Paraorbital-Occipital Alternating Current Stimulation Therapy of Patients With Post-Chiasmatic Lesions

NCT ID: NCT01418820

Last Updated: 2019-07-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-31

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Visual field areas, which are not absolutely blind, are hypothesized to have some residual capacities that constitute their potential for vision restoration. Vision restoration can be achieved by varies methods including behavioral training and electrical brain stimulation such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) which are able to influence the excitability and activity of cortical areas.

It is hypothesized that transorbital alternating current stimulation (tACS) can improve the residual field of vision in patients with post-chiasmatic lesions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Complete Hemianopia Incomplete Hemianopia Scotoma Quadrantanopia Stroke Hemorrhage Brain Trauma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Verum stimulation

repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Verum stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

10 days (2x 5 working days), daily transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) is applied with a device generating weak current pulses in predetermined firing bursts of 2 to 9 pulses. The amplitude of each current pulse is below 1000 µA. Current intensity is individually adjusted according to how well patients perceived phosphenes, e.g. any sensation of flickering light in response to the rtACS stimulation. Stimulation frequencies were between the individual alpha frequency peak and below flicker fusion.

Placebo stimulation

compared to verum stimulation the same electrode montage set-up is used during placebo stimulation, except that placebo patients receive a minimal stimulation

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Placebo stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

10 days (2x 5 working days), daily sham-stimulation with the same electrode montage set-up that is used for verum transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS). Minimal sham-stimulation was performed with single bursts (approx. one per min) of electrical currents at a given frequency of 5Hz and individually adjusted current amplitude.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Verum stimulation

10 days (2x 5 working days), daily transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) is applied with a device generating weak current pulses in predetermined firing bursts of 2 to 9 pulses. The amplitude of each current pulse is below 1000 µA. Current intensity is individually adjusted according to how well patients perceived phosphenes, e.g. any sensation of flickering light in response to the rtACS stimulation. Stimulation frequencies were between the individual alpha frequency peak and below flicker fusion.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placebo stimulation

10 days (2x 5 working days), daily sham-stimulation with the same electrode montage set-up that is used for verum transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS). Minimal sham-stimulation was performed with single bursts (approx. one per min) of electrical currents at a given frequency of 5Hz and individually adjusted current amplitude.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* lesion of the tractus opticus or of the visual cortex
* lesion age \> 6 months
* stable visual field defect with residual vision

Exclusion Criteria

* electric or electronic implants, e.g. heart pacer
* any metal artefacts in the head
* Epilepsy
* Auto-immune diseases in acute stage
* mental diseases, e.g. schizophrenia etc.
* diabetic retinopathy
* addictive diseases
* blood pressure above 160/100 mmHg
* instable or high level of intraocular pressure above 27 mmHg
* retinitis pigmentosa
* pathological nystagmus
* presence of an un-operated tumor or tumor relapse (patients with non-progressive tumor are eligible if study participation is recommended by medical authorities)
* focal findings in EEG or photosensitivity (patients with single seizure more than 10 yrs ago may participate)
* recurrent transitional ischemic attacks after stroke
* arteriosclerosis of large blood vessels with stenosis \>75%
* severe coronary heart disease (CHD)
* unstable angina pectoris
* diabetes with blood glucose level \> 9 mmol/l
* myocard infarct/ cardiomyopathy
* ventricular fibrillation
* risk of vascular thrombosis
* pregnant or breast-feeding women
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

EBS Technologies GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Magdeburg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bernhard A. Sabel

Prof. Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bernhard A Sabel, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Univ. of Magdeburg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Inst. f. Medical Psychology, Univ. of Magdeburg

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Raty S, Borrmann C, Granata G, Cardenas-Morales L, Schoenfeld A, Sailer M, Silvennoinen K, Holopainen J, De Rossi F, Antal A, Rossini PM, Tatlisumak T, Sabel BA. Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS). Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2021;39(3):221-235. doi: 10.3233/RNN-211198.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34219679 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EBS-PP-2011-02-16-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.