar;26(1):145-58, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2007.11.007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18319185 (View on PubMed)

Arzola C, Davies S, Rofaeel A, Carvalho JC. Ultrasound using the transverse approach to the lumbar spine provides reliable landmarks for labor epidurals. Anesth Analg. 2007 May;104(5):1188-92, tables of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000250912.66057.41.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17456672 (View on PubMed)

Chin KJ, Perlas A, Singh M, Arzola C, Prasad A, Chan V, Brull R. An ultrasound-assisted approach facilitates spinal anesthesia for total joint arthroplasty. Can J Anaesth. 2009 Sep;56(9):643-50. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9132-8. Epub 2009 Jun 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19548051 (View on PubMed)

Grau T, Bartusseck E, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging improves learning curves in obstetric epidural anesthesia: a preliminary study. Can J Anaesth. 2003 Dec;50(10):1047-50. doi: 10.1007/BF03018371.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14656785 (View on PubMed)

Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E. Ultrasound control for presumed difficult epidural puncture. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Jul;45(6):766-71. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045006766.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11421838 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1167437

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Epidural Analgesia on Electrophysiological Function
NCT02334150 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Previous Cesarean Sections
NCT03024632 WITHDRAWN