Comparative Effectiveness Multicenter Trial for Adhesion Characteristics of Ventral Hernia Repair Mesh
NCT ID: NCT01355939
Last Updated: 2015-02-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
173 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-05-31
2015-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Specific Aim I: To evaluate and compare the adhesion characteristics of intraperitoneal barrier-coated versus non-barrier-coated mesh during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.
Specific Aim II: To evaluate and compare the adhesion-related complications and adhesiolysis-related complications of intraperitoneal barrier-coated versus non-barrier-coated mesh during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.
Specific Aim III: To determine the comparative effectiveness of intraperitoneal barrier-coated versus non-barrier-coated ventral hernia repair mesh in reducing adhesions, adhesion-related complications, and adhesiolysis sequelae in actual patient subpopulations and clinical circumstances.
Specific Aim IV: To evaluate and compare the adhesiolysis-related complications of the laparoscopic and open approaches to adhesiolysis during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.
Specific Aim V: To determine the comparative effectiveness of the laparoscopic and open approaches to adhesiolysis during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Study Of A Size Tailored Approach To Repair Umbilical And Epigastric Primary Ventral Hernias
NCT01639118
Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair With IPOM
NCT03283982
A Study to Compare Ventral Incisional Hernia by Laparoscopic vs Open Repair With Mesh
NCT00240188
Tacks Versus Glue for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Treating Defects Between 2 and 5 cm Width
NCT03429374
Transfacial Sutures Versus Stapler for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT00773851
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Abdominal surgery after prior VHR with barrier-coated mesh
Clinically-Indicated Abdominal Re-Exploration Surgery
This is a prospective observational study. Abdominal re-exploration surgery is clinically-indicated and planned as the standard of care for the patients regardless of their decision to participate in the study.
Abdominal surgery after prior VHR with nonbarrier-coated mesh
Clinically-Indicated Abdominal Re-Exploration Surgery
This is a prospective observational study. Abdominal re-exploration surgery is clinically-indicated and planned as the standard of care for the patients regardless of their decision to participate in the study.
Lap adhesiolysis during abdominal surgery after prior VHR
Clinically-Indicated Abdominal Re-Exploration Surgery
This is a prospective observational study. Abdominal re-exploration surgery is clinically-indicated and planned as the standard of care for the patients regardless of their decision to participate in the study.
Open adhesioloysis during abdominal surgery after prior VHR
Clinically-Indicated Abdominal Re-Exploration Surgery
This is a prospective observational study. Abdominal re-exploration surgery is clinically-indicated and planned as the standard of care for the patients regardless of their decision to participate in the study.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clinically-Indicated Abdominal Re-Exploration Surgery
This is a prospective observational study. Abdominal re-exploration surgery is clinically-indicated and planned as the standard of care for the patients regardless of their decision to participate in the study.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* prior ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal placement of mesh (open or laparoscopic approach; absorbable barrier-coated mesh, permanent barrier-coated composite mesh, permanent barrier-coated noncomposite mesh, non-barrier-coated polypropylene mesh, or biologic mesh)
* subsequent abdominal procedure requiring exposure of entire surface area of intraperitoneal mesh
Exclusion Criteria
* inability to verify intraperitoneal mesh type or location
* active abdominal wound infection or open abdominal wound
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NIH
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Atrium Medical Corporation
INDUSTRY
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Brunt, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
University of California-San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
Baystate Medical Center
Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Greenville Medical Center
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-02112
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.