A Two-Part Study of Sativex® Oromucosal Spray for Relieving Uncontrolled Persistent Pain in Patients With Advanced Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01424566

Last Updated: 2023-04-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

406 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-29

Study Completion Date

2015-12-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of nabiximols (Sativex®), compared with placebo, when used as an adjunctive measure in relieving uncontrolled persistent chronic pain (not breakthrough pain) in participants with advanced cancer, who had inadequate analgesia even with optimized chronic opioid therapy.

This multi-center study was conducted in two parts. All participants enrolled into the trial received nabiximols during one of two parts of the study, but they did not know which part.

Eligible participants were not required to stop any of their current treatments or medications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This 11-week, multi-center, placebo-controlled study aimed to determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of nabiximols administered as an adjunctive treatment for 5 weeks, versus placebo, assessed by a 2-part, randomized withdrawal design. The first part of the study (Part A) was single-blind (participants) and the second part of the study (Part B) was randomized, double-blind. Eligible participants had advanced cancer, with a clinical diagnosis of cancer related pain which was not wholly alleviated by their current optimized opioid treatment.

Qualifying participants entered the study at screening and commenced a 5- to 14-day eligibility period. During this period, eligible participants had 3 consecutive days where pain severity remained within defined parameters, break-through opioid usage had not exceeded an average of 4 episodes per day, and maintenance opioid medication and dose had not changed. Eligible participants underwent nabiximols titration during a single-blind treatment period lasting 10 days, followed by 4 days of therapy at the titrated dose. Participants who demonstrated an improvement of 15% or more on the score of the pain numerical rating scale were advanced to Part B, where they were randomized 1:1 to nabiximols or placebo in a double-blind fashion. Participants then received study treatments at their self-titrated doses for 5 weeks. After the end of the 5-week treatment period, participants were offered the option of entering an open-label extension (OLE) study; participants who entered the OLE up to 7 days after study completion had their follow-up assessments performed on the same day as their first OLE study visit. Participants that did not enter the OLE study had a safety follow up visit 14 days after treatment completion, which could be via telephone.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Advanced Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nabiximols

Nabiximols was self-administered by participants as a 100 microliter (μL) oromucosal spray in the morning and evening, up to a maximum of 10 sprays per day for 2 or 7 weeks. Nabiximols oromucosal spray contained delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (27 milligrams \[mg\]/milliliter \[mL\]):cannabidiol (CBD) (25 mg/mL), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%)flavoring. Each 100 μL actuation delivered 2.7 mg THC and 2.5 mg CBD.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nabiximols

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo (GA-0034)

Placebo was self-administered by participants as a 100 μL oromucosal spray in the morning and evening, up to a maximum of 10 sprays per day for 5 weeks. Placebo oromucosal spray contained ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavoring and colorings.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo (GA-0034)

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nabiximols

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo (GA-0034)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Sativex®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The participant had advanced cancer for which there is no known curative therapy
* The participant had a clinical diagnosis of cancer related pain, which was not alleviated with their current optimized opioid treatment
* The participant received an optimized maintenance dose of Step 3 opioid therapy, preferably with a sustained release preparation, but also allowing a regular maintenance dose of around the clock use of immediate release preparations
* The participant received a daily maintenance dose Step 3 opioid therapy of less than or equal to a total daily opioid dose of 500 mg/day of morphine equivalence (including maintenance and break-through opioids)
* The participant was using no more than one type of break-through opioid analgesia

Exclusion Criteria

* Had any planned clinical interventions that would have affected their pain (for example, chemotherapy or radiation therapy where, in the clinical judgment of the investigator, these would be expected to affect pain)
* The participant was currently using or had used cannabis or cannabinoid-based medications within 30 days of study entry and was unwilling to abstain for the duration of the study
* Had experienced myocardial infarction or clinically significant cardiac dysfunction within the last 12 months or had a cardiac disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator would have put the participant at risk of a clinically significant arrhythmia or myocardial infarction
* Had significantly impaired renal function
* Had significantly impaired hepatic function
* Female participants of child-bearing potential and male participants whose partner was of child-bearing potential, unless willing to ensure that they or their partner used effective contraception, for example, oral contraception, double barrier, intra-uterine device, during the study and for three months thereafter (however, a male condom was not to be used in conjunction with a female condom as this may not have proven effective)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jazz Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

East Melbourne, , Australia

Site Status

Parkville, , Australia

Site Status

Shumen, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Vratsa, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Lünen, , Germany

Site Status

Stadtroda, , Germany

Site Status

Wetzlar, , Germany

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Deszk, , Hungary

Site Status

Komárom, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Szikszó, , Hungary

Site Status

Bangalore, , India

Site Status

Jaipur, , India

Site Status

Pune, , India

Site Status

Ashkelon, , Israel

Site Status

Beersheba, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Ẕerifin, , Israel

Site Status

Garbagnate Milanese, , Italy

Site Status

Piacenza, , Italy

Site Status

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Klaipėda, , Lithuania

Site Status

Šiauliai, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Czeladź, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Gliwice, , Poland

Site Status

Kłodzko, , Poland

Site Status

Opole, , Poland

Site Status

Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Włocławek, , Poland

Site Status

Alba Iulia, , Romania

Site Status

Baia Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Brăila, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Focşani, , Romania

Site Status

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Satu Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Sibiu, , Romania

Site Status

Suceava, , Romania

Site Status

Cadiz, , Spain

Site Status

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Changhua, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Bury St Edmunds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Norwich, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia Bulgaria Germany Hungary India Israel Italy Lithuania Poland Romania Spain Taiwan United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fallon MT, Albert Lux E, McQuade R, Rossetti S, Sanchez R, Sun W, Wright S, Lichtman AH, Kornyeyeva E. Sativex oromucosal spray as adjunctive therapy in advanced cancer patients with chronic pain unalleviated by optimized opioid therapy: two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies. Br J Pain. 2017 Aug;11(3):119-133. doi: 10.1177/2049463717710042. Epub 2017 May 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28785408 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-022905-17

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

GWCA1103

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.