Efficacy and Safety of CDP6038 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis With an Unsuccessful Response to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (Anti-TNF) Therapy
NCT ID: NCT01242488
Last Updated: 2024-07-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
221 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-11-30
2012-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Olokizumab With Rheumatoid Arthritis With Previously Failed to Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor (Anti-TNF) Therapy
NCT01463059
Efficacy and Safety of CDP870 Versus Placebo in the Treatment of the Signs and Symptoms of Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT00548834
To Evaluate the Blood Levels and Safety of IV and Subcutaneous CDP6038 in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Methotrexate
NCT01009242
A Study of Tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) Versus Adalimumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT01119859
A Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) Given Subcutaneously in Combination With Traditional DMARDs in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT01232569
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CDP6038 60 mg sc every 2 weeks plus methotrexate
CDP6038
60 mg subcutaneously (sc) at Weeks 0, 2, 4 6, 8, and 10
Placebo iv
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
CDP6038 60 mg sc every 4 weeks plus methotrexate
CDP6038
60 mg sc at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
Placebo sc
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 2, 6 and 10
Placebo iv
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
CDP6038 120 mg sc every 2 weeks plus methotrexate
CDP6038
120 mg sc at Weeks 0, 2, 4 6, 8, and 10
Placebo iv
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
CDP6038 120 mg sc every 4 weeks plus methotrexate
CDP6038
120 mg sc at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
Placebo sc
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 2, 6 and 10
Placebo iv
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
CDP6038 240 mg sc every 2 weeks plus methotrexate
CDP6038
240 mg sc at Weeks 0, 2, 4 6, 8, and 10
Placebo iv
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
CDP6038 240 mg sc every 4 weeks plus methotrexate
CDP6038
240 mg sc at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
Placebo sc
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 2, 6 and 10
Placebo iv
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks plus methotrexate
Tocilizumab (Actemra or RoActemra)
8 mg/kg intravenously (iv) at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
Placebo sc
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 0, 2, 4 6, 8, and 10
Placebo sc every 2 weeks plus methotrexate
Placebo sc
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 0, 2, 4 6, 8, and 10
Placebo iv
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
Placebo sc every 4 weeks plus methotrexate
Placebo sc
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 0, 2, 4 6, 8, and 10
Placebo iv
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CDP6038
60 mg subcutaneously (sc) at Weeks 0, 2, 4 6, 8, and 10
CDP6038
120 mg sc at Weeks 0, 2, 4 6, 8, and 10
CDP6038
240 mg sc at Weeks 0, 2, 4 6, 8, and 10
Tocilizumab (Actemra or RoActemra)
8 mg/kg intravenously (iv) at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
CDP6038
60 mg sc at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
CDP6038
240 mg sc at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
CDP6038
120 mg sc at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
Placebo sc
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 0, 2, 4 6, 8, and 10
Placebo sc
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 2, 6 and 10
Placebo iv
0.9% Sodium chloride for injection at Weeks 0, 4 and 8
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must have been treated with MTX 12.5-25 mg/week, for at least 6 weeks prior to screening. Doses of 10 to \< 12.5mg/week are allowed if there is documented intolerance
* Have moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis disease with at least 6 tender and 6 swollen joints
* CRP ≥1.2 times the upper limit of normal (central laboratory) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate of more than 28mm/hour
* Intolerant or inadequate response to treatment (ie, TNF blocker failure)≥1 licensed TNF-blocker therapies within 2 years of screening
Exclusion Criteria
* Wheelchair bound or bedridden.
* Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than MTX.
* Treatment with tocilizumab or any other anti-IL-6 investigational therapies at any time.
* Treatment with other biologics within 4-24 weeks (depending on the biologic)
* History of ongoing, chronic or recurrent infections or recent serious or life-threatening infection
* Known concurrent acute or chronic viral hepatitis B or C infection or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
* Vaccinations (other than injectable influenza or pneumococcal) within 8 weeks prior to screening or plan to receive vaccines during the study
* Concurrent or history of malignancy with the exception of nonmelanoma skin cancer successfully treated more than 2 years prior to screening or cervical cancer successfully treated more than 5 years prior to screening.
* History of chronic alcohol abuse or drug addiction within the last 1 year or current drug addiction or use of illicit drugs.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UCB Pharma
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
UCB Clinical Trial Call Center
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
+1 877 822 9493 (UCB)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
166
Mesa, Arizona, United States
154
Paradise Valley, Arizona, United States
118
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
103
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
125
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
127
Covina, California, United States
148
La Jolla, California, United States
184
Long Beach, California, United States
177
Los Angeles, California, United States
104
Palo Alto, California, United States
149
Sacramento, California, United States
158
San Diego, California, United States
129
Santa Maria, California, United States
164
Upland, California, United States
107
Wildomar, California, United States
141
Hamden, Connecticut, United States
137
Norwalk, Connecticut, United States
101
Trumbull, Connecticut, United States
111
Lewes, Delaware, United States
176
Aventura, Florida, United States
186
Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
151
DeBary, Florida, United States
114
Jupiter, Florida, United States
183
Pinellas Park, Florida, United States
178
Sarasota, Florida, United States
140
South Miami, Florida, United States
157
Tampa, Florida, United States
130
Gainesville, Georgia, United States
162
Newnan, Georgia, United States
153
Savannah, Georgia, United States
113
Stockbridge, Georgia, United States
116
Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States
160
Moline, Illinois, United States
156
Rock Island, Illinois, United States
168
Springfield, Illinois, United States
133
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States
172
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
185
Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, United States
112
St Louis, Missouri, United States
134
St Louis, Missouri, United States
102
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
171
Freehold, New Jersey, United States
163
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
152
Toms River, New Jersey, United States
174
Brooklyn, New York, United States
115
Rochester, New York, United States
109
Belmont, North Carolina, United States
170
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
150
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
108
Columbus, Ohio, United States
100
Dayton, Ohio, United States
110
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
165
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
117
Wexford, Pennsylvania, United States
105
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
106
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
120
Amarillo, Texas, United States
135
Austin, Texas, United States
128
Dallas, Texas, United States
126
Houston, Texas, United States
132
Houston, Texas, United States
138
Houston, Texas, United States
181
Houston, Texas, United States
145
Mesquite, Texas, United States
143
Nassau Bay, Texas, United States
122
San Antonio, Texas, United States
144
Tomball, Texas, United States
142
Victoria, Texas, United States
121
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
139
Chesapeake, Virginia, United States
119
Seattle, Washington, United States
175
Tacoma, Washington, United States
136
Beckley, West Virginia, United States
167
Clarksburg, West Virginia, United States
401
Brussels, , Belgium
400
Liège, , Belgium
209
Torquay, Devon, United Kingdom
201
Wigan, Lancashire, United Kingdom
206
Essex, , United Kingdom
205
London, , United Kingdom
204
Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom
208
Southampton, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Furst D, Janssen N, Carter J, Dasgupta B, Bryson J, Duncan B, Zhu W, Pitzalis C, Durez P, Kretsos K. Efficacy and safety of olokizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to TNF inhibitor therapy: outcomes of a randomised Phase IIb study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Sep;73(9):1607-15. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204760. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010-020839-39
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RA0056
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.