Sativex® for Relieving Persistent Pain in Participants With Advanced Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01262651

Last Updated: 2018-04-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

397 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-11-25

Study Completion Date

2015-07-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This 9-week study aimed to determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of nabiximols (Sativex®) as an adjunctive treatment, compared with placebo in relieving uncontrolled persistent chronic pain in participants with advanced cancer.

Eligible participants were not required to stop any of their current treatments or medications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This 9-week, multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study aimed to determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of nabiximols, administered as an adjunctive treatment for 5 weeks, versus placebo. Eligible participants had advanced cancer, with a clinical diagnosis of cancer related pain which was not wholly alleviated by their current optimized opioid treatment.

Qualifying participants entered the study at screening and commenced a 5 to 14 day eligibility period. During this period, eligible participants had 3 consecutive days where pain severity remained within defined parameters, break-through opioid usage had not exceeded an average of 4 episodes per day, and maintenance opioid medication and dose had not changed. Eligible participants returned for randomization on Day 1 and were randomized to either the nabiximols or placebo treatment arm using a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants began an initial titration period that lasted up to 14 days. The titration schedule required dosing to a minimum of 3 sprays per day, after which participants were allowed to individualize their dose (3 to 10 sprays per day) until Day 14 when that dose was then fixed for the remainder of the study. Participants returned at Day 22 and Day 36 (end of the randomized treatment period), or earlier if they terminated prematurely from the study. After the end of the 5-week treatment period, participants were offered the option of entering an open-label extension (OLE) study; a safety follow up visit (up to Day 43) was not required if the participant entered the OLE on Day 36. Participants who entered the OLE, up to 7 days after study completion had their follow-up assessments performed on the same day as their first OLE study visit. Participants that did not enter the OLE study had a safety follow up visit 14 days after treatment completion, which could be via telephone.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Advanced Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nabiximols

Nabiximols was self-administered by participants as a 100 microliter (μL) oromucosal spray in the morning and evening, up to a maximum of 10 sprays per day for 5 weeks. Nabiximols oromucosal spray contained delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (27 milligram \[mg\]/milliliter \[mL\]):cannabidiol (CBD) (25 mg/mL), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavoring. Each 100 μL actuation delivered 2.7 mg THC and 2.5 mg CBD.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nabiximols

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo (GA-0034)

Placebo Comparator: Placebo (GA-0034) Placebo was self-administered by participants as a 100 μL oromucosal spray in the morning and evening, up to a maximum of 10 sprays per day for 5 weeks. Placebo oromucosal spray contained ethanol: propylene glycol (50:50)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo (GA-0034)

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nabiximols

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo (GA-0034)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Sativex®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The participant had advanced cancer for which there was no known curative therapy
* The participant had a clinical diagnosis of cancer related pain, which was not wholly alleviated with their current optimized opioid treatment
* The participant received an optimized maintenance dose of Step 3 opioid therapy, preferably with a sustained release preparation, but also allowing a regular maintenance dose of around the clock use of immediate release preparations
* The participant received a daily maintenance dose Step 3 opioid therapy of less than or equal to a total daily opioid dose of 500 mg/day of morphine equivalence (including maintenance and break-through opioids)
* The participant was using no more than one type of break-through opioid analgesia

Exclusion Criteria

* The participant had any planned clinical interventions that would have affected their pain (for example, chemotherapy or radiation therapy where, in the clinical judgment of the investigator, these would be expected to affect pain)
* The participant was using or had used cannabis or cannabinoid-based medications within 30 days of study entry and is unwilling to abstain for the duration of the study
* The participant had experienced myocardial infarction or clinically significant cardiac dysfunction within the last 12 months or had a cardiac disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, would have put the participant at risk of a clinically significant arrhythmia or myocardial infarction
* The participant had significantly impaired renal function
* The participant had significantly impaired hepatic function
* Female participants of child-bearing potential and male participants whose partner was of child-bearing potential, unless willing to ensure that they or their partner used effective contraception, for example, oral contraception, double barrier, intra-uterine device, during the study and for 3 months thereafter (however, a male condom was not to be used in conjunction with a female condom as this may not have proven effective)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

GW Pharmaceuticals Ltd

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

El Cajon, California, United States

Site Status

Gilroy, California, United States

Site Status

Brandon, Florida, United States

Site Status

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Holiday, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lynn Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

Stuart, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Newnan, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Stockbridge, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Berlin, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Hendersonville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Laredo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Gabrovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Shumen, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

České Budějovice, , Czechia

Site Status

České Budějovice, , Czechia

Site Status

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Most, , Czechia

Site Status

Nová Ves pod Pleší, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava-Poruba, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Lünen, , Germany

Site Status

Stadtroda, , Germany

Site Status

Wetzlar, , Germany

Site Status

Deszk, , Hungary

Site Status

Kecskemét, , Hungary

Site Status

Komárom, , Hungary

Site Status

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Rēzekne, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Klaipėda, , Lithuania

Site Status

Šiauliai, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Bielsko-Biala, , Poland

Site Status

Gliwice, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Ponce, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Baia Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Brăila, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Satu Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Suceava, , Romania

Site Status

Bury, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bury St Edmunds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Norwich, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Weston-super-Mare, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Wolverhampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Belgium Bulgaria Czechia Germany Hungary Latvia Lithuania Poland Puerto Rico Romania United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lichtman AH, Lux EA, McQuade R, Rossetti S, Sanchez R, Sun W, Wright S, Kornyeyeva E, Fallon MT. Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Nabiximols Oromucosal Spray as an Adjunctive Therapy in Advanced Cancer Patients with Chronic Uncontrolled Pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):179-188.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28923526 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-016064-36

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

GWCA0958

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Comparative Study of KW-2246
NCT01326689 COMPLETED PHASE3