Comparison Between Implanted Functional Electrical Stimulation and Foot Orthosis
NCT ID: NCT01415700
Last Updated: 2014-07-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
27 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-10-31
2014-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study is to compare the results of the implementation of an implanted stimulator in the levator muscles of the foot to the results obtained by wearing a splint-type reliever, which is considered standard treatment, in order to determine if the implanted stimulation may be proposed in the treatment of foot drop off a neurological center.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Thermo-plastic Versus Carbon Foot Ankle Orthosis to Improve Gait and Reduce Fatigue in Post-stroke Patients: a Biomechanical and Neurophysiological Study
NCT04323943
Augmenting Gait in a Population Exhibiting Foot Drop With Adaptive Functional Electrical Stimulation
NCT05346640
Physiological and Functional Effects of Percutaneous Neuromodulation vs Transcutaneous Neuromodulation
NCT06365931
Comparing the Ceriter Stride One, a Pressure-sensitive Smart Insole, With Gait Parameters Measured on the GRAIL in Neurological Populations
NCT07237386
Prosthetic Limbs After Leg Amputation: Alternative Method of Socket Design
NCT00061217
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stimulator
Functional electrical stimulator
The stimulator is surgically implanted
Orthosis
feet orthosis
feet orthosis specifically mold
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Functional electrical stimulator
The stimulator is surgically implanted
feet orthosis
feet orthosis specifically mold
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* can walk for 50 meters with or without technical assistance
* stable disease for at least 1 year
* possible walk with a brace-type reliever
* verification of possible nerve stimulation
* age greater than or equal to 18 years and under 75 years
* no toxin for 4 months
* no alcohol for 6 months
* no neurotomy for 1 year
* patient who agreed to sign an informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* wearing a stimulator implanted for other reasons
* patients taking neuroleptics, benzodiazepines, or antidepressants or other drugs that interfere with the quality of walking
* advanced peripheral neuropathy
* excessive restriction of passive range of ankle
* poorly controlled epilepsy
* pregnant or lactating
* non-membership of a social security scheme
* wearing orthopaedic shoes including the malleolus
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philippe Decq, PUPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Henri Mondor Hospital
Créteil, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2007-A01444-49
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
P070155
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.