Long Term Safety of Sativex Oromucosal Spray (Sativex®; Nabiximols) as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Persistent Chronic Cancer Related Pain

NCT ID: NCT01337089

Last Updated: 2023-04-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

660 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-19

Study Completion Date

2016-01-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This was a six-month open-label extension (OLE) study to evaluate the safety of long-term nabiximols (Sativex®) therapy when used as an adjunctive treatment in participants with advanced cancer. The study provided continued availability of nabiximols to participants who completed a preceding Phase 3 study and new (de novo) participants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a 6-month, multicenter, non-comparative, OLE study to evaluate the safety of long-term nabiximols use as an adjunctive measure in participants with advanced cancer. The study provided continued availability of nabiximols to participants who completed a preceding double-blind phase 3 study and de novo participants. Consenting eligible participants entered the extension study (Day 1) on the same day as the "end of treatment" visit of a parent study or within 7 days of the "end of treatment" visit or on the day of the "safety follow-up visit" of the parent study. The "safety follow-up" visit of a parent study was performed on the same day as Day 1, if the participant did not enter the OLE study on the same day as the "end of treatment" visit of a parent study. De novo participants attended a screening visit 3 to 14 days prior to enrollment (Day 1). All participants commenced dosing on Day 1. Further study visits took place after 2 weeks (Day 15), and every 4 weeks thereafter until the end of treatment period on Day 183 or earlier if the participant withdrew from the study.

Treatment was started as a single spray in the evening on the first day (Day 1). Participants then gradually titrated by 1 additional spray per day to an individualized dose, balancing efficacy and tolerability. Participants had to complete titration within 14 days of their first dose of study drug and then continue at the same dose for the remainder of the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Advanced Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Non-comparative, open-label Nabiximols

Nabiximols was self-administered by participants as a 100 microliter (μL) oromucosal spray, in the morning and evening, up to a maximum of 10 sprays per day for 6 months. Nabiximols oromucosal spray contained delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (27 milligrams \[mg\]/milliliter \[mL\]):cannabidiol (CBD) (25 mg/mL), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavoring. Each 100 μL actuation delivered 2.7 mg THC and 2.5 mg CBD.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nabiximols

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nabiximols

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Sativex®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participant had completed the parent study within the last seven days
* Willing and able to give written informed consent
* Willing and able to comply with all study requirements

Exclusion Criteria

* The participant was using cannabis or cannabinoid based medications, other than the parent study investigational medicinal product (IMP), and was unwilling to abstain for the duration of the study
* Any history or immediate family history of schizophrenia, other psychotic illness, severe personality disorder or other significant psychiatric disorder other than depression associated with their underlying condition
* Any known or suspected history of a substance abuse/dependence disorder (including opiate abuse/dependence prior to the diagnosis of cancer), current heavy alcohol consumption (more than 60 grams \[g\] of pure alcohol per day for men, and more than 40 g of pure alcohol per day for women), current use of an illicit drug or current non-prescribed use of any prescription drug
* Had poorly controlled epilepsy or recurrent seizures (for example, one or more seizure during the last year)
* Had experienced myocardial infarction or clinically significant cardiac dysfunction within the last 12 months or had a cardiac disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator would have put the participant at risk of a clinically significant arrhythmia or myocardial infarction
* Had significantly impaired renal function
* Had significantly impaired hepatic function at the "end of treatment" visit of the parent study
* Female participants of child-bearing potential and male participants whose partner was of child-bearing potential, unless willing to ensure that they or their partner used effective contraception, for example, oral contraception, double barrier, intra-uterine device, during the study and for 3 months thereafter (however, a male condom should not have been used in conjunction with a female condom as this may not have proven effective)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jazz Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

El Cajon, California, United States

Site Status

Gilroy, California, United States

Site Status

Glendale, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Rosa, California, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Holiday, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lynn Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Stuart, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Newnan, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Stockbridge, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Woodlawn, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Ashland, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Bossier City, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Missoula, Montana, United States

Site Status

Berlin, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Flat Rock, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Laredo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Lacey, Washington, United States

Site Status

Parkville, , Australia

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Gabrovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Vratsa, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Benešov, , Czechia

Site Status

České Budějovice, , Czechia

Site Status

České Budějovice, , Czechia

Site Status

Jablonec nad Nisou, , Czechia

Site Status

Most, , Czechia

Site Status

Nová Ves pod Pleší, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Sokolov, , Czechia

Site Status

Teplice, , Czechia

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Lünen, , Germany

Site Status

Stadtroda, , Germany

Site Status

Wetzlar, , Germany

Site Status

Wiesbaden, , Germany

Site Status

Deszk, , Hungary

Site Status

Komárom, , Hungary

Site Status

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Szikszó, , Hungary

Site Status

Beersheba, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Ẕerifin, , Israel

Site Status

Garbagnate Milanese, , Italy

Site Status

Piacenza, , Italy

Site Status

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Rēzekne, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Klaipėda, , Lithuania

Site Status

Šiauliai, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Chihuahua City, , Mexico

Site Status

Distrito Federal, , Mexico

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Bielsko-Biala, , Poland

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Czeladź, , Poland

Site Status

Częstochowa, , Poland

Site Status

Częstochowa, , Poland

Site Status

Działdowo, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Gliwice, , Poland

Site Status

Kłodzko, , Poland

Site Status

Opole, , Poland

Site Status

Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Włocławek, , Poland

Site Status

Ponce, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Baia Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Baia Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Brăila, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Constanța, , Romania

Site Status

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Focşani, , Romania

Site Status

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Satu Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Sibiu, , Romania

Site Status

Suceava, , Romania

Site Status

Târgovişte, , Romania

Site Status

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Bury, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bury St Edmunds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cheltenham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Crumpsall, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Gorleston-on-Sea, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Norwich, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Plymouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Weston-super-Mare, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Withington, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Bulgaria Czechia Germany Hungary Israel Italy Latvia Lithuania Mexico Poland Puerto Rico Romania Spain Taiwan United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-016529-32

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

GWCA0999

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Comparative Study of KW-2246
NCT01326689 COMPLETED PHASE3