Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters
NCT ID: NCT02381509
Last Updated: 2021-10-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1428 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-10-31
2021-09-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Crux Biomedical Vena Cava Filter Study - United States
NCT01120509
A Prospective, Multi-Center Study of the Bard® Denali™ Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filter System
NCT01305564
Crux Biomedical Evaluation of the Crux Inferior Vena Cava Filter System 3 ("RETRIEVE 3")
NCT01120522
Cook IVC Filter Study
NCT02046096
Study of IVC Filter Retrieval With the Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filter
NCT00196118
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Commercially available IVC filters from 6 manufacturers in the United States will be used. The type of FDA-cleared IVC filter implanted will be left to the discretion of the Principal Investigator at the Site. The following IVC filters will be utilized in this trial:
1. ALN Vena Cava Filter (with and without hook) (ALN Implants Chirurgicaux)
2. Option™ Elite Retrievable Vena Cava Filter (Argon Medical Devices Inc., designed and manufactured by Rex Medical)
3. VenaTech® LP Vena Cava Filter (B Braun Interventional Systems, Inc.) and VenaTech® Convertible™ Vena Cava Filter
4. DENALI® Vena Cava Filter System (DL900F, DL900J) (Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.)
5. Cook Günther-Tulip™ Vena Cava Filter (Cook Incorporated)
6. Cordis OPTEASE® Retrievable Vena Cava Filter and Cordis TRAPEASE® Permanent Vena Cava Filter (Cordis Corporation)
Subjects will be evaluated at Procedure, Discharge, 3-months, 6-months (phone), 12-months, 18-months (phone), and 24-months post-procedure. All subjects in whom the IVC filter is removed will be followed for 1-month postretrieval. Mandated follow-up imaging will be performed at 3 months (plain film) and 12 and 24 months (contrast abdominal CT). In addition, clinical visits with physical exam will be performed at 3 months, 12 months and 24 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IVC Filter
IVC filter for the prevention of PE
IVC Filter
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
IVC Filter
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Requires IVC filter for prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE);
* Provide written informed consent and written HIPAA authorization prior to initiation of study procedures;
* Willing to comply with the specified follow-up
Exclusion Criteria
* Known sensitivity to contrast or serious contrast reaction such as anaphylaxis for which premedication is known to be unsuccessful in alleviating symptoms
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ALN Implants Chirurgicaux
UNKNOWN
B. Braun Interventional Systems, Inc
INDUSTRY
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Cook Group Incorporated
INDUSTRY
Cordis Corporation
INDUSTRY
Argon Medical Devices
INDUSTRY
Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation
OTHER
Society for Vascular Surgery
OTHER
Carelon Research
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David L. Gillespie, MD, FACS
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Cape Cod Hospital
Matt Johnson, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Indiana University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Arkansas
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Ronald Regan UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Palo Alto VA
Palo Alto, California, United States
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Torrance, California, United States
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Medstar Georgetown
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Holy Cross Hospital
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
The Heart Institute Largo
Largo, Florida, United States
University of Miami Hospital and Clinics/Jackson Memorial
Miami, Florida, United States
Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, United States
Sarasota Memorial Hospital
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Tallahasse Memorial Hospital
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
St. Mary's Medical Center
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Carle Heart & Vascular Institute
Urbana, Illinois, United States
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
LSU Health Sciences Center at Shreveport
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Southcoast Hospital
North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
St. Louis University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Hackensack UMC
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Overlook Medical Center
Summit, New Jersey, United States
Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, United States
Feinstein Institute
Manhasset, New York, United States
Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States
NY Presbyterian Weil Cornell Medical Ctr
New York, New York, United States
Rochester Regional Health System
Rochester, New York, United States
University Hospital/SUNY Upstate
Syracuse, New York, United States
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Duke Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Wake Forest Baptist Health
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Miami Valley Hospital/Wright State University
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Fairfield Medical Center
Lancaster, Ohio, United States
University of Oklahoma-Tulsa
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Oregon Health & Science Center
Portland, Oregon, United States
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Rhode Island Hospital/Miriam Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
UT Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, United States
Memorial Hermann Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
Inova Fairfax Hospital
Falls Church, Virginia, United States
Medical College of WI/Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Johnson MS, Spies JB, Scott KT, Kato BS, Mu X, Rectenwald JE, White RA, Lewandowski RJ, Khaja MS, Zuckerman DA, Casciani T, Gillespie DL. Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters (PRESERVE): Outcomes at 12 months. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023 May;11(3):573-585.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.11.002. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
Johnson MS, Spies JB, Scott KT, Kato BS, Mu X, Rectenwald JE, White RA, Lewandowski RJ, Khaja MS, Zuckerman DA, Casciani T, Gillespie DL. Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters (PRESERVE): Outcomes at 12 months. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023 Apr;34(4):517-528.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.12.009. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
M01482
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.