R U OK? The Acceptability and Feasibility of New Communication Technologies for Follow-up After Medical Abortion

NCT ID: NCT01362387

Last Updated: 2013-02-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

999 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-04-30

Study Completion Date

2011-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose: This randomised trial will compare outcomes and acceptability of an alternative medical abortion follow-up protocol using standardised text messaging, on-line questionnaire, or a phone interview and a low sensitivity pregnancy test with the current standard of care which consists of either a clinic visit and ultrasound scan or a telephone call and high sensitivity pregnancy test.

Hypothesis: The use of "alternative" methods to assess outcomes after early medical abortion will achieve a higher rate of follow-up than women undergoing "standard" follow-up

Primary aim: To determine the follow-up rate after early medical abortion with an alternative protocol as compared to a standard follow-up protocol

Secondary aims:

* To assess complication rates and receipt of further treatment among women in the two study arms
* To ascertain women's preferences for mode of communication regarding their post-medical abortion status
* To determine provider opinions and preferences for different follow-up modalities

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Legally Induced Abortion, Complete, Without Mention of Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Women assigned to Group 1 will receive the standard post-abortion follow-up currently used at bpas and will be undertaken as usual by staff at the treating clinic

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Group 2

Follow-up after medical abortion using a standard text message, online or telephone questionnaire and a low sensitivity urine pregnancy test.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alternative follow-up protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

Women (n=1000) will be allocated by chance to one of two groups: alternative follow-up using a standard text message, online or telephone questionnaire and a low sensitivity urine pregnancy test, or standard follow-up which consists of an in person visit with an ultrasound or a telephone call and high sensitivity pregnancy test.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Alternative follow-up protocol

Women (n=1000) will be allocated by chance to one of two groups: alternative follow-up using a standard text message, online or telephone questionnaire and a low sensitivity urine pregnancy test, or standard follow-up which consists of an in person visit with an ultrasound or a telephone call and high sensitivity pregnancy test.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 16 years of age or older,
* eligible for an abortion under the terms of the Abortion Act (1967),
* requesting an early medical abortion,
* willing and able to comply with the study protocol and visit schedule,
* access to either a mobile phone, intranet or telephone and willing to have communication by one of these means to assess post-medical abortion status,
* willing to have call back messages left,
* willing and able to provide valid informed consent, and
* able to communicate in English.

Exclusion Criteria

* prior participation in this research study, or
* current participation in another research study that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the conduct of this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

British Pregnancy Advisory Service

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gynuity Health Projects

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hillary Bracken, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Gynuity Health Projects

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham Day Care Unit

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Chester Day Care Unit

Chester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London Central Day Care Unit

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Luton Day Care Unit

Luton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1.4.3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.