Paraorbital-Occipital Alternating Current Stimulation Therapy of Patients With Post-Chiasmatic Lesions
NCT ID: NCT01418820
Last Updated: 2019-07-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-03-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It is hypothesized that transorbital alternating current stimulation (tACS) can improve the residual field of vision in patients with post-chiasmatic lesions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Restoration of Vision After Stroke
NCT02405143
Non-invasive Current Stimulation for Restoration of Vision
NCT04008589
Combined tDCS and Vision Restoration Training in Post-acute Stroke: an Exploratory Efficacy and Safety Study
NCT02703870
Combined tDCS and Vision Restoration Training in Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study
NCT02935413
Non-invasive Repetitive Paraorbital Alternating Current Stimulation Therapy for Aphasia
NCT01277575
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Verum stimulation
repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS)
Verum stimulation
10 days (2x 5 working days), daily transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) is applied with a device generating weak current pulses in predetermined firing bursts of 2 to 9 pulses. The amplitude of each current pulse is below 1000 µA. Current intensity is individually adjusted according to how well patients perceived phosphenes, e.g. any sensation of flickering light in response to the rtACS stimulation. Stimulation frequencies were between the individual alpha frequency peak and below flicker fusion.
Placebo stimulation
compared to verum stimulation the same electrode montage set-up is used during placebo stimulation, except that placebo patients receive a minimal stimulation
Placebo stimulation
10 days (2x 5 working days), daily sham-stimulation with the same electrode montage set-up that is used for verum transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS). Minimal sham-stimulation was performed with single bursts (approx. one per min) of electrical currents at a given frequency of 5Hz and individually adjusted current amplitude.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Verum stimulation
10 days (2x 5 working days), daily transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) is applied with a device generating weak current pulses in predetermined firing bursts of 2 to 9 pulses. The amplitude of each current pulse is below 1000 µA. Current intensity is individually adjusted according to how well patients perceived phosphenes, e.g. any sensation of flickering light in response to the rtACS stimulation. Stimulation frequencies were between the individual alpha frequency peak and below flicker fusion.
Placebo stimulation
10 days (2x 5 working days), daily sham-stimulation with the same electrode montage set-up that is used for verum transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS). Minimal sham-stimulation was performed with single bursts (approx. one per min) of electrical currents at a given frequency of 5Hz and individually adjusted current amplitude.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* lesion age \> 6 months
* stable visual field defect with residual vision
Exclusion Criteria
* any metal artefacts in the head
* Epilepsy
* Auto-immune diseases in acute stage
* mental diseases, e.g. schizophrenia etc.
* diabetic retinopathy
* addictive diseases
* blood pressure above 160/100 mmHg
* instable or high level of intraocular pressure above 27 mmHg
* retinitis pigmentosa
* pathological nystagmus
* presence of an un-operated tumor or tumor relapse (patients with non-progressive tumor are eligible if study participation is recommended by medical authorities)
* focal findings in EEG or photosensitivity (patients with single seizure more than 10 yrs ago may participate)
* recurrent transitional ischemic attacks after stroke
* arteriosclerosis of large blood vessels with stenosis \>75%
* severe coronary heart disease (CHD)
* unstable angina pectoris
* diabetes with blood glucose level \> 9 mmol/l
* myocard infarct/ cardiomyopathy
* ventricular fibrillation
* risk of vascular thrombosis
* pregnant or breast-feeding women
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
EBS Technologies GmbH
INDUSTRY
University of Magdeburg
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bernhard A. Sabel
Prof. Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bernhard A Sabel, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Univ. of Magdeburg
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Inst. f. Medical Psychology, Univ. of Magdeburg
Magdeburg, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Raty S, Borrmann C, Granata G, Cardenas-Morales L, Schoenfeld A, Sailer M, Silvennoinen K, Holopainen J, De Rossi F, Antal A, Rossini PM, Tatlisumak T, Sabel BA. Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS). Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2021;39(3):221-235. doi: 10.3233/RNN-211198.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EBS-PP-2011-02-16-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.