Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
500 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-10-31
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
CVAD-Associated Skin Impairment in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Dressing vs No-Dressing
NCT03216824
Study on Pressure Ulcers Prevention With Mepilex® Border Sacrum Dressing in Scheduled Cardiovascular Surgery
NCT03823963
The Effectiveness of Silver Alginate (Algidex) Patch in the Prevention of Central Line Infections in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
NCT00964093
Evaluating Bactisure Wound Lavage in Orthopedic Wounds
NCT03192124
Antimicrobial Catheter Securement Dressings for the Prevention of Cvc-related Bloodstream Infections in Cancer Patients
NCT01544686
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One of the most common post-operative complications of surgical procedures remains surgical site infection, which causes significant morbidity and healthcare costs (estimated at $1.5 billion per year) among hospitalized patients. Surgical wounds for lower extremity revascularization are particularly prone to infection and dehiscence, with rates in some series as high as 44%(Kent, Bartek et al. 1996). Currently, the Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection recommends the use of sterile dressing to protect closed incisions for 24 to 48 hour postoperatively. However, no evidence-based recommendations are made with regards to dressing types for use in post-operative incision care.
A plethora of wound dressings are available in the market, with silver-based dressing among these recent innovations. Topical silver treatment is an effective bactericidal agent that does not induce bacterial resistance when used in therapeutic levels. Acticoat Absorbent®(Smith and Nephew, Inc.), an antimicrobial barrier dressing is coated with nanocrystalline silver that delivers a controlled, sustained (up to three days) dose of silver ions. Additionally, this dressing absorbs moisture (minimizing wound maceration), and is safe and effective against a broad range of microorganisms. Acticoat Absorbent® (Acticoat) is indicated for surgical wounds, chronic wounds, and burn wounds; however, data are lacking regarding in its potential role in postoperative surgical incision wound infection prophylaxis.
The Principal Investigator recently completed a non-concurrent, single-institution study of patients who received conventional non-silver containing dressing with Acticoat as post-operative dressing following defined lower extremity revascularizations(Childress, Berceli et al. 2007). The study population comprised 216 patients who underwent 248 cases that met inclusion criteria. Both groups were similar with regards to age at the time of first procedure, gender, race, diabetes, hypertension, current smoking, and renal insufficiency (creatinine \>1.5 mg/L). Furthermore, both groups had tissue loss as the most common indication for the lower extremity revascularization procedure, with 47% (55/118) for the control group and 38% (49/130) for the treatment group. Moreover, autogenous vein bypass graft was the most common procedure performed for the control (65/118, 55% of procedures) and treatment (54/130, 42% of procedures) groups.
The surgeons and other providers found the dressing regimen easy to apply and care for post-operatively. Revascularization pulses could be palpated through the dressing, and the low profile permitted identification of post-operative soft tissue changes such as hematomas. Compressive ace bandages could be applied without disturbing the original dressing.
Regarding the primary findings, no substantial dressing material specific complications were noted, including no apparent allergic reactions. The wound complication rate for the control group was 14% (17/118), and for the treatment group was 5% (7/130). Over the intervention phase, the wound overall complication rate fell by 64% (c2 = 5.76, df = 1, p = 0.016).
These findings provide clinical evidence that an Acticoat based dressing system offers a potentially efficacious, cost-effective adjunct to reduce surgical site infections for lower extremity revascularization. Based on this data, we believe that further investigation via multi-center randomized clinical trial is warranted. Thus for the current proposal we hypothesize that immediate application of Acticoat Absorbent® as a post-operative dressing would reduce closed incisional wound complications in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularizations involving infrainguinal skin incisions will result in a clinically significant reduction in wound complication rates compared to standard non-silver eluting dressing material.
Procedure:
* Patient randomized in OR after wound closure completed
* Wound closure technique at the discretion of the surgeon (Dermabond is a dressing and can not be utilized)
* Final OR dressing is test (silver vs standard) dressing, secured per surgeon preference
* Original OR dressing stays in place until gross soiling impairs standard wound hygiene, clinical need to remove, or POD#3, whichever comes first
* Subsequent dressings, wound care at the discretion of providers
* Visual wound checks at least at 2 and 4 weeks (+/- 5 days)
Clinical, economic, patient quality of life, and resource utilization data is then collected at standard clinical encounters
Primary Endpoint: Any wound complication within 30 days
Power and Sample Size Calculations:
* Current endpoint rate at least 25%(Kent, Bartek et al. 1996; Nguyen, Brahmanandam et al. 2007)
* Anticipate 10% absolute (40% relative) wound complication rate reduction(Childress, Berceli et al. 2007)
* Power 0.8
* alpha 0.05
* control event rate of 0.25
* treatment event rate of 0.15
* 1:1 randomization
* --\>total study sample size 250 per group (500 total).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Silver Eluting Dressing
Acticoat Absorbant™ applied as post-operative dressing
Surgical dressing
Acticoat Absorbant™ vs standard dry gauze as the immediate post operative dressing
Standard Guaze
Standard dry gauze applied as post-operative dressing
Surgical dressing
Acticoat Absorbant™ vs standard dry gauze as the immediate post operative dressing
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Surgical dressing
Acticoat Absorbant™ vs standard dry gauze as the immediate post operative dressing
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Undergoing open (an incision below inguinal ligament) surgical procedure for peripheral arterial vascular disease in which it is anticipated that the incisions will be closed. Open cases combined with endovascular approaches acceptable.
Exclusion Criteria
* Known allergy to silver or alginate
* Participation in another interventional clinical trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
OTHER
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center
FED
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
C. Keith Ozaki, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
C Keith Ozaki, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Michael Debakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Childress BB, Berceli SA, Nelson PR, Lee WA, Ozaki CK. Impact of an absorbent silver-eluting dressing system on lower extremity revascularization wound complications. Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 Sep;21(5):598-602. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.03.024. Epub 2007 May 23.
Nguyen LL, Brahmanandam S, Bandyk DF, Belkin M, Clowes AW, Moneta GL, Conte MS. Female gender and oral anticoagulants are associated with wound complications in lower extremity vein bypass: an analysis of 1404 operations for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46(6):1191-1197. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.07.053.
Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB, Chong V, Fabri PJ, Gibbs JO, Grover F, Hammermeister K, Irvin G 3rd, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr, Phillips L, Scamman F, Spencer J, Stremple JF. The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998 Oct;228(4):491-507. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199810000-00006.
Kent KC, Bartek S, Kuntz KM, Anninos E, Skillman JJ. Prospective study of wound complications in continuous infrainguinal incisions after lower limb arterial reconstruction: incidence, risk factors, and cost. Surgery. 1996 Apr;119(4):378-83. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80135-8.
Correia RM, Nakano LC, Vasconcelos V, Cristino MA, Flumignan RL. Prevention of infection in peripheral arterial reconstruction of the lower limb. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Oct 29;10:CD015022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015022.pub2.
Ozaki CK, Hamdan AD, Barshes NR, Wyers M, Hevelone ND, Belkin M, Nguyen LL. Prospective, randomized, multi-institutional clinical trial of a silver alginate dressing to reduce lower extremity vascular surgery wound complications. J Vasc Surg. 2015 Feb;61(2):419-427.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.034. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010-P-001149/1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.