Method Comparison and Clinical Specificity Study: Evaluation of the Infinium HD Cytogenetic Abnormality Test
NCT ID: NCT01426308
Last Updated: 2016-04-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
900 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-08-31
2011-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* The primary objective of the study is to assess the performance of the Infinium HD Test using banked DNA samples extracted from whole blood patient samples derived from the intended use population.
* The secondary objective of the study is to determine the background number of chromosomal abnormalities per person in the general population based on the resolution of the Infinium HD Test.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prenatal Cell-free DNA Screening in Pregnancies With Diverse Genetic Risk Profiles Utilizing Targeted and Whole-exome Sequencing
NCT07106853
The Clinical Study of Sex Chromosome Variants
NCT01661010
Investigating the Feasibility and Implementation of Whole Genome Sequencing in Patients With Suspected Genetic Disorder
NCT03829176
Identifai Genetics Analytic Validity Study - Compound Heterozygosity and Samples Collection
NCT06239077
Incidental Genomics
NCT03597165
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Method Comparison Group
The method comparison group will consist of de-identified, leftover DNA samples from patients referred for post-natal cytogenetic testing.
No interventions assigned to this group
Clinical Specificity Group
The clinical specificity group will consist of de-identified, leftover DNA samples from non-phenotypic patients, or patients not referred for post-natal cytogenetic testing.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Sample is from a patient referred for post-natal cytogenetic testing.
2. Sample gender is known.
3. Sample quantity available for testing is ≥ 1 microgram of genomic DNA at a concentration of 60-80 nanograms per microliter (60-80ng/µl).
4. Sample is extracted genomic DNA from EDTA or heparin-anticoagulated whole blood.
5. Sample has been stored at 2 to 8°C or -15 to -25°C for no greater than three years from the date of extraction.
6. Sample has been tested by a reference method. Acceptable reference methods include karyotype, FISH, qPCR, MLPA, and methylation analysis.
The following are criteria for inclusion of extracted genomic DNA samples in the clinical specificity sample pool:
1. Sample gender is known.
2. Sample is from a patient not referred for post-natal cytogenetic testing.
3. Sample quantity available for testing is ≥ 1 microgram of genomic DNA at a concentration of at least 60-80 nanograms per microliter (60-80ng/µl).
4. Sample is extracted genomic DNA from EDTA or heparin-anticoagulated whole blood.
5. Sample has been stored at 2 to 8°C or -15 to -25°C for no greater than three years from the date of extraction.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Sample is from a patient referred for cytogenetic oncology testing.
3. Sample quantity \< 1 microgram of genomic DNA or less than 60 nanograms per microliter (60ng/µl).
4. Sample was improperly stored or was extracted from a sample that was improperly stored.
5. Sample was tested by an Illumina array during standard of care testing.
1. Sample is from a patient referred for post-natal cytogenetic testing.
2. Sample quantity \< 1 microgram of genomic DNA or less than 60 nanograms per microliter (60ng/µl).
3. Sample was improperly stored or was extracted from a sample that was improperly stored.
1 Minute
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Illumina, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
ARUP Laboratories
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Cyto-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.