Sativex® for Relieving Persistent Pain in Patients With Advanced Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01361607
Last Updated: 2023-04-12
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
399 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-05-27
2014-11-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Eligible participants were not required to stop any of their current treatments or medications.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sativex® for Relieving Persistent Pain in Participants With Advanced Cancer
NCT01262651
Long Term Safety of Sativex Oromucosal Spray (Sativex®; Nabiximols) as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Persistent Chronic Cancer Related Pain
NCT01337089
A Two-Part Study of Sativex® Oromucosal Spray for Relieving Uncontrolled Persistent Pain in Patients With Advanced Cancer
NCT01424566
A Study of Sativex® for Pain Relief in Patients With Advanced Malignancy.
NCT00530764
Treatment for Chronic Pain in Patients With Advanced Cancer
NCT00003687
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Qualifying participants entered the study at screening and commenced a 5 to 14 day eligibility period. During this period, eligible participants had 3 consecutive days where pain severity remained within defined parameters, break-through opioid usage had not exceeded an average of 4 episodes per day, and maintenance opioid medication and dose had not changed. Eligible participants returned for randomization on Day 1 and were randomized to either the nabiximols or placebo treatment arm using a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants began an initial titration period that lasted up to 14 days. The titration schedule required dosing to a minimum of 3 sprays per day, after which participants were allowed to individualize their dose (3 to 10 sprays per day) until Day 14 when that dose was then fixed for the remainder of the study. Participants returned at Day 22 and Day 36 (end of the randomized treatment period), or earlier if they terminated prematurely from the study. After the end of the 5-week treatment period, participants were offered the option of entering an open-label extension (OLE) study; a safety follow up visit (up to Day 43) was not required if the participant entered the OLE on Day 36. Participants who entered the OLE, up to 7 days after study completion had their follow-up assessments performed on the same day as their first OLE study visit. Participants that did not enter the OLE study had a safety follow up visit 14 days after treatment completion, which could be via telephone.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Nabiximols
Nabiximols was self-administered by participants as a 100 microliter (μL) oromucosal spray in the morning and evening, up to a maximum of 10 sprays per day for 5 weeks. Nabiximols oromucosal spray contained delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (27 milligram \[mg\]/milliliter \[mL\]):cannabidiol (CBD) (25 mg/mL), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavoring. Each 100 μL actuation delivered 2.7 mg THC and 2.5 mg CBD.
Nabiximols
Placebo (GA-0034)
Placebo was self-administered by participants as a 100 μL oromucosal spray in the morning and evening, up to a maximum of 10 sprays per day for 5 weeks. Placebo oromucosal spray contained ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavoring and colorings.
Placebo (GA-0034)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nabiximols
Placebo (GA-0034)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The participant had a clinical diagnosis of cancer related pain, which was not wholly alleviated with their current optimized opioid treatment
* The participant received an optimized maintenance dose of Step 3 opioid therapy, preferably with a sustained release preparation, but also allowing a regular maintenance dose of around-the-clock use of immediate release preparations
* The participant received a daily maintenance dose Step 3 opioid therapy of less than or equal to a total daily opioid dose of 500 mg/day of morphine equivalence (including maintenance and break-through opioids)
* The participant was using no more than one type of break-through opioid analgesia
Exclusion Criteria
* The participant was using or had used cannabis or cannabinoid-based medications within 30 days of study entry and is unwilling to abstain for the duration of the study
* The participant had experienced myocardial infarction or clinically significant cardiac dysfunction within the last 12 months or had a cardiac disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, would have put the participant at risk of a clinically significant arrhythmia or myocardial infarction
* The participant had significantly impaired renal function
* The participant had significantly impaired hepatic function
* Female participants of child-bearing potential and male participants whose partner was of child-bearing potential, unless willing to ensure that they or their partner used effective contraception, for example, oral contraception, double barrier, intra-uterine device, during the study and for 3 months thereafter (however, a male condom was not to be used in conjunction with a female condom as this may not have proven effective)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Glendale, California, United States
Santa Rosa, California, United States
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Holiday, Florida, United States
Miami, Florida, United States
Stuart, Florida, United States
Marietta, Georgia, United States
Newnan, Georgia, United States
Stockbridge, Georgia, United States
Gurnee, Illinois, United States
Mount Vernon, Illinois, United States
Ashland, Kentucky, United States
Bossier City, Louisiana, United States
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Missoula, Montana, United States
Berlin, New Jersey, United States
New York, New York, United States
New York, New York, United States
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Lacey, Washington, United States
Vratsa, , Bulgaria
Benešov, , Czechia
České Budějovice, , Czechia
České Budějovice, , Czechia
Jablonec nad Nisou, , Czechia
Pilsen, , Czechia
Sokolov, , Czechia
Teplice, , Czechia
Berlin, , Germany
Frankfurt, , Germany
Fulda, , Germany
Hanover, , Germany
Jena, , Germany
Wiesbaden, , Germany
Komárom, , Hungary
Nyíregyháza, , Hungary
Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
Chihuahua City, , Mexico
Monterrey, , Mexico
Bydgoszcz, , Poland
Częstochowa, , Poland
Częstochowa, , Poland
Działdowo, , Poland
Gdansk, , Poland
Kłodzko, , Poland
Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, , Poland
Poznan, , Poland
Warsaw, , Poland
Ponce, , Puerto Rico
Târgovişte, Dâmbovița County, Romania
Baia Mare, , Romania
Brasov, , Romania
Brăila, , Romania
Bucharest, , Romania
Cluj-Napoca, , Romania
Constanța, , Romania
Focşani, , Romania
Iași, , Romania
Sibiu, , Romania
Suceava, , Romania
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom
Withington, Manchester, United Kingdom
Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, United Kingdom
Coventry, , United Kingdom
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Norwich, , United Kingdom
Plymouth, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fallon MT, Albert Lux E, McQuade R, Rossetti S, Sanchez R, Sun W, Wright S, Lichtman AH, Kornyeyeva E. Sativex oromucosal spray as adjunctive therapy in advanced cancer patients with chronic pain unalleviated by optimized opioid therapy: two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies. Br J Pain. 2017 Aug;11(3):119-133. doi: 10.1177/2049463717710042. Epub 2017 May 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009-016065-29
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GWCA0962
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.